NotebookForums.com › Forums › Off Topic › Desktop and Hardware Discussion › AMD Drops Below $7 a Share
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

AMD Drops Below $7 a Share

post #1 of 10
Thread Starter 
Whether you're an investor or not, this is something you might want to follow.

Google Finance
post #2 of 10
when are their CPUs gonna launch?
post #3 of 10
Thread Starter 
Triple core in March. Upper 9xxx (Phenom 9900) later in 2008. Lots of delays due to TLB erattum.

There is a BIOS fix out for the early Phenom TLB issues, but it still leaves the chip deficient in many areas.
post #4 of 10
well its not the simple to invest. what is their book-to-bill ration? what is their backlog? what is their guidance regarding their 12 month outlook?

I would not touch this stock with a ten foot mouse
post #5 of 10
Thread Starter 
Nor would I. All major bank analysts downgraded to sell.
post #6 of 10
This is bad if they die who keeps Intel in check?
post #7 of 10
Thread Starter 
I don't think they'll die. There are a few private investors dropping some mega bone$ in AMD.

Something else people may want to keep at the back of their mind...AMD did make an announcement in November relating to the desire to focus more on the mainstream market and the Spider platform.

I think that statement was the unofficial 'passing of the performance torch' to Intel. Core technology really kicked 'em in the gut in 2007, but they still kept up a good fight. It's hard to place the blame on engineering - they most likely had an enormous amount executive pressure on their shoulders

/rant on
If it were me (and I am in the engineering business), I'd be on a witch hunt...and start with Ruiz and his cronies. They were most likely the reason for Phenom's performance failure. If the senior execs allowed engineering more time instead of spreading propaganda (you know, that stuff that both looks and sounds like $hit), we could be reading articles and reports 180-out from where they are now.

OTOH, they needed (and still need) to generate some cash flow. ATI's lackluster array of products in 2007 was dead weight. I'd imagine they bet the bank on the 512-bit 2900XT, only to lose that battle as well.

I'm still trying to find out what particular facet of ATI AMD couldn't resist. Was it the idea of a Mac-like platform? I doubt it. Maybe they had some 8x10 glossies of Hector. Who knows.
//rant off

viva Hector
post #8 of 10
Declining so rapidly too...almost 8% down in the day
post #9 of 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buck47 View Post
I'm still trying to find out what particular facet of ATI AMD couldn't resist. Was it the idea of a Mac-like platform? I doubt it. Maybe they had some 8x10 glossies of Hector. Who knows.

viva Hector
Computer on a chip. They're looking to have one chip package to run both general processing and graphics processing at core speeds.
38xx's aren't pigs but they're not performance kings either. Midrange should be where they spend their monies but they seem to be clueless at implementation.
If AMD tanked then Intel could milk the hell out of the Q9XXX's.
post #10 of 10
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by RockSteady View Post
Computer on a chip. They're looking to have one chip package to run both general processing and graphics processing at core speeds.
38xx's aren't pigs but they're not performance kings either. Midrange should be where they spend their monies but they seem to be clueless at implementation.
If AMD tanked then Intel could milk the hell out of the Q9XXX's.
I know that's the most likely reason. A great idea, but quite the gamble (a bit too risky) considering ATI's position just prior to purchase.

The 38xx's, IMHO, offer the best bang-for-the-Buck , especially in X-Fire. I hope the RV700s also make a good run.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Desktop and Hardware Discussion
NotebookForums.com › Forums › Off Topic › Desktop and Hardware Discussion › AMD Drops Below $7 a Share