New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

NBF MobileForce VS 169.04 M6

Poll Results: Are you satisfied with this driver and recommend it for other users?

 
  • 95% (19)
    Yes
  • 5% (1)
    No
20 Total Votes  
post #1 of 23
Thread Starter 
NBF MobileForce VS 169.04 M6
DIRECT DOWNLOAD (NOT AVAILABLE) MIRROR 1 Operating System: Microsoft Windows Vista 32-Bit Driver Version: 7.15.11.6904 NBF MobileForce Custom INF Tweaks Version: 6.03.52 Driver Date: 10/28/2007 Driver Size: 33,714,317 bytes (32.1MB) MD5 Hash: 0118F735D7D316134B57F35C5376C107 Please make sure you compare the MD5 Hash and Driver Size of the file you've downloaded to make sure you are getting a Genuine NBF MobileForce Driver, and not one that has been tampered with! ---Release Notes--- Continuing upon the, for the most part, amazing abilities of NVIDIA's new ForceWare 169-Series drivers, the new 169.04 is definitely a worthy successor. This new driver improves upon the impressive performance of 169.01 in (as far as can be seen) every way, so if you're running 169.01, it's a good bet you'd do better with 169.04. Give them a try and report back!! ---Other Information--- If you are updating your driver, please follow the directions in THIS THREAD. If you don't use follow these directions, and whine about problems with the driver not working properly, we're going to ask you to use follow these directions anyways, so please, update your driver properly . . . We will thank you later. Please post RESPONSIBLY!!! We will answer your question as soon as possible. All issues and/or concerns regarding this particular MobileForce driver are to be confined to this thread. Any other topics created regarding issues with this or any other driver will be REMOVED. Please, confine all discussion and feedback to this thread. It makes our job easier, and it makes it easier for others to view feedback on the driver release. ---Supported Video Devices---
Code:
NVIDIA_C51.DEV_0243.1  = "NVIDIA C51"
NVIDIA_C51.DEV_0244.1  = "NVIDIA GeForce Go 6150"
NVIDIA_C51.DEV_0247.1  = "NVIDIA GeForce Go 6100"
NVIDIA_C67.DEV_0530.1  = "NVIDIA GeForce 7190M / nForce 650M"
NVIDIA_C67.DEV_0531.1  = "NVIDIA GeForce 7150M / nForce 630M"
NVIDIA_C67.DEV_0532.1  = "NVIDIA MCP67M"
NVIDIA_C67.DEV_0533.1  = "NVIDIA GeForce 7000M / nForce 610M"
NVIDIA_C67.DEV_053F.1  = "NVIDIA MCP67M "
NVIDIA_G70.DEV_0098.1  = "NVIDIA GeForce Go 7800"
NVIDIA_G70.DEV_0099.1  = "NVIDIA GeForce Go 7800 GTX"
NVIDIA_G71.DEV_0297.1  = "NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX"
NVIDIA_G71.DEV_0298.1  = "NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GS"
NVIDIA_G71.DEV_0299.1  = "NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GTX"
NVIDIA_G71.DEV_029A.1  = "NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M"
NVIDIA_G71.DEV_029B.1  = "NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M"
NVIDIA_G71.DEV_029C.1  = "NVIDIA G71GLM"
NVIDIA_G71.DEV_029D.1  = "NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M"
NVIDIA_G72.DEV_01D4.1  = "NVIDIA GeForce Go 7350"
NVIDIA_G72.DEV_01D6.1  = "NVIDIA GeForce Go 7200"
NVIDIA_G72.DEV_01D7.1  = "NVIDIA GeForce Go 7300"
NVIDIA_G72.DEV_01D8.1  = "NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400"
NVIDIA_G72.DEV_01D9.1  = "NVIDIA GeForce Go 7450"
NVIDIA_G72.DEV_01DA.1  = "NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M"
NVIDIA_G72.DEV_01DB.1  = "NVIDIA Quadro NVS 120M"
NVIDIA_G72.DEV_01DC.1  = "NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M"
NVIDIA_G73.DEV_038B.1  = "NVIDIA G73M-X"
NVIDIA_G73.DEV_0397.1  = "NVIDIA GeForce Go 7700"
NVIDIA_G73.DEV_0398.1  = "NVIDIA GeForce Go 7600"
NVIDIA_G73.DEV_0399.1  = "NVIDIA GeForce Go 7600 GT"
NVIDIA_G73.DEV_039A.1  = "NVIDIA Quadro NVS 300M"
NVIDIA_G73.DEV_039B.1  = "NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 SE"
NVIDIA_G73.DEV_039C.1  = "NVIDIA Quadro FX 550M"
NVIDIA_G84.DEV_0407.1  = "NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT"
NVIDIA_G84.DEV_0408.1  = "NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GTS"
NVIDIA_G84.DEV_0409.1  = "NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT"
NVIDIA_G84.DEV_040A.1  = "NVIDIA Quadro NVS 370M"
NVIDIA_G84.DEV_040B.1  = "NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M"
NVIDIA_G84.DEV_040C.1  = "NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M"
NVIDIA_G84.DEV_040D.1  = "NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M"
NVIDIA_G86.DEV_0425.1  = "NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GS"
NVIDIA_G86.DEV_0426.1  = "NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GT"
NVIDIA_G86.DEV_0427.1  = "NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS"
NVIDIA_G86.DEV_0428.1  = "NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G"
NVIDIA_G86.DEV_0429.1  = "NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M"
NVIDIA_G86.DEV_042A.1  = "NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M"
NVIDIA_G86.DEV_042B.1  = "NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M"
NVIDIA_G86.DEV_042D.1  = "NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M"
NVIDIA_NV31.DEV_0316.1 = "NVIDIA NV31M "
NVIDIA_NV31.DEV_0317.1 = "NVIDIA NV31M Pro "
NVIDIA_NV31.DEV_031A.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5600 "
NVIDIA_NV31.DEV_031B.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5650 "
NVIDIA_NV31.DEV_031C.1 = "NVIDIA Quadro FX Go 700 "
NVIDIA_NV31.DEV_031D.1 = "NVIDIA NV31GLM "
NVIDIA_NV31.DEV_031E.1 = "NVIDIA NV31GLM Pro"
NVIDIA_NV31.DEV_031F.1 = "NVIDIA NV31GLM Pro "
NVIDIA_NV34.DEV_0324.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5200 64MB"
NVIDIA_NV34.DEV_0325.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5250/5500 "
NVIDIA_NV34.DEV_0328.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5200 32/64M "
NVIDIA_NV34.DEV_032C.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 53x0 "
NVIDIA_NV34.DEV_032D.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5100 "
NVIDIA_NV36.DEV_0347.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5700 "
NVIDIA_NV36.DEV_0348.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5700  "
NVIDIA_NV36.DEV_0349.1 = "NVIDIA NV36M Pro "
NVIDIA_NV36.DEV_034B.1 = "NVIDIA NV36MAP "
NVIDIA_NV36.DEV_034C.1 = "NVIDIA Quadro FX Go 1000 "
NVIDIA_NV41.DEV_00C8.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800"
NVIDIA_NV41.DEV_00C9.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra"
NVIDIA_NV41.DEV_00CC.1 = "NVIDIA Quadro FX Go 1400 "
NVIDIA_NV43.DEV_0144.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce Go 6600"
NVIDIA_NV43.DEV_0146.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce Go 6600 TE/6200 TE"
NVIDIA_NV43.DEV_0148.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce Go 6600 "
NVIDIA_NV43.DEV_0149.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce Go 6600 GT"
NVIDIA_NV44.DEV_0164.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce Go 6200"
NVIDIA_NV44.DEV_0166.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce Go 6400"
NVIDIA_NV44.DEV_0167.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce Go 6200 "
NVIDIA_NV44.DEV_0168.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce Go 6400 "
NVIDIA_NV44.DEV_016B.1 = "NVIDIA NV44GLM"
NVIDIA_NV44.DEV_016C.1 = "NVIDIA NV44GLM "
NVIDIA_NV44.DEV_016D.1 = "NVIDIA NV44GLM  "
NVIDIA_NV44.DEV_0228.1 = "NVIDIA NV44M"
MobileForce Driver Thread Layout v1.20
post #2 of 23
I'm downloading these. Hopefully it fixes my Antialiasing problems...

