NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Dell Notebook Forums › Dell Notebook Benchmarks › E1705/M1710/M1730 FRAPS Benchmarks Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

E1705/M1710/M1730 FRAPS Benchmarks Thread - Page 5  

post #81 of 494
10/20/07 at 4:45am
I finally put my 7200rpm hdd in my rig, and my t7600 proc..

here is my Bioshock 1900x1200 maxed with everything at max including vsync except for the last direct10 thing..


2007-10-20 00:40:58 - Bioshock
Frames: 1416 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 39.782 - Min: 29 - Max: 47

oh and a fresh install of xp

oc'd 650/750
post #82 of 494
10/20/07 at 1:59pm
Thread Starter 
Could you run some benchmarks at 1440x900? I don't want to say "OK, everyone run their benchmarks at MY res", but we can't compare if they're not the same. BTW, nice Bioshock bench, especially at 19x12.
post #83 of 494
10/20/07 at 3:31pm
Running Vista Ultimate

1920 X 1200 Max Out - Dricet X 10
BioShock 2007-10-20-13-40-13-93
Franes 1738 Time 6000 Min 13 Max 40 Avg 28.983

1920 X 1200 Max Out
UT3Demo 2007-10-18-16-27-18-30
Frames 1404 Time 6000 Min 15 Max 31 Avg 23.4

1920 X 1200 Max out
FFOW-Beta 2007-10-20-12-11-45-94
Frames 907 6000 Min 3 Max 21 Avg 15.117

1440 X 900 eveything to Med
Crysis 2007-10-20-13-04-16-16
Frames 745 6000 Min 7 Max 20 Avg 12.417
post #84 of 494
10/20/07 at 5:44pm
I think that Xp runs game better.

look at the killer m1710 rig above me nice rig btw..!!

You should get better fps than that. I get better fps than that.

Vista is a huge barrier for FPS and gaming. and everything else in general.

Vista the ultamate hinderer.
post #85 of 494
10/20/07 at 6:07pm
2007-10-20 14:05:48 - Bioshock
Frames: 1878 - Time: 47321ms - Avg: 39.686 - Min: 27 - Max: 61


fresh reboot stock stock 7950 clocks, 1440x900, maxed
post #86 of 494
10/20/07 at 6:10pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeForceTony View Post
Whoa whoa whoa... Where the hell did THAT come from? "Personal pettyness"? Umm... Since when? Do you think we're gonna nix support for anything but what we deem "good enough" to use our drivers from the mix? Man, if that were the case, we wouldn't support the GeForce FX Go. Maybe you'll take the time to look into the MobileForce drivers (other than the 9x.xx drivers) and see that there's support for not only the GeForce FX Go, but also the GeForce 8x00M cards .

Make sure you know what you're talking about before you start talking crap about people that aren't even involved in this thread, not to mention someone not involved in this thread, and who's a MODERATOR.


I won't ask for an apology from you, and I don't expect one, just make sure that next time, think before you start shouting your mouth off... For your own sake.


Yeah,ok,like I said....some silly comments,it wasn't really aimed at you but whatever,I apologize again.

Are you [mobileforce]going to try and support SLI users ?from what I was lead to believe is that SLI users don't have much choice but to use the manufacturers drivers,which I didn't know before this week and I suppose in retrospect is a good reason to not want SLI....I see there is AW 9750 people wondering the same.

After a good start with my laptop,I am now running into a lot of compatabilty issues with graw2 demo,far cry,HL2.

Zyb,what driver did you use?

Nice fps in bioshock @ native from diefool and smodeus....especially in vista.
post #87 of 494
10/20/07 at 6:33pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by gerryjoson View Post
Are you [mobileforce]going to try and support SLI users ?from what I was lead to believe is that SLI users don't have much choice but to use the manufacturers drivers,which I didn't know before this week and I suppose in retrospect is a good reason to not want SLI....I see there is AW 9750 people wondering the same.
It depends on whether or not NVIDIA decides to step it up with their drivers. We (MobileForce; Krayziepop and myself) can't do anything unless NVIDIA steps it up and starts adding SLi support to their drivers. Pieter at LaptopVideo2Go is stuck in the same boat. It's the ForceWare drivers themselves, and no modding we can do can expose and/or fix SLi and its issues.
post #88 of 494
10/20/07 at 9:04pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeForceTony View Post
It depends on whether or not NVIDIA decides to step it up with their drivers. We (MobileForce; Krayziepop and myself) can't do anything unless NVIDIA steps it up and starts adding SLi support to their drivers. Pieter at LaptopVideo2Go is stuck in the same boat. It's the ForceWare drivers themselves, and no modding we can do can expose and/or fix SLi and its issues.

Bummer.....hopefully this will change.....thanks for the reply.
post #89 of 494
10/20/07 at 9:12pm
Thanks By the Way yeah Vista is not to great about getting the max out FPS it's more about BAM LOOK AT MY PRETTY SHINY SKIN but don't ask me to tranfer anything within the hour.

Yeah Vista is a dog of an operating system. I also think the Drivers or a big thing for vista they all suck.

Quote:
Originally Posted by diefool View Post
I think that Xp runs game better.

look at the killer m1710 rig above me nice rig btw..!!

You should get better fps than that. I get better fps than that.

Vista is a huge barrier for FPS and gaming. and everything else in general.

