NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Dell Forums › Dell Notebook Benchmarks › E1705/M1710/M1730 FRAPS Benchmarks Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

E1705/M1710/M1730 FRAPS Benchmarks Thread - Page 25  

post #481 of 494
3/15/08 at 10:03pm
Just OC'd my card for the first time.

Did it with STALKER. Used 1280x1024 MAX settings all the eye candy on with 600/700 clock. I was in the level I consider the worst, lost of shading and shadows, the one where you enter the tunnel and bloodsuckers plague the area. . Usually when I get here it drops to the 20's with normal coclks, but the upwards clolcks of 100 each yielded about 10 more FPS.

2008-03-15 20:53:49 - XR_3DA
Frames: 2350 - Time: 69485ms - Avg: 33.820 - Min: 2 - Max: 46

Im interested to see what 600/800 would do.

My temps peak were
CPU-73
GPU-83 (with offset of 8 degrees)
post #482 of 494
3/18/08 at 4:00am
Still staying pretty cool ghaz,did overclocking increase the temp much.

Nice FPS increase from a pretty mild overclock.

Its a pity "clear sky" has been delayed,I hope their not going to start delaying everytime it gets within a couple of weeks of the listed release date.
post #483 of 494
3/18/08 at 4:05am
Quote:
Originally Posted by gerryjoson View Post
Still staying pretty cool ghaz,did overclocking increase the temp much. Nice FPS increase from a pretty mild overclock. Its a pity "clear sky" has been delayed,I hope their not going to start delaying everytime it gets within a couple of weeks of the listed release date.
Yea it did stay fairly cool, hopefully teh AS5 is doing its job. I took it to 600/800 but it started artifacting so i lowered the clocks. Im going to try it again, see if I can find the sweet spot for stalker so it doesnt artifact. Yea i really want Clear Sky, they better stop with these dalays. They are noe at Q2 2008. If I see 'Q3 2008' I will pull my hair out. But I can be patient, GSC had to cut out alot of content from SoC from pressure from THQ to release it. I think Clear Sky will be what GSC had originally intended Stalker to really be.
post #484 of 494
3/22/08 at 8:03pm
Just a comparison of a few games with SLI enabled and disabled

2008-03-23 10:39:47 - XR_3DA
Frames: 2138 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 35.633 - Min: 26 - Max: 46

2008-03-23 10:44:32 - XR_3DA
Frames: 3110 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 51.833 - Min: 38 - Max: 65

2008-03-23 10:50:51 - witcher
Frames: 3033 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 50.550 - Min: 17 - Max: 74

2008-03-23 10:56:03 - witcher
Frames: 2214 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 36.900 - Min: 14 - Max: 47

2008-03-23 11:02:41 - Crysis
Frames: 2027 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 33.783 - Min: 22 - Max: 62

2008-03-23 11:10:55 - Crysis
Frames: 2886 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 48.100 - Min: 18 - Max: 69

2008-03-23 11:17:17 - Bioshock
Frames: 3586 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 59.767 - Min: 24 - Max: 82

2008-03-23 11:21:54 - Bioshock
Frames: 2584 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 43.067 - Min: 9 - Max: 72

2008-03-23 11:28:51 - FarCry
Frames: 3072 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 51.200 - Min: 41 - Max: 61

2008-03-23 11:33:26 - FarCry
Frames: 4636 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 77.267 - Min: 58 - Max: 93

Faster ones are obviously with sli enabled,I took great care to do exactly the same thing with each run so to minimize any errors
post #485 of 494
3/22/08 at 8:45pm
Make sure you tell us your settings gerry and the resolution you used.

Im most interested in the stalker benchmark
post #486 of 494
3/22/08 at 9:15pm
The Stalker benches were at 1920x1200 and every setting on or at max except vertsync,same with bioshock and far cry.I did do a couple of BMP screenshots of the stalker settings but are too large to post apparently.

The Crysis settings were as I posted above,and the witcher was at 1920x1200 everything on max except no shadows,1xAF,no AA.

