NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Dell Forums › Dell Notebook Benchmarks › E1705/M1710/M1730 FRAPS Benchmarks Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

E1705/M1710/M1730 FRAPS Benchmarks Thread - Page 18  

post #341 of 494
12/16/07 at 3:58am
I haven't been running any tweaks lately. and those last benchmarks have been with no tweaks.

here is my Final Autoexec that I have finnished.

-- Shader settings
e_sky_update_rate = 0.12
e_max_entity_lights = 4
e_ram_maps = 0
e_vegetation_use_terrain_color = 0
e_sky_type = 1
q_ShaderFX = 1
q_ShaderGeneral = 0.25
q_ShaderHDR = 0
q_ShaderGlass = 0
q_ShaderMetal = 0
q_ShaderShadow = 1 change to 0 for better fps
q_ShaderVegetation = 0
r_EnvTexUpdateInterval = 0.1
r_TexturesFilteringQualit = 2
r_Beams = 3
r_BeamsMaxSlices = 100
r_BeamsDistFactor = 1 change to .3 for better fps
r_usepom = 1 change to 0 for better fps


-- Shadow settings
e_gsm_lods_num = 3
e_shadows_max_texture_size = 1024 change to 256 for better fps
e_shadows_cast_view_dist_ratio = 1 change to 0.3 or 0.2 for better fps
r_shadow_jittering = 1 change to 0 for better FPS


shadows and shaders really effect FPS.

with them tweaked you can achieve maximum FPS without losing too much crap.

cuz some candy you can live without

this is basically what I gave you before.

these are the basics of shadows/shaders.

from here tweaking these two things could make the difference of PLUS or MINUS 10-20 FPS. yes this is true
post #342 of 494
12/16/07 at 4:03am
if you want to really gain some FPS, take the shaders down, then tweak the shadows so they are their but not using up too much FPS.

also you don't need usepom.

there are some blood/ragdoll mods so the body's flop around after they are dead too it's pretty cool. nade the dead, lol.
post #343 of 494
12/16/07 at 4:31am
Thread Starter 
Are you sure that's with no tweaks? You must have the world's most powerful 7900...
post #344 of 494
12/16/07 at 4:43am
i just re-did my tests.

you were right.

I was running all medium @1900x1200 and 800x600.

I thought I was lying to myself to a while there. I was sooo sure.

when I tweak shaders/shadows I can run very high.

but not with those shaders cranked.
post #345 of 494
12/16/07 at 4:44am
Try 800x600 all medium settings and see what you get.
post #346 of 494
12/16/07 at 4:46am
i just uploaded a frap video to youtube. lol, it's like 10 seconds long.

