New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

I need HELP!!

post #1 of 16
9/29/07 at 1:55am
Thread Starter 
I will change my Processor, original is a 2x1,83 = T2400

I will take a T7400 2x2,17 Ghz --> IS match this

und i will take 4GB memory ram, is working this


My note book is a Dell 9400 Ispironwith 2x1,83ghz ,2 gb memory, 120gb 5400rpm, 7900 GS, vista ultimate
Reply
Reply
post #2 of 16
9/29/07 at 1:59am
i dont know if its the dewers scotch talking here, but i am having a little difficulty understanding what it is that you need help with.

are you attempting to upgrade you laptop with newer components?
Reply
Reply
post #3 of 16
9/29/07 at 2:04am
Quote:
Originally Posted by darthmorgoth View Post
i dont know if its the dewers scotch talking here, but i am having a little difficulty understanding what it is that you need help with.

are you attempting to upgrade you laptop with newer components?


I am not understanding quite well either.
Reply
Reply
post #4 of 16
9/29/07 at 9:26am
Thread Starter 
Im sorry for my bad english,yes im will upgrade my laptop with newer components?
my original prcessor is a T2400, and i will take a T7400
Reply
Reply
post #5 of 16
9/29/07 at 12:20pm
yes, it will work but there would be virtually no performance difference. THe only thing you would gain would be 64 bit functionality.


Upgrading to 4GB is fine, be aware you will only be able to use 3.25GB because of chipset limitations.
Reply
Reply
post #6 of 16
9/29/07 at 12:28pm


I also will be upgrading to 4 GB 3.25 is still good enough for me
Reply
Reply
post #7 of 16
10/1/07 at 2:53am
Thread Starter 
Can i take the T7400 for my notebook, is match this???

My Old one is T2400, i dont believe this?
Reply
Reply
post #8 of 16
10/1/07 at 2:05pm
Yes, The T7400 will work in your 9400. There will be no problem switching the two processors.
Reply
Reply
post #9 of 16
10/4/07 at 2:13pm
Thread Starter 
The last asks, witch need i? one with 479 pins or 478 pins?
Reply
Reply
post #10 of 16
10/4/07 at 4:30pm
478 pins

t74 is merom

it is better than the t24
Reply
Reply
post #11 of 16
10/4/07 at 4:33pm
the performance difference between the T2400-->T7400 is minimal & the only notable difference is the Merom being a 64 bit proc. If you don;t need 64 bit processing it's really a waste of money to go from 2.0--->2.16
Reply
Reply
post #12 of 16
10/4/07 at 4:36pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by SolApathy View Post
the only performance difference between the T2400-->T7400 is the Merom is a 64 bit proc. If you don;t need 64 bit processing it's really a waste of money to go from 2.16--->2.16
you allready said that. -from pc perspective: In our testing, the Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 mobile CPU has some significant improvements over the previous Core Duo processor. The biggest gains are seen in floating point and integer operations where some tests showed improvements of more than double! One of the short-comings of theCore Duo was it's weakness in crunching numbers, but no longer. The Core 2 Duo T7400 has shown itself to be a beast when it comes to chowing down those operations. Memory performance also showed significant gains, but not on the same scale as the CPU's ability to do math operations. Thanks to a 4MB cache and smart memory access, most of our memory tests showed a nice jump. Other applications had smaller, but noticeable gains including our media tests and gaming.
Reply
Reply
post #13 of 16
10/4/07 at 5:19pm
I've had a 1710 w/T2600 & one with a T7600G & the rest of the configuration was the same. synthetic benches are one thing, real performance numbers are quite another. Bar graphs & charts look cool, but don't mean much when you actually start doing real-world testing. I never noticed a lick of difference betwen the 2 at stock speeds.


I was just saying in terms of performance, you are not going to notice a difference. it's not like going from a Dothon 2.0 to a Merom 2.16.

I still have a T2600 in my 1405. I'm not saying there is not a performance difference in some apps, I am just saying that it's not noticeable for 90% of the users out there & i could think of better things to spend the money on than a proc upgrade that you aren't going to really see in terms of quantifiable performance.
Reply
Reply
post #14 of 16
10/4/07 at 8:18pm
he's going from a 1.83 core duo -> 2.13 core 2 duo, sol; i think you thought he had the 2ghz model not the 1.83ghz model. Considering the difference in clockspeed and difference between core duo and core 2 duo, there should be a decent performance improvement.
Reply
Reply
post #15 of 16
10/5/07 at 12:44am
yeah oops didn't notice that lol
Reply
Reply
post #16 of 16
10/10/07 at 10:25am
Thread Starter 
Hi
The processor is already runing. Thanks for Help!!
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home