I use my comp for mostly basic stuff (besides video editing) but i do this while on safari, itunes playing, on word, and downloading torrents. Do u think 2 gigs will benefit me?
NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Apple Notebook Forums › Apple Notebooks › 512 mb ram to 2 gig worth upgrade?
Join Now
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
Recent Reviews
-
I have this memory installed in my Inspiron 14R. 6gb (one 2gb & one 4gb). Great performance! I highly recommend Kingston.
-
Well what can I say, I needed that little bit of extra storage that as a family we could all use. After searching around I narrowed it down to three suppliers, not the cheapest, but all well...
-
I purchased this Nook Color specifically because I was taking a very long trip to China and wanted to be able to read without carrying a ton of books. I also liked that it had email capability...
-
This is an awesome mouse with an excellent grip for a mid sized to large size hand. Right-handed, comfortable, trendy, upscale, red, responsive, functional, task oriented. Overall A+++
-
This is great ram (so far so good). Very fast and efficient Ram. Good for overclocking my Sager np8150
512 mb ram to 2 gig worth upgrade? - Page 2
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »
post #22 of 32
9/18/06 at 6:28pm
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AppliedVisual
...Not sure where you got that information, but on large-move memory operations and high-bandwidth situations, there's a clear difference. After all, the base rate is 66MHz higher and both the CPU and system memory bus in the macbook, iMac as well as other Intel 9x5 chipset systems, exceeds that of the RAM -- so the RAM can become a bottleneck under intensive CPU <-> RAM operations. Not to mention the 667MHz / 333MHz base, syncs properly with the CPU bus and helps releive cache load in those memory intensive tasks.
Running Word, Xcel, Safari, Mail, or just playing back movies on YouTube won't stress your system and you'll never notice a difference or care. Video encoding/editing, 3D rendering, large database sorts, etc... The difference is apparent. Either way, not buying the 667MHz is somewhat foolish based on price alone... It's the same price, if not cheaper as it's currently produced in higher volume due to demand. I'm getting dejavu typing this... Probably because the net was riddled with these same forms of discussions last time around with PC-2700 vs. PC-32 00 DDR. |
my info is ALL over the web. 533 doesnt outperform 667 in any way. but the 667 really doesnt perform all that much better than the 533.
my point was simply get what the OPer can get. i went ahead with the 667 cause i got it for a steal. 533 will not hurt the laptop in any way, and no one will ever notice the difference. the bottleneck in these machines these days is not the ram anyways, its the HD's.
post #23 of 32
9/18/06 at 7:08pm
post #24 of 32
9/19/06 at 12:55am
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kgeier82
533 doesnt outperform 667 in any way. but the 667 really doesnt perform all that much better than the 533.
|
I suppose it's a matter of perspective... I've built enough systems and with the jobs I do, I see the difference even without running benchmark software. OTOH, the performance gain is small. It's like comparing the 2GHz Core Duo CPU to the 2.16 version -- most people will never notice a difference unless they actually compare benchmarks. In general use situations, nobody is going to know - you're right. But when the system is given a task like rendering out animation frames or transcoding video from HDCAM to DVCPROHD formats, or other such stuff I do all day long, every little bit of performance helps.
Quote:
| 533 will not hurt the laptop in any way, and no one will ever notice the difference. |
Yep, it won't hurt the laptop in any way... Most people won't know the difference, but there's always freaks like me.
Quote:
| the bottleneck in these machines these days is not the ram anyways, its the HD's. |
Unless of course your system is grinding away on a task that doesn't hit the drives much or at all. But for most people under general use, 99% of all their waiting on their system is when they load applications or files, provided they have enough RAM where the computer isn't swapping out to disk all the time.
I'm probably about the only one on these forums that even thinks about stuff this way. I have an extreme overclocker attitude and approach to most of my workhorse systems as every little bit counts for something. Animation sequences that take days to render across multiple systems can see huge savings in time / money (less downtime while we wait for results, faster turn-arounds, etc..) by simply adding a few MHz. I'll shut up now...
post #25 of 32
9/19/06 at 11:52am
no no, i agree with you applied visual, i buy the high speed stuff for the same reasons you do, to do it once and only once.
but most of my suggestions on here are for " the avg user" so i simply said get what he can get, in this situation.
a lot of the time on my macbook, the hard drive is almost taking off its so busy
but most of my suggestions on here are for " the avg user" so i simply said get what he can get, in this situation.
a lot of the time on my macbook, the hard drive is almost taking off its so busy
post #27 of 32
9/19/06 at 4:01pm
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by apg96
i ordered 2 gigs of 667 off newegg for a total of like 200 bucks, not too bad. It was G. Skill i think.
|
Yeah the G.Skill, Buffalo Select and Patriot memory are all right about $100 per 1GB module. They all seem to be getting good reviews. I noticed that newegg has 1GB G.Skill modules listed as open-box for $69.99 and that may be a good deal if they have more than just one of them and will still offer a return if they're defective.
post #28 of 32
9/19/06 at 9:21pm
post #29 of 32
9/20/06 at 9:59pm
He forgot to specify one thing - at standard TIMINGS there won't be a difference. Currently, the 4/4/4/12 533 ram is just as fast as the 5/5/5/16 667 ram; thanks to the timings. Now, if you could find a stick that matched the 533 ram, you would plaster it silly. But until then, they really are the same bandwidth wise.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AppliedVisual
I suppose it's a matter of perspective... I've built enough systems and with the jobs I do, I see the difference even without running benchmark software. OTOH, the performance gain is small. It's like comparing the 2GHz Core Duo CPU to the 2.16 version -- most people will never notice a difference unless they actually compare benchmarks. In general use situations, nobody is going to know - you're right. But when the system is given a task like rendering out animation frames or transcoding video from HDCAM to DVCPROHD formats, or other such stuff I do all day long, every little bit of performance helps.
