NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Dell Forums › Dell Notebooks - General › UT2004 Benchmark in I8600
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

UT2004 Benchmark in I8600

post #1 of 27
3/10/04 at 6:56pm
Thread Starter 
Here is a batch file to run a DM-Rankin botmatch benchmark.

Instructions: (assuming default install path)
1) Save botmatch-rankin.bat to C:\UT2004Demo\Benchmark\
2) Save botmatchexec.txt to C:\UT2004Demo\Benchmark\Stuff
3) Run the batch file
4) See benchmark.log for results.

here are my results:
27.191425 / 63.202560 / 144.206161 fps -- Score = 63.229637

specs in signature, no oc
omega drivers 4.2, everything in default.

whats yours??

original post @ atari forums
Reply
Reply
post #2 of 27
3/10/04 at 7:24pm
25.675274 / 71.479790 / 165.479141 fps -- Score = 71.518181

Dell 8600 1,7ghz, 768mb ram, 60gb 7200rpm, ati 9600 pro turbo @ 363/273.
The new Ati 4.3 drivers.
Not bad
Reply
Reply
post #3 of 27
3/10/04 at 8:47pm
Thread Starter 
interesting, you clocked your vcard right??, yet that was not a ton of performance increase!

are you using the pure catalyst driver or the omega one??
Reply
Reply
post #4 of 27
3/11/04 at 7:21am
dennis you have your m10 overclocked? do you have normal temps?
Reply
Reply
post #5 of 27
3/11/04 at 10:25am
Quote:
Originally Posted by carvi423
dennis you have your m10 overclocked? do you have normal temps?
I use a notebook cooler under it, and it REALLY helps, so now I get lower temperatures when overclocked, then I did before with no overclocking.
I have the Bytecc cooler.
Reply
Reply
post #6 of 27
3/11/04 at 10:36am
Quote:
Originally Posted by shuzz
interesting, you clocked your vcard right??, yet that was not a ton of performance increase!

are you using the pure catalyst driver or the omega one??
It was actually a 13% increase over your score, which is actually not that little, and you must remember that the botmatch make a lot of use of the cpu because og all the bots, so the difference between scores with different graphic cards is much less than with flyby tests which is not that cpu bound.

I use the new Catalyst driver 4.3.
Reply
Reply
post #7 of 27
3/11/04 at 11:12am
What are tour temps now with that cooler without overclock?, and where can i get one?

Thanks
Reply
Reply
post #8 of 27
3/11/04 at 11:43am
Quote:
Originally Posted by carvi423
What are tour temps now with that cooler without overclock?, and where can i get one?

Thanks
The temperature completely depends on what I do, and which game I play.
Before, when I played the unreal 2004 demo on onslaught with 12 bots, the temperature on the gpu would be around 84-93 celsius on default clocks.
With the cooler it's about 72-82 celsius when gpu is overclocket and about 70-76 celsius when on default clocks.
That's a big change to me!

I bought it on a webshop here in Norway, but I bet you will find a place they sell it where you live.
Just search for "bytecc notebook cooler"

You can turn the fans on or off with a switch back on the unit, and the notebook will still run a little cooler than before, because it gets more air under the unit.
Reply
Reply
post #9 of 27
3/11/04 at 12:02pm
wow, it reduces quite well the temp of gpu, i want to buy one but here in spain i dont find a place to buy, i dont know if they send it here.


Thanks

¡¡¡ETA-NO!!! sorry but i had to say it.
Reply
Reply
post #10 of 27
3/11/04 at 12:05pm
Thread Starter 
geez those temperatures are awsome!, i´ll have to get one of them!! well, first i will need some money......
Reply
Reply
post #11 of 27
3/11/04 at 12:05pm
Last question what model is your cooler?, is the nc-500?


Thanks
Reply
Reply
post #12 of 27
3/11/04 at 12:14pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by carvi423
Last question what model is your cooler?, is the nc-500?


Thanks
Yes.
Reply
Reply
post #13 of 27
3/11/04 at 12:26pm
i thinki cant get one here in spain
Reply
Reply
post #14 of 27
3/11/04 at 1:33pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by shuzz
interesting, you clocked your vcard right??, yet that was not a ton of performance increase!

are you using the pure catalyst driver or the omega one??
No offense, but that's a huge difference. 71 to 63 frames is an increase of 13%!
Consider that the 9700 mobility is ~ 20% of an increase so you're about 60 percent of the way there.
Reply
Reply
post #15 of 27
3/11/04 at 1:44pm
Thread Starter 
i was talking about the vcard, but as dennis said "you must remember that the botmatch make a lot of use of the cpu because og all the bots", so his 1.7 Pentium M, has a lot to say to that 13% increase. but yes 13% is quite a lot comming from the same card.
Reply
Reply
post #16 of 27
3/11/04 at 1:51pm
what about antec notebook cooler? is it good?
Reply
Reply
post #17 of 27
3/11/04 at 1:58pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by carvi423
what about antec notebook cooler? is it good?
I would guess so.
Reply
Reply
post #18 of 27
3/11/04 at 10:31pm
I picked up the Targus notebook cooler and it's excellent. Really quiet and my Inspiron 8600 1.7Ghz processor sits between 31C and 35C when idling, connected by wifi. Sweet. :-)
Reply
Reply
post #19 of 27
3/11/04 at 10:33pm
I'm just downloading the demo of UT2004 to give others an idea, using the 4.3 Catalysts on default clock. Watch this space..
Reply
Reply
post #20 of 27
3/12/04 at 12:00am
I got these results, with a default clock:

26.663723 / 65.253967 / 163.272415 fps -- Score = 65.477577 rand[9600]

For some reason, enabling overclocking did nothing. I clocked up to 382/282 and got no difference. Any ideas why?
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Dell Notebooks - General
NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Dell Forums › Dell Notebooks - General › UT2004 Benchmark in I8600