NotebookForums.com › Forums › Off Topic › Desktop and Hardware Discussion › nVidia GeForce 8800 clocked at 11200 3D06
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

nVidia GeForce 8800 clocked at 11200 3D06

post #1 of 26
11/5/06 at 6:08pm
Thread Starter 
Reply
Reply
post #2 of 26
11/5/06 at 6:51pm
Those are insane scores!!!
Reply
Reply
post #3 of 26
11/6/06 at 2:41am
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tate
Those are insane scores!!!
Whats even better... might be able to link 3 of 'em up in SLi as opposed to 2
Reply
Reply
post #4 of 26
11/6/06 at 5:07pm
this is getting ridiculous haha

4 core cpu chips (or 8 if you are running duel cpus) and there's already quad sli but now potential for 6 gpu's

sick sick sick...
Reply
Reply
post #5 of 26
11/6/06 at 9:07pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yang88She
this is getting ridiculous haha

4 core cpu chips (or 8 if you are running duel cpus) and there's already quad sli but now potential for 6 gpu's

sick sick sick...
I wasn't an NBFer when I had my old vapo rig, but I used to do some heavy overclocking. We should build new rigs w/8800's and see who can get the higher 3dmark score.
Reply
Reply
post #6 of 26
11/6/06 at 9:29pm
u challenging me chode?

haha...well I would love to build another rig for benching etc., but now that i'm living here on the west coast (costs TONS more to live out here)...

I won't be building another rig until spring probably (when I have my own place again)

I'm sure we can break some records chode or rack up some serious electric bills =P
Reply
Reply
post #7 of 26
11/6/06 at 9:49pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yang88She
u challenging me chode? haha...well I would love to build another rig for benching etc., but now that i'm living here on the west coast (costs TONS more to live out here)... I won't be building another rig until spring probably (when I have my own place again) I'm sure we can break some records chode or rack up some serious electric bills =P
true. i wont be building a new rig for a few months, so you have time to prepare for destruction I gotta pull up some of my old cpu-z screen shots and 3dm screens.
Reply
Reply
post #8 of 26
11/11/06 at 5:37pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yang88She
<snip> or rack up some serious electric bills =P

Ahh, the beauty of having a broken power meter (for about 2 years!)
Reply
Reply
post #9 of 26
11/11/06 at 7:42pm
wonder what kind of improvments nvidia will get by using ddr4 mem

wonder what ati will come out with to answer nvidia's call


will be nice to see what happens in the first quater, processer market is gonna be lame, cause intel is thinking more cores, amd is busy with ati and getting the merge going smoothe

will be a good yearfor computers in 2007, cant wait


soulsaver
Reply
Reply
post #10 of 26
11/11/06 at 7:44pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yang88She
this is getting ridiculous haha

4 core cpu chips (or 8 if you are running duel cpus) and there's already quad sli but now potential for 6 gpu's

sick sick sick...
qft, i wish the tech would get better, not just slap on more cores, yes it help slightly

how about more cache and better use of the cache itself, how about make it so no more need for a paging file, that you can use some of the processers cache or the ram can be used diffrently

i dunno, id rather see somthing better than quad core myself


somthing new and great


soulsaver
Reply
Reply
post #11 of 26
11/11/06 at 8:09pm
Here's some 8800 GTX SLI scores to drool over

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=122394
Reply
Reply
post #12 of 26
11/11/06 at 9:26pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by contrvlr65
Here's some 8800 GTX SLI scores to drool over http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=122394
3dmark benchmarks suck, no one cares about them anymore only thing itt does is gives a base of where your card should be not only that, i havent read your link, but you know that the free version of 3dmark only comes in 1024/768 res? you know how easy it would be to get 10k plus with that rez? not only that, but im sure he has a bottleneck somewhere to give him less scores, hence 3dmark sucks and isnt worth much for benchmarking not only that, hes phase cooling, thats extreme, and i highly doubt someone on air would get those scores also, he has a quad core intel chip, kentsfield.......but nice none the less, shows where the tech is going, and where we will end up mid quarter next year soulsaver
Reply
Reply
post #13 of 26
11/12/06 at 2:09am
Quote:
Originally Posted by soulsaver_8229
3dmark benchmarks suck, no one cares about them anymore

only thing itt does is gives a base of where your card should be

not only that, i havent read your link, but you know that the free version of 3dmark only comes in 1024/768 res? you know how easy it would be to get 10k plus with that rez?