Yep, it won't hurt the laptop in any way... Most people won't know the difference, but there's always freaks like me. Unless of course your system is grinding away on a task that doesn't hit the drives much or at all. But for most people under general use, 99% of all their waiting on their system is when they load applications or files, provided they have enough RAM where the computer isn't swapping out to disk all the time. I'm probably about the only one on these forums that even thinks about stuff this way. I have an extreme overclocker attitude and approach to most of my workhorse systems as every little bit counts for something. Animation sequences that take days to render across multiple systems can see huge savings in time / money (less downtime while we wait for results, faster turn-arounds, etc..) by simply adding a few MHz. I'll shut up now... |
post #30 of 32
9/21/06 at 2:58am
I can't really say much about 1 gig or 1.5 gig compared to 2 gig, but it certainly is an improvement over a half gig!
Yes, as others have said, if you're planning on using Parallels, get 2 gig. I get no hit on performance in OS X while Parallels is running.
Get it from newegg and install yourself. Make sure you have a set of precision screwdrivers (phillips size #00) to unscrew the itsy bitsy teeny little screws.
Yes, as others have said, if you're planning on using Parallels, get 2 gig. I get no hit on performance in OS X while Parallels is running.
Get it from newegg and install yourself. Make sure you have a set of precision screwdrivers (phillips size #00) to unscrew the itsy bitsy teeny little screws.
post #31 of 32
9/21/06 at 11:02pm
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »
Return Home
Back to Forum: Apple Notebooks
- 512 mb ram to 2 gig worth upgrade?
NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Apple Notebook Forums › Apple Notebooks › 512 mb ram to 2 gig worth upgrade?
Currently, there are 502 Active Users
(82 Members and 420 Guests)
Recent Discussions
- › Deals, deals, deals ... 2 minutes ago
- › Basic Notebook Guidance 6 minutes ago
- › How can I move my ipod music to ipad? 17 minutes ago
- › Where minds meet 3 hours, 2 minutes ago
- › NBF MobileForce 295.73 (32-Bit / 64-Bit) 6 hours, 19 minutes ago
- › For freewares hunters 6 hours, 24 minutes ago
- › Cool (at times "Free") iOS apps 6 hours, 32 minutes ago
- › Latitude D610: which (cheaper) non-Dell memory upgrade do I choose? 7 hours, 28 minutes ago
- › Unable to flash new bios to my AH530 - Any recommendations? 7 hours, 31 minutes ago
- › F/S Dell e1705/9400 + Steam Games 9 hours, 37 minutes ago
View: New Posts | All Discussions
Recent Reviews
- › Kingston 8GB (2 x 4GB) 204-Pin DDR3 SO-DIMM DDR3 1333 Laptop Memory by Nicadraus
- › Synology DiskStation 1-Bay (Diskless) Network Attached Storage... by Mr T
- › Barnes & Noble Nook Color by sewshoplady
- › Cooler Master CM Storm Spawn 3500 DPI Optical Sensor Gaming Mouse... by Rotterdamblues
- › Samsung MV-3T4G4 4GB DDR3 Laptop SDRAM (1333MHz PC3-10600) by Rotterdamblues
- › Alienware Aurora m9700 by amythompson172
- › Clevo P150HM by Rotterdamblues
- › Apple MacBook Air MC968LL/A 11.6-Inch Laptop (NEWEST VERSION) by danonlaptops
- › ASUS Zenbook UX31E-DH72 13.3-Inch Thin and Light Ultrabook (Silver... by danonlaptops
- › Toshiba Satellite L745D-S4220GR by Djembe
View: More Reviews
New Articles
- › Intel Cherryville SSD Spring 2012 Giveaway by ranjanis
- › Intel Cherryville SSD Giveaway 2012 - Terms... by ranjanis
- › Advertise by jdz2287
- › Search And Advanced Search Tutorial by NotebookForums
- › Tagging Tutorial by NotebookForums
- › Add A New Item Tutorial by NotebookForums
- › Image And Video Tutorial by NotebookForums
- › Subscription Tutorial by NotebookForums
- › Messaging Tutorial by NotebookForums
- › Terms Of Service by NotebookForums
View: New Articles | All Articles
Home | Reviews | Forums | Articles | My Profile
About NotebookForums.com | Join the Community | Advertise
© 2012 NotebookForums.com is powered by Huddler Tech | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map
About NotebookForums.com | Join the Community | Advertise
© 2012 NotebookForums.com is powered by Huddler Tech | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map