----------------------------------

UPDATE: So far so good, except for antialiasing -- which I am chalking up to Vista sucking. In XP (with my MUCH inferior Gen 2), I could turn on 4X MULTISAMPLING TRANSPARENCY Antialiasing in Guild Wars with about a 30% performance hit, but I still got between 40-70 fps on average. In Vista (with a MUCH more powerful system), I am usually getting between 60-120fps with NO Antialiasing, but the second I turn on 2x STANDARD (non-transparency) AA, I average between 25-50 fps (~50% worse). Then, going to 4x STANDARD (non-transparency) AA I am usually getting between 16-28 fps (yet another ~50% hit). It's like this in ALL my games, and has been this way with EVERY driver I have tried -- a 50% or so decrease in framerate for each level of AA applied. Is this a Vista problem, or what??? it sucks, because I HATE jaggies... I HATE VISTA!!! :::Pant pant pant:::

Besides that problem, these are averaging about 5-10 fps more in Guild Wars than my previous drivers (MF 163.75). This isn't timedemo or anything, but just running around with my mouse over the built-in FPS counter shows about that improvement. I'll take it. Image quality looks better to me with slightly brighter/more saturated colors than 163.75's, though with noticeably sharper textures. I didn't say BETTER textures, just sharper. There seems to be more depth to the color as well. I'm pretty sure this is how GW was SUPPOSED to look, and USED to with the XP drivers, but I just got used to the blandness of 163.75's so everything looks so good to me, LOL!

