NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Asus Notebook Forums › Asus Notebooks › Asus claims first Radeon X2300 laptop - ASUS A8Jr
Join Now
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
Recent Reviews
-
This is an awesome mouse with an excellent grip for a mid sized to large size hand. Right-handed, comfortable, trendy, upscale, red, responsive, functional, task oriented. Overall A+++
-
This is good Ram and fast. I like it for my Clevo / Pro-Star WP150HNQ. Both thumbs up!
-
This is great ram (so far so good). Very fast and efficient Ram. Good for overclocking my Sager np8150
-
Fantastic had this machine 6 months and can honestly say have had no bother with it. Plays games better than most desktops and keeps up with the rest which is outstanding for a...
-
The Clevo P150HM / Sager np8150 is everything one would expect from a reputable builder like Clevo. This is my 2nd Clevo purchase and I am very happy with the P150HM. I went with the 2nd...
Asus claims first Radeon X2300 laptop - ASUS A8Jr
post #2 of 9
1/23/07 at 3:19pm
post #3 of 9
1/24/07 at 2:45pm
post #4 of 9
1/24/07 at 3:13pm
- Joined: 4/2006
- Location: asdfjkl;
- Posts: 1,497
- Select All Posts By This User
post #5 of 9
1/24/07 at 4:52pm
- Joined: 2/2004
- Location: Over your house
- Posts: 249
- Select All Posts By This User
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mitcity22
I am PRETTY sure that the x2300 is just going to be the replacement for the x1300 and/or the x1400 GPU. The big difference is that it is based on the R600 so it is a DX10 mobile card.
|
I see. So I'm going to want to wait until they start coming out with the X2600/X2700 if I want the real next big step. Which leads me to believe that Nvidea would be coming out with their DX10 version...maybe the Go8600/8700? Nothing to do but wait...wait...wait...
post #6 of 9
4/13/07 at 11:22am
- Joined: 8/2006
- Location: Aventura, FL
- Posts: 55
- Select All Posts By This User
Aww man!, the X2300 isn't an upgrade from the X1800/1900 at all.
It looks like a watered down, energy efficient, hybrid to the X1800.
They're actually identical in all but the following specs:
(X1900 first spec, X2300 second spec)
312 million transistors - 105 million transistors
36 Pixel Shader Processors - 4 Pixel Shader Processors
8 Vertex Shader Processors - 2 Vertex Shader Processors
256-bit 8-channel DDR1/DDR2/GDDR3 memory interface - 128-bit 4-channel DDR1/DDR2/GDDR3 mem...
Up to 384 simultaneous pixel threads - Up to 128 simultaneous pixel threads
Not DX10 compatible - Not DX10 compatible (VISTA compatible yes, DX10 no!)
So with the X2300, you get greatly improved battery life, but a technically inferior product to the X1800/X1900.
That kinda sucks.
It looks like a watered down, energy efficient, hybrid to the X1800.
They're actually identical in all but the following specs:
(X1900 first spec, X2300 second spec)
312 million transistors - 105 million transistors
36 Pixel Shader Processors - 4 Pixel Shader Processors
8 Vertex Shader Processors - 2 Vertex Shader Processors
256-bit 8-channel DDR1/DDR2/GDDR3 memory interface - 128-bit 4-channel DDR1/DDR2/GDDR3 mem...
Up to 384 simultaneous pixel threads - Up to 128 simultaneous pixel threads
Not DX10 compatible - Not DX10 compatible (VISTA compatible yes, DX10 no!)
So with the X2300, you get greatly improved battery life, but a technically inferior product to the X1800/X1900.
That kinda sucks.
post #7 of 9
4/13/07 at 11:32am
Just a note to all people about ATI and NVidia card naming process, to help distinguish how "powerful" a card might be. Their numbering system is broken down as such:
XYYY where X = the generation and YYY - the series
As we all know, cards go through generations. For ATI originally we had the 100 cards, which technically were 0100 (first generation). We then moved onto 1000 (generation 2) and now we're moving up to 2000's (generation 3). This is more a difference in technology (ie 0100 cards were DX8, 1000's were DX9, and 2000's are going to DX10).
The actual POWER of the card, is signified by the series number, no the generation number. So the higher the series number, the more "powerful" the card. For example, a 1600 series card is going to be a lot more powerful than a 2300 series card, from a performance standpoint. You'll get better frame rates, etc.
If you have a choice between a 1600 card and a 2600 card, take the 2600 because you get same performance (600 series) but a newer genration (DX 10 vs DX9). But if you're looking for higher frame rates, take a 1600 over a 2300. Hope this helps.
XYYY where X = the generation and YYY - the series
As we all know, cards go through generations. For ATI originally we had the 100 cards, which technically were 0100 (first generation). We then moved onto 1000 (generation 2) and now we're moving up to 2000's (generation 3). This is more a difference in technology (ie 0100 cards were DX8, 1000's were DX9, and 2000's are going to DX10).