i gotta find a better way to make vids.
post #347 of 494
12/16/07 at 5:05am
post link to utube vid
post #348 of 494
12/16/07 at 11:14am
I'll try the other resolutions today or tomorrow. But I did try some benchmarking with UT3. I used the following command line to run it, after I preset up the graphics I wanted: "C:\\Program Files\\Unreal Tournament 3\\Binaries\\UT3.exe" WAR-Serenity?numplay=24?timelimit=3?automatedperftesting=1 –unattended –novsync –fixedseed –CaptureFPSChartInfo=1 –nomoviestartup I got this from this site. This was at 1900x1200, Everything turned on high, PhysX On 2007-12-16 07:54:24 - UT3 Frames: 6374 - Time: 170621ms - Avg: 37.357 - Min: 23 - Max: 56 Here is the Log dump:
Code:
Init: CPU Page size=4096, Processors=2
Init: High frequency timer resolution =3.579545 MHz
Init: Memory total: Phys=3340264K Pagef=4194303K Virt=2097024K
Init: WinSock: version 1.1 (2.2), MaxSocks=32767, MaxUdp=65467
Init: Presizing for 83221 objects not considered by GC, pre-allocating 0 bytes.
Init: Object subsystem initialized
Init: Startup System Settings:
Init: System Settings:
Init: StaticDecals=true
Init: DynamicDecals=true
Init: DynamicLights=true
Init: DynamicShadows=true
Init: LightEnvironmentShadows=true
Init: CompositeDynamicLights=false
Init: DirectionalLightmaps=true
Init: MotionBlur=true
Init: DepthOfField=true
Init: Bloom=true
Init: QualityBloom=true
Init: Distortion=true
Init: DropParticleDistortion=false
Init: SpeedTreeLeaves=true
Init: SpeedTreeFronds=true
Init: OnlyStreamInTextures=true
Init: LensFlares=true
Init: FogVolumes=true
Init: FloatingPointRenderTargets=true
Init: Trilinear=true
Init: OneFrameThreadLag=false
Init: UseVsync=false
Init: UpscaleScreenPercentage=true
Init: Fullscreen=true
Init: AllowD3D10=true
Init: EnableHighPolyChars=true
Init: SkeletalMeshLODBias=0
Init: ParticleLODBias=0
Init: DetailMode=2
Init: ShadowFilterQualityBias=1
Init: MaxAnisotropy=16
Init: MaxMultisamples=1
Init: MinShadowResolution=32
Init: MaxShadowResolution=512
Init: ResX=1920
Init: ResY=1200
Init: ScreenPercentage=100.000
Init: SceneCaptureStreamingMultiplier=1.000
Init: FoliageDrawRadiusMultiplier=1.000
Init: ShadowTexelsPerPixel=2.000
Log: TEXTUREGROUP_World: (MinLODSize= 256,MaxLODSize=1024,LODBias=0)
Log: TEXTUREGROUP_WorldNormalMap: (MinLODSize= 512,MaxLODSize=1024,LODBias=1)
Log: TEXTUREGROUP_WorldSpecular: (MinLODSize= 256,MaxLODSize=1024,LODBias=1)
Log: TEXTUREGROUP_Character: (MinLODSize= 512,MaxLODSize=1024,LODBias=0)
Log: TEXTUREGROUP_CharacterNormalMap: (MinLODSize= 512,MaxLODSize=1024,LODBias=0)
Log: TEXTUREGROUP_CharacterSpecular: (MinLODSize= 512,MaxLODSize=1024,LODBias=0)
Log: TEXTUREGROUP_Weapon: (MinLODSize= 512,MaxLODSize=1024,LODBias=0)
Log: TEXTUREGROUP_WeaponNormalMap: (MinLODSize=1024,MaxLODSize=1024,LODBias=0)
Log: TEXTUREGROUP_WeaponSpecular: (MinLODSize= 512,MaxLODSize=1024,LODBias=0)
Log: TEXTUREGROUP_Vehicle: (MinLODSize=1024,MaxLODSize=2048,LODBias=0)
Log: TEXTUREGROUP_VehicleNormalMap: (MinLODSize=1024,MaxLODSize=2048,LODBias=1)
Log: TEXTUREGROUP_VehicleSpecular: (MinLODSize=1024,MaxLODSize=2048,LODBias=1)
Log: TEXTUREGROUP_Effects: (MinLODSize= 256,MaxLODSize=1024,LODBias=0)
Log: TEXTUREGROUP_Skybox: (MinLODSize= 512,MaxLODSize=2048,LODBias=0)
Log: TEXTUREGROUP_UI: (MinLODSize=1024,MaxLODSize=4096,LODBias=0)
Log: TEXTUREGROUP_LightAndShadowMap: (MinLODSize= 512,MaxLODSize=4096,LODBias=0)
Log: TEXTUREGROUP_RenderTarget: (MinLODSize= 1,MaxLODSize=4096,LODBias=0)
Init: Friendly System Settings:
Init: TextureDetail=Level5
Init: WorldDetail=Level5
Init: bUseVSync=0
Init: bUseMSAA=0
Init: ScreenPercentage=100
Init: UpscaleScreenPercentage=1
Init: ResX=1920
Init: ResY=1200
Init: Fullscreen=1
Init: OS stats:
Init: Windows XP Service Pack 2
Init: RemoteDesktop=0
Init: Memory stats:
Init: Physical: 3261MB
Init: Virtual: 2047MB
Init: PageFile: 4095MB
Init: CPU stats:
Init: MeasuredPerformanceTime: 336.421 (stored result)
Init: Hyperthreaded: 1
Init: NumProcessorsPerCPU: 1
Init: NumLogicalProcessors: 2
Init: NumPhysicalProcessors: 2
Init: MaxSpeed: 2793
Init: CurrentSpeed: 2793
Init: CoresPerProcessor: 2
Init: IsOnBattery: 0
Init: BatteryLevel: 100
Init: Manufacturer: Intel
Init: CPUName: Unknown INTEL CPU
Init: L1CacheSize: 32
Init: L2CacheSize: -1
Init: Architecture: x86
Init: GPU stats:
Init: VendorID: 000010DE
Init: DeviceID: 00000409
Init: DriverVersion: 6.14.11.6909
Init: DeviceName: NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT --NBF MobileForce Enhanced--
Init: DriverName: nv4_disp.dll
Init: PixelShaderVersion: 3
Init: VertexShaderVersion: 3
Init: VRAMQuantity: 256
Init: DedicatedVRAM: 240
Init: AdapterCount: 1
Init: SupportsHardwareTnL: 1
post #349 of 494
12/16/07 at 12:08pm
Ok, here are the request resolutions. I could not get the 8700Ms overclocked usint RivaTuner. Don't know if it is the 169.09 driver or RivaTuner working with the SLI config. I'll play around more later.