not only that, but im sure he has a bottleneck somewhere to give him less scores, hence 3dmark sucks and isnt worth much for benchmarking

not only that, hes phase cooling, thats extreme, and i highly doubt someone on air would get those scores

also, he has a quad core intel chip, kentsfield.......but nice none the less, shows where the tech is going, and where we will end up mid quarter next year


soulsaver

1--Someone must or this thread wouldn't have started
2--I agree
3&4--3dmark06 res. is 1280x1024, much easier to get those scores at the tests default resolution than the res. the cards are capable of
5--Reading the specs I could see no bottlenecks
6--Extreme yes it's from extremesystems.org/ no way it's happening with air unless you hook up a 6500 btu ac unit
7--All of these components are currently available, mid quarter next year is here!

Jees man, it's only numbers
Reply
Reply
post #14 of 26
11/12/06 at 2:37am
Quote:
Originally Posted by soulsaver_8229
3dmark benchmarks suck, no one cares about them anymore

only thing itt does is gives a base of where your card should be

not only that, i havent read your link, but you know that the free version of 3dmark only comes in 1024/768 res? you know how easy it would be to get 10k plus with that rez?

not only that, but im sure he has a bottleneck somewhere to give him less scores, hence 3dmark sucks and isnt worth much for benchmarking

not only that, hes phase cooling, thats extreme, and i highly doubt someone on air would get those scores

also, he has a quad core intel chip, kentsfield.......but nice none the less, shows where the tech is going, and where we will end up mid quarter next year


soulsaver
after a certain level of hardware performance, the difference between 1024x768 and 1280x1024 is negligible.
Reply
Reply
post #15 of 26
11/12/06 at 3:18am
hunter will beat you all.........
Reply
Reply
post #16 of 26
11/12/06 at 2:11pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by chode messiah
after a certain level of hardware performance, the difference between 1024x768 and 1280x1024 is negligible.
agreed, that isnt a big difrence

however 1900x1200 is a big diffrence

soulsaver
Reply
Reply
post #17 of 26
11/12/06 at 8:22pm
If I got the Geforce 8800 would I be okay with my proccesor because I heard you need a fast proccesor? I have a P4 3.4Ghz If you need to know when I get the Graphics card I will have 3GB of PC4200 533mhz ram

Cheers,
Freak
Reply
Reply
post #18 of 26
11/12/06 at 11:51pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by PC Gaming Freak
If I got the Geforce 8800 would I be okay with my proccesor because I heard you need a fast proccesor? I have a P4 3.4Ghz If you need to know when I get the Graphics card I will have 3GB of PC4200 533mhz ram

Cheers,
Freak
no, your processer would be......a fat guy walking in heat in florida, and your video card would be a cheeta.....

get a dual core 2.4ish or so, and 2x1 gig of ram if you intend to drop 600 on a video card to match up


soulsaver
Reply
Reply
post #19 of 26
11/13/06 at 12:23am
Yes that is exacly what I thought of geting the Core duo 2.4Ghz but I only have a 925X motherbored so I would have to by a new motherbored and at 16 money doesnt grown on trees lol. Thanks How would you think it would run though?
Reply
Reply
post #20 of 26
11/13/06 at 10:27pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by PC Gaming Freak
Yes that is exacly what I thought of geting the Core duo 2.4Ghz but I only have a 925X motherbored so I would have to by a new motherbored and at 16 money doesnt grown on trees lol. Thanks How would you think it would run though?
itd run ok, but if you have the money to buy one 8800gtx

get a new mobo/proc/ram/hard drive, and a buget video card to match the proc well enough to make it look better......then when you have more money to upgrade, upgrade the video card first, then work on the other stuff


soulsaver
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Desktop and Hardware Discussion
NotebookForums.com › Forums › Off Topic › Desktop and Hardware Discussion › nVidia GeForce 8800 clocked at 11200 3D06