New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

8800m GTX Sli benchmarks

post #1 of 37
1/30/08 at 12:34pm
Thread Starter 
Ok here are some basic benchmark scores for you.

System Config:
M1730: T7700@2.4 GHz, 2g ram, 200g HDD (x2), DVD-RW, Nv 8800M GTX SLI. Vista Ultimate

3dMark 06 (1920x1200) : 10163
http://service.futuremark.com/orb/re...0&UID=13780833


<img src="http://img444.imageshack.us/img444/6642/3dmarl19x12oc8.jpg" border="0" alt="Image Hosted by ImageShack.us"/>

Fraps Data: (all set max res/max settings)

2008-01-29 13:55:21 - UT3Demo
Frames: 2586 - Time: 48655ms - Avg: 53.149 - Min: 16 - Max: 62

2008-01-29 15:51:59 - FEARXP2-Demo
Frames: 54440 - Time: 430022ms - Avg: 126.598 - Min: 0 - Max: 263

2008-01-30 10:18:32 - TimeShift
Frames: 12550 - Time: 185388ms - Avg: 67.696 - Min: 41 - Max: 117

2008-01-30 10:33:33 - iw3sp
Frames: 31987 - Time: 440379ms - Avg: 72.635 - Min: 23 - Max: 195

Crysis UpDated: (F'n vista caused the setting not to save right) The following benchmarks where done using Crysis benchmark util I found over at guru3d.

2/13/2008 10:32:44 AM - Vista
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX10 1900x1200, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: VeryHigh
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 186.87s, Average FPS: 10.70
Min FPS: 4.27 at frame 90, Max FPS: 22.58 at frame 1189
Average Tri/Sec: -9011310, Tri/Frame: -841973
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.09
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 144.52s, Average FPS: 13.84
Min FPS: 4.27 at frame 90, Max FPS: 22.58 at frame 1189
Average Tri/Sec: -11535945, Tri/Frame: -833573
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.10
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 140.40s, Average FPS: 14.24
Min FPS: 4.27 at frame 90, Max FPS: 22.58 at frame 1189
Average Tri/Sec: -11881713, Tri/Frame: -834120
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.10
TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed)
==============================================================

Completed All Tests

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

2/13/2008 10:32:44 AM - Vista

Run #1- DX10 1900x1200 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 14.04



2/13/2008 10:44:34 AM - Vista
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX10 1900x1200, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: High
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 91.67s, Average FPS: 21.82
Min FPS: 8.95 at frame 128, Max FPS: 43.95 at frame 873
Average Tri/Sec: -22942676, Tri/Frame: -1051532
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -0.87
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 63.18s, Average FPS: 31.65
Min FPS: 8.95 at frame 128, Max FPS: 45.14 at frame 1737
Average Tri/Sec: -33276080, Tri/Frame: -1051256
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -0.87
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 52.21s, Average FPS: 38.31
Min FPS: 8.95 at frame 128, Max FPS: 45.14 at frame 1737
Average Tri/Sec: -40343180, Tri/Frame: -1053185
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -0.87
TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed)
==============================================================

Completed All Tests

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

2/13/2008 10:44:34 AM - Vista

Run #1- DX10 1900x1200 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 34.98



2/13/2008 11:00:09 AM - Vista
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX10 1900x1200, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: Medium
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 65.43s, Average FPS: 30.57
Min FPS: 30.28 at frame 166, Max FPS: 67.54 at frame 1644
Average Tri/Sec: 20133720, Tri/Frame: 658699
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.39
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 44.87s, Average FPS: 44.57
Min FPS: 30.28 at frame 166, Max FPS: 70.37 at frame 80
Average Tri/Sec: 29669262, Tri/Frame: 665616
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.38
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 46.01s, Average FPS: 43.47
Min FPS: 30.28 at frame 166, Max FPS: 70.37 at frame 80
Average Tri/Sec: 28919340, Tri/Frame: 665308
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.38
TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed)
==============================================================

Completed All Tests

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

2/13/2008 11:00:09 AM - Vista

Run #1- DX10 1900x1200 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: Medium ~~ Overall Average FPS: 44.02

I will update this with more scores when I get a chance.

Enjoy!
Zyb
Reply
Reply
post #2 of 37
1/30/08 at 12:38pm
Nice, bench some more taxing 3D apps. And be sure to post in the fraps benchmark thread created by TurbodTalon
Reply
Reply
post #3 of 37
1/30/08 at 12:47pm
I'm still wondering how people can afford another $700 on top of that whew?
Let's see some Crysis !!!
3D mark Next will be the challenge though. It supports Shader Model 4.
Reply
Reply
post #4 of 37
1/30/08 at 1:05pm
if people were willing to spend 3-5k on a laptop, I'm pretty sure they are willing to spend another 1k to upgrade the GPU!