The actual POWER of the card, is signified by the series number, no the generation number. So the higher the series number, the more "powerful" the card. For example, a 1600 series card is going to be a lot more powerful than a 2300 series card, from a performance standpoint. You'll get better frame rates, etc.
If you have a choice between a 1600 card and a 2600 card, take the 2600 because you get same performance (600 series) but a newer genration (DX 10 vs DX9). But if you're looking for higher frame rates, take a 1600 over a 2300. Hope this helps.
post #8 of 9
4/13/07 at 5:15pm
- pyro_dragun
- 0
- Money match?
- offline
- Joined: 1/2005
- Location: New York, NY
- Posts: 5,279
- Select All Posts By This User
Almost but not quite Frubles.
You got it right that the x2300 will be slower than an x1600, but, your comparison of the "equivalences" between next and current gen is not quite correct. The next generation with the equivalent is always faster than the last generation. Otherwise based on your logic, the Geforce 6600 would be just as fast as the 7600 and the Radeon x600 the same speed as the x1600, which we simply know is not true. New features are only part of the new generation of cards. If there was no improved performance, then there would be no incentive to upgrade.
You got it right that the x2300 will be slower than an x1600, but, your comparison of the "equivalences" between next and current gen is not quite correct. The next generation with the equivalent is always faster than the last generation. Otherwise based on your logic, the Geforce 6600 would be just as fast as the 7600 and the Radeon x600 the same speed as the x1600, which we simply know is not true. New features are only part of the new generation of cards. If there was no improved performance, then there would be no incentive to upgrade.
post #9 of 9
4/13/07 at 5:37pm
- scoutingwraith
- 0
- -{Anime Fan}-
- offline
- Joined: 8/2006
- Location: Sector ZZ9 plural Z alpha
- Posts: 240
- Reviews: 1
- Select All Posts By This User
X2300 is not a DX10 card.
Taken from ATI's website. The X2300 is just a replacement for the X1400 series
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ATI
Mobility™ Radeon® X2300 Product Features \t\t
|
Return Home
Back to Forum: Asus Notebooks
NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Asus Notebook Forums › Asus Notebooks › Asus claims first Radeon X2300 laptop - ASUS A8Jr
Currently, there are 197 Active Users
(1 Member and 196 Guests)
Recent Discussions
- › Which netbook to buy? Budget around 200-500€. 1 hour, 22 minutes ago
- › Automotive Dealer 3 hours, 10 minutes ago
- › SpareRoom (shehzadim) 5 hours, 16 minutes ago
- › Where minds meet 7 hours, 43 minutes ago
- › A65 Satellite runs on battery only, won't recognize power cord 8 hours, 25 minutes ago
- › Charging issue with R52 18 hours, 20 minutes ago
- › Toshiba Portege R830-138 and Docking Station 18 hours, 22 minutes ago
- › Mass Effect 2 (PS3/360/PC) 18 hours, 59 minutes ago
- › ASUS stuff 19 hours, 6 minutes ago
- › Intel Cherryville SSD Giveaway - Enter here!! 19 hours, 41 minutes ago
View: New Posts | All Discussions
Recent Reviews
- › Cooler Master CM Storm Spawn 3500 DPI Optical Sensor Gaming Mouse... by Rotterdamblues
- › Kingston 8GB (2 x 4GB) 204-Pin DDR3 SO-DIMM DDR3 1333 Laptop Memory by Rotterdamblues
- › Samsung MV-3T4G4 4GB DDR3 Laptop SDRAM (1333MHz PC3-10600) by Rotterdamblues
- › Alienware Aurora m9700 by amythompson172
- › Clevo P150HM by Rotterdamblues
- › Apple MacBook Air MC968LL/A 11.6-Inch Laptop (NEWEST VERSION) by danonlaptops
- › ASUS Zenbook UX31E-DH72 13.3-Inch Thin and Light Ultrabook (Silver... by danonlaptops
- › Asus Eee PC 1001P by Catriona
- › Toshiba Satellite L745D-S4220GR by Djembe
- › Toshiba Satellite P755-S5270 15.6-Inch LED Laptop (Black) by sRc
View: More Reviews
Recent Articles
- › Intel Cherryville SSD Giveaway 2012 - Terms... by ranjanis
- › Advertise by jdz2287
- › Search And Advanced Search Tutorial by NotebookForums
- › Tagging Tutorial by NotebookForums
- › Add A New Item Tutorial by NotebookForums
- › Image And Video Tutorial by NotebookForums
- › Subscription Tutorial by NotebookForums
- › Messaging Tutorial by NotebookForums
- › Terms Of Service by NotebookForums
- › Following And Followers by NotebookForums
View: Recent Articles | All Articles
Home | Reviews | Forums | Articles | My Profile
About NotebookForums.com | Join the Community | Advertise
© 2012 NotebookForums.com is powered by Huddler Tech | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map
About NotebookForums.com | Join the Community | Advertise
© 2012 NotebookForums.com is powered by Huddler Tech | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map





