It's a beautiful game, no doubt. But what's the point in having those graphical settings if there isn't a (consumer) computer on the planet that will run it? I got 10 -15 fps with all settings on high. There were additional settings for ultra high that were locked out. It's a demo too, which means it's hopefully going to be a bit more optimized when the game hits the stores.
1920x1080, Ultra settings/4X (Vista) I get 31 FPS on the desktop rig in my sig 169.01 drivers. I am really not impressed with the additional effects DX10 brings at this point. Woo sunbeams (lame) and will be playing crysis under DX9
Ultra is only available on Vista & if you have a DX10 card.
My youngest boy helped himself to my powerhouse M1710 this morning while I was sleeping and dropped it down the stairs. For some reason it is not working all that well..lol...kids...His butt is gonna be red for awhile. Oh well that's what I bought CC for.
1920x1080, Ultra settings/4X (Vista) I get 31 FPS on the desktop rig in my sig 169.01 drivers.
I'm alittle confused on how your getting that good of performance on those settings. I'm getting an average of about ~11 fps on those settings and 1680x1050 res on my C2D 3.3 GHz and 8800GTX (625/2000) rig. I know you have your CPU at 3.9 GHz and you're using an overclocked 8800ultra, but I don't even think 2x 8800GTX are getting that good on those settings.
This article also agrees with the performance I'm getting, so it's not something wrong with my desktop: