New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Core 2 Duo 2.33 Vs 2.16

post #1 of 9
9/20/06 at 2:21pm
Thread Starter 
Okay guys I'm racking my brians here trying to find the exact performance between the 2.33 and the 2.16 and is it worth the extra $225. I know it's only 17ghz difference but these chips are on different speed scale chart than older cpu's.
Reply
Reply
post #2 of 9
9/20/06 at 2:34pm
do you know if the 2.33 would work on a e1705?
Reply
Reply
post #3 of 9
9/20/06 at 3:00pm
if i were you i wound go with the t7200 whats important its the features, the ghz at this stage are just not worth it. I myself have a T7400 and its great, but if you want to save there will be no difference between both.
Reply
Reply
post #4 of 9
9/20/06 at 3:37pm
the 2.33 is not worth the tiny speed advantage you would gain.
Reply
Reply
post #5 of 9
9/20/06 at 5:41pm
the T7200 screams... no need for anything faster... yet.
Reply
Reply
post #6 of 9
9/21/06 at 1:27pm
Thread Starter 
So what you guys are saying is I should go for the 2.0 instead of the 2.16 ? I always figure I should go with the middle man chip. Than again what are the specs in speed form the 2.0 to 2.33 or 2.0 to 2.16, will I really notice a difference?
Reply
Reply
post #7 of 9
9/21/06 at 1:34pm
Thread Starter 
Welp I just realized since I'm trying to buy the red m1710 I have to get the 2.16...oh well that answers that.
Reply
Reply
post #8 of 9
9/21/06 at 1:47pm
lol....
Reply
Reply
post #9 of 9
9/21/06 at 1:49pm
Based on clock speed difference alone, the 2.33 part is clocked 8% faster that the 2.16. In practice, you will be lucky to see 5% difference and only then with a CPU bound application. Only you can answer whether that is that worth $225 to you.

Noody
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home