DX9 SLI 1440x900, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen, Medium Settings, No O/C, Win XP
2007-12-16 09:32:44 - crysis
Frames: 1968 - Time: 55022ms - Avg: 35.767 - Min: 27 - Max: 46

DX9 SLI 1600x900, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen, Medium Settings, No O/C, Win XP
2007-12-16 09:39:56 - crysis
Frames: 1977 - Time: 60464ms - Avg: 32.697 - Min: 25 - Max: 43

DX9 SLI 1600x1050, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen, Medium Settings, No O/C, Win XP
2007-12-16 09:43:05 - crysis
Frames: 1983 - Time: 59669ms - Avg: 33.233 - Min: 24 - Max: 41
post #350 of 494
12/16/07 at 3:53pm
Thread Starter 
800x600, No AA, No Vsync, Medium Settings, No Tweaks
2007-12-16 09:29:31 - Crysis
Frames: 2672 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 44.533 - Min: 30 - Max: 84

1440x900, No AA, No Vsync, Medium Settings, No Tweaks
2007-12-16 11:35:52 - Crysis
Frames: 1448 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 24.133 - Min: 19 - Max: 31

I'm in the 'Recovery' section, not going into any buildings during the benchmarks. Can someone provide a bench for those two resolutions in the same level? There's no reason I should be 10fps behind the pack.
post #351 of 494
12/16/07 at 5:46pm
1600x900
2007-12-16 13:43:14 - Crysis
Frames: 1407 - Time: 36767ms - Avg: 34.268 - Min: 28 - Max: 52

2007-12-16 13:41:56 - Crysis
Frames: 1345 - Time: 40481ms - Avg: 33.225 - Min: 29 - Max: 54

650/750 OC ALL MEDIUM SETTINGS.

in the recovery section going into the huts. smashing the huts. jumping down the cliff behind boat house and swiming down the side of cliff then climbing back up to huts.

1440x900
2007-12-16 13:51:57 - Crysis
Frames: 1890 - Time: 53232ms - Avg: 35.505 - Min: 26 - Max: 61 ---------------going into a few huts smashing them and then doing what I did above.

2007-12-16 13:52:53 - Crysis
Frames: 1093 - Time: 30882ms - Avg: 35.393 - Min: 24 - Max: 49 -----------not going into the huts and just walking around outside the recovery area.

i dunno, I think my best FPS is 1600x900. it's what I have always came back to. I get the best results from it.
post #352 of 494
12/16/07 at 6:00pm
Mikla if you want to Overlcock your 8700's you have to flash unlocked ROMS to it.

if you havent done this you can change the speeds and overclock with nibitor and nvflash with dumping each cards rom , changing the speeds and then nvflash.

you can use a USB bootable flash drive with nvflash on it and the roms.
post #353 of 494
12/16/07 at 6:26pm
Doesnt 1600x900 look stretched in some ways. I can only stand looking at 1027x768, 1280x1024,1600x1200 and 1920x1200. All other resolutions look awakard or stretched

Same w/ you guys or am I just the worlds biggest girl?
post #354 of 494
12/16/07 at 6:28pm
1600x900 looks fine. it's a 16:10 resolution. 1600x900, 16:10
post #355 of 494
12/16/07 at 6:38pm
how long did it take you guys to throw in those new vid cards?
post #356 of 494
12/16/07 at 6:39pm
I use: Crysis Benchmark Tool With the demo version of the game. That way I know my FPS is consistant from one bench to the next.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TurbodTalon View Post
I'm in the 'Recovery' section, not going into any buildings during the benchmarks. Can someone provide a bench for those two resolutions in the same level? There's no reason I should be 10fps behind the pack.
I just hit F11 as soon as the game starts to benchmark in FRAPS.
post #357 of 494
12/16/07 at 6:49pm
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by diefool View Post
1440x900 2007-12-16 13:51:57 - Crysis Frames: 1890 - Time: 53232ms - Avg: 35.505 - Min: 26 - Max: 61 ---------------going into a few huts smashing them and then doing what I did above. 2007-12-16 13:52:53 - Crysis Frames: 1093 - Time: 30882ms - Avg: 35.393 - Min: 24 - Max: 49 -----------not going into the huts and just walking around outside the recovery area. i dunno, I think my best FPS is 1600x900. it's what I have always came back to. I get the best results from it.
I find this highly odd, but your numbers do the talking. Maybe there's something I'm overlooking.
post #358 of 494
12/16/07 at 6:55pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghazgull013 View Post
how long did it take you guys to throw in those new vid cards?

first time I took my sweet time and about 2 hours later....

now 12 minutes flat.
post #359 of 494
12/16/07 at 6:56pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by TurbodTalon View Post
I find this highly odd, but your numbers do the talking. Maybe there's something I'm overlooking.


i know. you have a higer volted card with higher clocks.
post #360 of 494
12/16/07 at 7:42pm
2007-12-16 15:36:34 - Crysis
Frames: 1728 - Time: 51974ms - Avg: 33.247 - Min: 22 - Max: 52

2007-12-16 15:39:28 - Crysis
Frames: 850 - Time: 24882ms - Avg: 34.161 - Min: 22 - Max: 49

messing around with Geometric Delta Clocks.

I am happy with my resluts . I think I did an OC of 625/750 flashed with a geometric DELTA of 25. so my Geo clock will kick in when in a 3d Aplication to 650.

with the same results as a straight OC of 650/750

I monitored the results with RIVA TUNER>

it appears that My temp is lower too. so my OC doesn't have to be 650 I can use 625 and get 25mhz more with delta and achieve more or less the same performance.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Dell Notebook Benchmarks
This thread is locked  
NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Dell Forums › Dell Notebook Benchmarks › E1705/M1710/M1730 FRAPS Benchmarks Thread