NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Dell Forums › Dell Home (Inspiron, XPS, Studio) › 9300/XPS2 - 250GB hard disk upgrade
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

9300/XPS2 - 250GB hard disk upgrade - Page 2

post #21 of 31
[quote=DaddyOf2Girls;2722120]To compare apples to apples I ran the test again Using HD Tune 2.54
Western Digital WD2055BEVE 250Gb 5400 RPM
Min: 25.6 Mb/sec
Max: 61.0 Mb/sec
Ave: 47.1 Mb/sec
Access Tike: 17.3 ms
Burst Rate: 57.8 Mb/sec - alot lower than HD Tech burst rate of 91.9 Mb/sec hmmm
CPU Usage: 3.5%



wow, thats one fast drive

PS 2 girls plus twins........get some sleep mate
post #22 of 31
Arrived - put it in my gen2 - it's awesome so far


post #23 of 31
I still don't get how some 5400 hds can beat 7200 hd's in performance. But hey, from the benchmarks I'm seeing, I rather plop the 200 bucks on this 250 gig than the seagate 200gig 7200rpm.
post #24 of 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by zergslayer69 View Post
I still don't get how some 5400 hds can beat 7200 hd's in performance. But hey, from the benchmarks I'm seeing, I rather plop the 200 bucks on this 250 gig than the seagate 200gig 7200rpm.
It's quite simple really, larger hard drive have denser platters, so the heads don't have to move as far to access data, thereby reducing seek time even though it is running at a slower rotational speed. a 200gb hdd at 7200rpm would probably still be faster, but this will be faster than the 60-100gb 7200rpm drives most 9300/xps2/m170 owners would have.
post #25 of 31
I think I sort of get it. I won't expect you to give me a full fledged lecture on harddrives but thanks for the explanation. I wonder if it'll be a simple buy, plug, play. Or do I have to do some special driver install.
post #26 of 31
plug and install your os of choice
no driver needed
post #27 of 31
That's it? Awesome. Thanks for answering. Let me give you some rep candy =p
post #28 of 31
Thread Starter 
Yup.
It was that easy for me.

I actually purchased a CMS USB drive case to clone my existing OS.
Then it became the housing for my old hard disk.

Swap the drives and that was it.
I got a warning from XP that I had to Re Activate windows because the hardware had siginifantly changed. But I clicked the link and a few seconds later it said I was good to go.

I did have a problem duel booting to Vista. But that turned out not to be related to the hard disk. However in the procecss of diagnosing the problem, i downloaded a tool from WesternDigital to test the Hard disk.
After several hours of checking each sector, it reported Zero errors.
That made me very happy.
post #29 of 31
Hey Daddy.. did you notice that setting the HD to "enable advanced performance" in device manager really makes this baby hum? But I did have one question - websites say one caveat to this increased performance is the risk that you take of losing data due to there no longer being a cache utilized.

But as I understand it, this data loss would only occur if you were writing to the disk during an installation lets say and the power failed.

I ask because I thankfully haven't gotten the BSOD yet on my new vista install, but I did have it hang at shutdown twice and had to manually shutdown the computer (when I did this it had hung for at least 15 and there was no disk access light flashing) - do you think any harm was done if it was turned off during this period of inactivity?

Thanks for the help and it was your high recommendation of this drive that I got it in the first place - thanks!

AC
post #30 of 31
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ac2334 View Post
Hey Daddy.. did you notice that setting the HD to "enable advanced performance" in device manager really makes this baby hum? But I did have one question - websites say one caveat to this increased performance is the risk that you take of losing data due to there no longer being a cache utilized.

But as I understand it, this data loss would only occur if you were writing to the disk during an installation lets say and the power failed.

I ask because I thankfully haven't gotten the BSOD yet on my new vista install, but I did have it hang at shutdown twice and had to manually shutdown the computer (when I did this it had hung for at least 15 and there was no disk access light flashing) - do you think any harm was done if it was turned off during this period of inactivity?

Thanks for the help and it was your high recommendation of this drive that I got it in the first place - thanks!

AC
Glad it worked out for you.
I have been running over a week and mine is working great.


No I have not tried enhanced performance.
Do you have a link to the WD site where it talks about the performance increase and risks?

You say no cash will be used, but from what I understand, less cache used means less risk. More means more risk.

Here is the example:
100 story building = 100 cylinders (each floor is a cylinder) (requires physical movement of the elevator.
Elevator = The Hard Disk Heads
People = Data be Read or Written
Maximum capacity of the Elevator = cache



Then say:
Person A gets on at Floor 1 and pushed the button to go to Floor 100.
While in route, at the 10th Floor, 50 People push the button, wanting to go back down to the first .
Without enhanced performance, the 50 people would wait for the elevator to go to the 100th floor then back down to the first floor.
With "enhanced performance" the elevator operator would make a judgment call and decide it would be more efficient to take the 50 people to the first floor
because it is closer to the elevators current location and because
"The Needs of the Many outweigh the needs of the Few or the One"

In this "enhanced performance" mode, the original person who got on at the first floor with desire to go to 100th floor, since he is buy himself, might end up riding in the elevator for quite a while before finally making it to his destination. If he was a real person he would be quite upset. But since we already said he is Data and we know that Data is an android and does not have emotions, he will understand and wait patiently.

However if Power is lost, the elevator crashes with zero survivors.
So Data runs a greater risk of being lost. Eventually when the building closes and everyone goes home for the night, Data will finally make it to his desired floor 100.


Bottom line, if there is no disk activity then there should be no more risk of g a file corrupt with enhanced performance than without.


post #31 of 31
Might have to pick this up (eventually). I'm going to be using my XPS2 for quite some time, and it's obvious they're never going to release a bigger 7200rpm HD for ATA/100.

WD doesn't have this drive listed on their site except for this: http://www.wdc.com/en/partners/PDF/2178-001010.pdf
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Dell Forums › Dell Home (Inspiron, XPS, Studio) › 9300/XPS2 - 250GB hard disk upgrade