New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

How will it go? Crysis. - Page 6

post #101 of 129
10/28/07 at 3:41pm
Here's my specs.

Inspiron 9400
1.83 Ghz Yonah
2 Ghz 667 DDR Ram
7950 GTX 512MB
7200 RPM 160GB HD
Windows Vista 32-bit
169.01 Drivers

I can only run Crysis in 1024x640 with most effects on high cept shaders on medium, physics and shadows on low, textures on high. Get on average in dense brush with far draw distance about 23-25 fps. Quite disappointed considering I can run Stalker in 1920x1200 Max settings on everything.
Reply
Reply
post #102 of 129
10/28/07 at 7:18pm
At 1280x800 I got:
about 10 fps with high detail - came down to 2 if i made rapid turns
about 15 to 25 fps with medium detail - playable but painful
about 20 to 40 fps with low detail (most of the time 30) - I finished the demo on these settings, but it looked like crap

Then i went down on the res to 1000x600 (dont remeber exactly) a set the details to med (except for shadows, those were low). This resulted in 20-30 fps with an avg of 25. Plus it didnt look like total crap.

As if for me this games doesnt seem finished. Both code optimization and proper video drivers. And if it is - than thanks, i'll pass. It will have to wait for a better rig...

Btw, i installed the new beta drivers 169.01, but they changed nothing. I took them from laptopvideo2go.com. Did they work for any of you?
Reply
Reply
post #103 of 129
10/28/07 at 7:20pm
Oh, forgot to mention my specs:
Dell Inspiron E1705, Intel Core Duo T2600 2,16Ghz, 2GB RAM 667Mhz, Geforce Go 7900gs @ 460/550, 80GB HDD @ 7200 RPM, Win XP Home XP2 32 bit, WUXGA
Reply
Reply
post #104 of 129
10/28/07 at 7:22pm
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tandaradei View Post
At 1280x800 I got: about 10 fps with high detail - came down to 2 if i made rapid turns about 15 to 25 fps with medium detail - playable but painful about 20 to 40 fps with low detail (most of the time 30) - I finished the demo on these settings, but it looked like crap Then i went down on the res to 1000x600 (dont remeber exactly) a set the details to med (except for shadows, those were low). This resulted in 20-30 fps with an avg of 25. Plus it didnt look like total crap. As if for me this games doesnt seem finished. Both code optimization and proper video drivers. And if it is - than thanks, i'll pass. It will have to wait for a better rig... Btw, i installed the new beta drivers 169.01, but they changed nothing. I took them from laptopvideo2go.com. Did they work for any of you?
It helps if you post the specs you ran it on. edit: im too slow.
Reply
Reply
post #105 of 129
10/31/07 at 12:14pm
Definitley worth trying the new 169.04 driver. I would say i got a 10fps boost. I can now run at 1024x768 with all HIGH at about 25fps. Thats on a bios modded 7900gs with a core2 duo t5600
Reply
Reply
post #106 of 129
10/31/07 at 12:34pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by jwilson02 View Post
Definitley worth trying the new 169.04 driver. I would say i got a 10fps boost. I can now run at 1024x768 with all HIGH at about 25fps. Thats on a bios modded 7900gs with a core2 duo t5600

wow thats excellent news. any1 else can confirm this?
Reply
Reply
post #107 of 129
11/1/07 at 9:36am
Thread Starter 
It didnt help me at all, same as the last 169's. I cant wait to put XP on this thing and see how it goes.
Reply
Reply
post #108 of 129
11/1/07 at 11:01am
I'm running Crysis decently well on my dell. I'm running 94.20 Xtreme-G drivers.
I have resolution set at 1280x800, all settings on medium except for physics, texture detail, and post processing, which are all set on high.
I'm pulling low 20 frame-rates consistently, and the game looks awesome.
Looking carefully at the textures, the detail, and all the other graphical improvements even at such a low resolution, I can definitely say it looks better than any other game right now easily.
Reply
Reply
post #109 of 129
11/1/07 at 11:53am
20 fps in a shooter is just unacceptable to me.
Reply
Reply
post #110 of 129
11/3/07 at 3:46pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by zzpulp View Post
20 fps in a shooter is just unacceptable to me.



I personally cannot deal with anything less than about 30fps and enjoy playing. I mean, the game story would have to be 5 times as amazing for me to play a game at 20fps
Reply
Reply
post #111 of 129
11/3/07 at 5:30pm
so has anyone tried this game with their m1730? if so, how are the framerates and at what detail level do you play it on?
Reply
Reply
post #112 of 129
11/3/07 at 6:06pm
i got 20 fps w/ bioshock and it ran pretty darn smooth
Reply
Reply
post #113 of 129
11/3/07 at 6:57pm
bless your eyes
Reply
Reply
post #114 of 129
11/3/07 at 9:04pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdonket View Post
bless your eyes
Yea it pays to look at the sun on a nice day for 20 minutes. And they said it had no negative effects
Reply
Reply
post #115 of 129
11/3/07 at 11:05pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghazgull013 View Post
Yea it pays to look at the sun on a nice day for 20 minutes. And they said it had no negative effects

I think everybody just has different tolerances somewhat based on the eyes, some people can't stand below 50, and i personally start to notice at under 30, however the lower you can go, the better
Reply
Reply
post #116 of 129
11/3/07 at 11:05pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdonket View Post
I think everybody just has different tolerances somewhat based on the eyes, some people can't stand below 50, and i personally start to notice at under 30, however the lower you can go, the better
Thats what she said
Reply
Reply
post #117 of 129
11/4/07 at 8:35pm
I loaded up a savegame to test the drivers (should've used the built in benchmark) and I didn't see any difference between 84.63, 92.77, 156.55, and 169.04 on my 7800 GTX Go.

In defense of my crappy testing method, I don't think I really care about average framerates as much as increasing the bottom end, and none of these drivers did that. So, I have to conclude that my laptop is the bottleneck here.
Reply
Reply
post #118 of 129
11/4/07 at 10:38pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Argh View Post
so has anyone tried this game with their m1730? if so, how are the framerates and at what detail level do you play it on?

cmon, anyone?
Reply
Reply
post #119 of 129
11/4/07 at 10:48pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Argh View Post
cmon, anyone?
Hunt down the 1730 owners and PM them
Reply
Reply
post #120 of 129
11/5/07 at 12:04am
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghazgull013 View Post
Hunt down the 1730 owners and PM them

i expected them to be in here giving their results and to my surprise not a single post....
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home