I'll try Team Fortress 2, Portal, CoD4 Demo, CoH, RS: Vegas, etcetera later. I'm pretty beat right now.

-------------------------------------

Update 2: The bright/vibrant colors are also in 2D! I love it! Were 163.75's THAT bad, or are these drivers just that good?

-------------------------------------

Update 3: OK, I went into EVERY game I had, and at first thought these drivers sucked, since there was hitching everywhere and slowdowns. Turns out my CPU was stuck at 999 MHz for some damn reason... I restarted and all was well, for the most part. I was getting artifacting on the CoD4 demo, so I backed off my overclock on my GPU, and it was good from there on out. Despite the lower GPU clock (I went down from 600/1400 to 587/1300), EVERY game was smooth as silk. CoH benchmarked at 44.4 ave/61.4 max/19.9 min, which is my best yet. WiC benched at 25 ave/46 max/12 min, which is just about the same as it was before if not slightly faster (I think I got 24/42/12 before). RS:Vegas was smoother than it has EVER been for me -- perfectly hitch and slow-down free. Amazing. TF2 ran noticeably better with less slowdowns on new texture loads. GRAW2 ran with less mouse lag (meaning faster) than before. In all, EVERYTHING ran just as well or FASTER than 163.75 and with less hitching.

But IMHO, if these drivers ran the SAME speed as 163.75's, I'd b happy because the IMAGE QUALITY was OUT OF THIS WORLD!!! In comparison to 163.75, everything was richer, deeper, more colorful, with the textures jumping off the page. Sharpness was great, too. Everything about these drivers have been amazing for me! These look to be my old XP 94.20/97.92 drivers -- excellent IQ, high framerates, AND smoothness.

HIGHLY RECOMMENDED!

------------------------------------

Update 4: I had never played Splinter Cell: Double Agent before, and my buddy dug it out for me (it's mine now, LOL). I was able to play that 1-year-old game a little bit at 1920x1200 with MAX settings and it is 100% smooth and stutter-free.
post #3 of 23
Now that I got a bit time,I tested these in UT3 Demo with 4x AF, and they ran great, no more struttering compared to previous drivers, nicely done GFT!!!
post #4 of 23
Thread Starter 
Excellent to hear Xenon!
post #5 of 23
When will be the 64 bit version available? the WHQL?
post #6 of 23
The file link for the new 169.04 M6 does not work-Do you have a working download link for it,please- Thank You-
post #7 of 23
Will these work on a Mac running bootcamp with windows with 8600gt?
post #8 of 23
This, by far, is the best driver that's running on my computer right now Tony! but, there is still the occasional lagging. Got 1,750 on 3dmark06 today. So, not too bad.
post #9 of 23
?
post #10 of 23
Thread Starter 
I don't see why not, if it's Windows Vista, it'll work. The PCI-ID's should be the same, regardless.
post #11 of 23
Thread Starter 
Also, the download link works fine...
post #12 of 23
Yes -Link for download works fine for me now-Thanks
post #13 of 23
Is there a link to these? I can't overclock with the 169.06's and want to...

Y2J
post #14 of 23
NBF MobileForce 169.04 M6 32bit Vista

http://rapidshare.com/files/71967112...ista_.exe.html
post #15 of 23

Looking for VS 169.04 M6 64-bit

Anyone know where I can d/l this?

TIA
post #16 of 23
Thread Starter 
There was no MobileForce 64-Bit version of this driver. You can get 169.09 64-Bit, however.
post #17 of 23
Thread Starter 
MediaFire links back up. Sorry for the delay in getting things re-sorted.
post #18 of 23
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeForceTony View Post
There was no MobileForce 64-Bit version of this driver. You can get 169.09 64-Bit, however.
But I've heard OCing isn't allowed with the 169.09 driver. Can I use the 169.04 driver for Vista 32bit on my laptop?
post #19 of 23
Thread Starter 
Not if you have Vista 64-Bit.
post #20 of 23
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeForceTony View Post
Not if you have Vista 64-Bit.
So whats my best bet if I wanted to OC my 7900GTX while running Vista 64-bit? TIA
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: NBF MobileForce Drivers