I probably wasn't in the most demanding part of stalker,but I was more interested in the comparison between SLI and non-SLI

Do you have a particular part of stalker you would like me to FRAP?
post #487 of 494
3/22/08 at 9:57pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by gerryjoson View Post
The Stalker benches were at 1920x1200 and every setting on or at max except vertsync,same with bioshock and far cry.I did do a couple of BMP screenshots of the stalker settings but are too large to post apparently.

The Crysis settings were as I posted above,and the witcher was at 1920x1200 everything on max except no shadows,1xAF,no AA.

I probably wasn't in the most demanding part of stalker,but I was more interested in the comparison between SLI and non-SLI

Do you have a particular part of stalker you would like me to FRAP?
Good work Jerry. I guess I was wrong in that other thread, but I would swear that my machine rns smoother in single card mode. there would only be one way to know for sure, I will have to run somem test also..
post #488 of 494
3/22/08 at 10:05pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by gerryjoson View Post
Do you have a particular part of stalker you would like me to FRAP?
haha no thats ok. BTW if you try to upload images I find that BMP have trouble. For the easiest and most convenient save images as JPEG, all the major uploading sites seem to take nicely to them over BMP images. Why, only god knows Nice benches, thanks for the info
post #489 of 494
3/23/08 at 2:17am
Just wondering to anyone with a FX 2500/3500 7900/7950GTX whats is your card overclocked to?

Stalker seems to lock up on me/ artifact at like 630/730

I know the safe mark is like 600/800 and this is just slightly past it. Could it be my video driver Im using (84.63-nvidia.com)

Perhaps try the 169.04 driver for OC'ing better?

Or do i need to make my clock 800 and no 730?
post #490 of 494
3/23/08 at 1:40pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghazgull013 View Post
Just wondering to anyone with a FX 2500/3500 7900/7950GTX whats is your card overclocked to? Stalker seems to lock up on me/ artifact at like 630/730 I know the safe mark is like 600/800 and this is just slightly past it. Could it be my video driver Im using (84.63-nvidia.com) Perhaps try the 169.04 driver for OC'ing better? Or do i need to make my clock 800 and no 730?
Hi Ghaz. I can't tell with my 7950GTX, but with my former 7900GS Stalker was the game I used for benchmarking and artifacting purposes and anything above 740 (RAM) would yield artifacts.
post #491 of 494
3/23/08 at 7:40pm
Thanks Savat,

Ill look more into it.
post #492 of 494
4/25/08 at 12:35pm
Saw this old thread from jerry's post on sli/non sli

I settled for reducing the resolution on stalker; I actually prefer it like this

1280x800
object dynamic lighting
quality max (for the toggliing that does in advanced tab), with NPC flashlights on

I haven't tweaked anything else but i find it runs very fast ~60fps using fraps and for me is great game experience. I like the game, its one I'll play intermittently over a long period

*I ahd to reload it from scratch and only have v 1.0001 when started playing;
for me it runs better and I don't want to start again, so not going to patch it
post #493 of 494
5/5/08 at 6:17am
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZX81 View Post
Saw this old thread from jerry's post on sli/non sli

I settled for reducing the resolution on stalker; I actually prefer it like this

1280x800
object dynamic lighting
quality max (for the toggliing that does in advanced tab), with NPC flashlights on

I haven't tweaked anything else but i find it runs very fast ~60fps using fraps and for me is great game experience. I like the game, its one I'll play intermittently over a long period

*I ahd to reload it from scratch and only have v 1.0001 when started playing;
for me it runs better and I don't want to start again, so not going to patch it


Hopefully you'll give us an update with your new M6300
post #494 of 494
5/5/08 at 3:42pm
please submit here from now on

http://www.notebookforums.com/review...-benchmark.php
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Dell Notebook Benchmarks
This thread is locked  
NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Dell Forums › Dell Notebook Benchmarks › E1705/M1710/M1730 FRAPS Benchmarks Thread