Vista the ultamate hinderer.
post #90 of 494
10/21/07 at 7:21pm
Thread Starter 
2007-10-19 05:33:48 - STALKER (1440x900 Full GFX)
Frames: 1356 - Time: 31621ms - Avg: 42.882 - Min: 37 - Max: 49

2007-10-21 14:17:47 - Bioshock (1440x900 Full GFX)
Frames: 4766 - Time: 92641ms - Avg: 51.445 - Min: 23 - Max: 85

2007-10-21 16:06:26 - GRAW2 (1440x900 Full GFX)
Frames: 1348 - Time: 28546ms - Avg: 47.222 - Min: 29 - Max: 74

2007-10-21 16:55:12 - UT3Demo Shangri La Map (1440x900 Full GFX)
Frames: 2204 - Time: 42196ms - Avg: 52.232 - Min: 37 - Max: 62

CSS Stress Test 214.52 FPS
post #91 of 494
10/24/07 at 10:31pm
2007-10-24 06:27:50 - graw2
Frames: 1235 - Time: 40394ms - Avg: 30.574 - Min: 21 - Max: 40

1900x1200 everything cranked

stock 7950 clocks
post #92 of 494
10/27/07 at 5:48pm
Thread Starter 
2007-10-19 05:33:48 - STALKER (1440x900 Full GFX)
Frames: 1356 - Time: 31621ms - Avg: 42.882 - Min: 37 - Max: 49

2007-10-21 14:17:47 - Bioshock (1440x900 Full GFX)
Frames: 4766 - Time: 92641ms - Avg: 51.445 - Min: 23 - Max: 85

2007-10-21 16:06:26 - GRAW2 (1440x900 Full GFX)
Frames: 1348 - Time: 28546ms - Avg: 47.222 - Min: 29 - Max: 74

2007-10-21 16:55:12 - UT3Demo (1440x900 Full GFX)
Frames: 2204 - Time: 42196ms - Avg: 52.232 - Min: 37 - Max: 62

CSS Stress Test 214.52 (1440x900 Full GFX)

2007-10-27 14:43:22 - Crysis DEMO (1440x900 Full GFX)
Frames: 976 - Time: 69032ms - Avg: 14.138 - Min: 7 - Max: 21

And for those of you who didn't know, Crysis comes with built-in GPU and CPU benchmarking programs. They're in the Bin32 folder.

Running GPU benchmark 1
Results will depend on current system settings
Press any key to continue . . .
Running...
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 169.48s, Average FPS: 11.80
Min FPS: 1.96 at frame 661, Max FPS: 15.74 at frame 962
Average Tri/Sec: -11575356, Tri/Frame: -980882
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -0.93

Running CPU benchmark 1
Results will depend on current system settings
Press any key to continue . . .
Running...
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 1500, Recorded Time: 44.62s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 138.06s, Average FPS: 10.86
Min FPS: 4.28 at frame 466, Max FPS: 14.43 at frame 95
Average Tri/Sec: 12330319, Tri/Frame: 1134916
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.63
post #93 of 494
10/28/07 at 3:34am
2007-10-27 23:31:22 - Crysis
Frames: 1193 - Time: 33395ms - Avg: 35.724 - Min: 26 - Max: 48

1280x960 all setting to medium..

hey, thats no so bad really. very very playble. 163.44 xp32bit drivers and fx2500 625/730
w00t!

Running GPU benchmark 1
Results will depend on current system settings
Press any key to continue . . .
Running...
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 79.11s, Average FPS: 25.28
Min FPS: 5.73 at frame 1927, Max FPS: 35.52 at frame 987
Average Tri/Sec: 18915582, Tri/Frame: 748220
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.23



i guess its the same res I had it at last time i played. so it would be 1280x960 medium. very very playbel.. hmm. not so bad.
post #94 of 494
10/29/07 at 8:34pm
Thread Starter 
Well Diefool, I'm not to the point where I'm willing to turn down the graphics settings and run a lower resolution. I'm only running 1440x900 as it is.
There's no way that the final version of Crysis will be this demanding. I know guys with SLI 8800's in their desktops that can't run it. Bioshock was groundbreaking as far as GFX go, and I could run it just fine on highest settings. How could a game that debuts only a couple of months later be so demanding? I think once the final version hits stores, it'll only be slightly hungrier than Bioshock is.
post #95 of 494
10/29/07 at 9:07pm
I agree, I tried playing it at those settings and it started to suck big time!

just didn't look that good.

i like bio shock better anyways.

this game is over hyped imo.
post #96 of 494
10/29/07 at 11:20pm
Crysis went gold today and the build of the demo is like 10/22 so unless they pulled some serious magic out of there hats its going to run exactly the same . this game much like farcry is all about pushing the tech envelope so its really built for future rigs which is kind of sad .
post #97 of 494
10/29/07 at 11:30pm
How silly. How can you compare Bioshocks indoor smaller levels to the openess of Crysis?
post #98 of 494
10/30/07 at 12:22am
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Philljc View Post
How silly. How can you compare Bioshocks indoor smaller levels to the openess of Crysis?
If you've got something personal to say, PM me. I don't think that's 'silly' at all, considering the hype surrounding both games as far as what will run it and what won't. Maybe your next comment will contribute to the conversation.
post #99 of 494
10/30/07 at 12:40am
When did hype surrounding games directly control how a game will perform? If you cant figure out how an indoor game like Bioshock runs better than an outdoor game like Crysis then theres something wrong. And thats half the problem with you people.

You act as if all these games run on the same engine made by the same developers, and if you didnt think like that you woudlnt have to ask "why doesnt it run the same as *whatever*". Go do some research and you will find out why it wont run the magical way you expect it to.

I can send that in a PM too if it makes you feel better.
post #100 of 494
10/30/07 at 2:00am
Hey guys Step back & relax a bit. Crysis & Bio look great, but you cannot compare the FPS of an indoor, highly controlled enviroment to an outdoor enviroment with a considerable amount of dynamic features that make it ultra-realistic.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Dell Notebook Benchmarks
This thread is locked  
NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Dell Notebook Forums › Dell Notebook Benchmarks › E1705/M1710/M1730 FRAPS Benchmarks Thread