I'm considering for the upgrade, but really don't see the need for it now.
Reply
Reply
post #5 of 37
1/30/08 at 1:21pm
I could see someone buying it later, but with the system. You even know how good it is. There going to have to make a LCD better than a WUXGA with that monster!
Reply
Reply
post #6 of 37
1/30/08 at 1:25pm
man you got over 10000 at 1920x1200. thats sick. I cant wait till mine get here. w00t.
Reply
Reply
post #7 of 37
1/30/08 at 1:47pm
Considering my Desktop Sli 8800GT setup 3dMark06 score was in the 13K range, and that both cards set me back $ 600.00 shipped, it's not that bad of a deal for the GPU upgrade price.
Reply
Reply
post #8 of 37
1/30/08 at 1:52pm
I want to see some benchs in crysis at ultra high settings, or high settings
Reply
Reply
post #9 of 37
1/30/08 at 2:02pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cas View Post
I want to see some benchs in crysis at ultra high settings, or high settings
...both actually
Reply
Reply
post #10 of 37
1/30/08 at 5:56pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by nonya24 View Post
I'm still wondering how people can afford another $700 on top of that whew?
Business Expense
Reply
Reply
post #11 of 37
1/30/08 at 6:17pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by zyb View Post
Fraps Data: (all set max res/max settings)

2008-01-29 13:55:21 - UT3Demo
Frames: 2586 - Time: 48655ms - Avg: 53.149 - Min: 16 - Max: 62

2008-01-29 15:51:59 - FEARXP2-Demo
Frames: 54440 - Time: 430022ms - Avg: 126.598 - Min: 0 - Max: 263

2008-01-30 10:18:32 - TimeShift
Frames: 12550 - Time: 185388ms - Avg: 67.696 - Min: 41 - Max: 117

2008-01-30 10:33:33 - iw3sp
Frames: 31987 - Time: 440379ms - Avg: 72.635 - Min: 23 - Max: 195

2008-01-30 10:50:31 - Crysis
Frames: 19621 - Time: 564772ms - Avg: 34.741 - Min: 10 - Max: 88


I will update this with more scores when I get a chance.

Enjoy!
Zyb
You mean to tell me that you got 35fps on Crysis with 1920x1200 @ fully maxed settings? It seems unbelievable
Reply
Reply
post #12 of 37
1/30/08 at 7:04pm
I'm also stunned 10K in 3D06 @ 1900x1200 - that is amassing, this XPS model is quick dam quick. I have already brought a 230W PSU just praying for the day when SHMBO is not looking to hard at the credit card receipts he he he
Reply
Reply
post #13 of 37
1/30/08 at 7:19pm
I'm sure the 10K 3d06 was at default settings (1280x1024)
Reply
Reply
post #14 of 37
1/30/08 at 7:28pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by atwood7fan View Post
I'm sure the 10K 3d06 was at default settings (1280x1024)
Your right but if you check the settings used to run that test you will see it's been run at 1920x1200 - so one would expect higher 3D mark 06 scores at the default res, reading on the dell direct site they clam 13K in 3D06, they don't specify the res so based on the above test I'm assuming it is at the default res of 1280x1024 which is really sick!!!


I WANT ONE!!!!!!!!
Reply
Reply
post #15 of 37
1/30/08 at 7:30pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdonket View Post
You mean to tell me that you got 35fps on Crysis with 1920x1200 @ fully maxed settings? It seems unbelievable
That's too good to be true. Not even the best SLI desktop setups can claim that.
Reply
Reply
post #16 of 37
1/30/08 at 7:48pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by wraithrsw View Post
That's too good to be true. Not even the best SLI desktop setups can claim that.
Exactly what I'm thinking
Reply
Reply
post #17 of 37
1/30/08 at 7:53pm
maybe he ment 1920x1200 at high, not at ultra high... Im thinking that if the 8700sli can give around 10fps this would easily give 30....
Reply
Reply
post #18 of 37
1/30/08 at 9:12pm
Hmm has dell already released their GPU´s? They announced it just a few days ago, didn´t think people got the cards already
Reply
Reply
post #19 of 37
1/30/08 at 11:09pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by pettersson72 View Post
Hmm has dell already released their GPU´s? They announced it just a few days ago, didn´t think people got the cards already
I beleive zyb is somehow affiliated with Dell or has very good sources since he is located in Texas

all i can say is 10k 3dmarks at 1920x1200
dear mother of god that is SICK
even 13k at default 3Dmark settings is fantastic, I had to overclock the hell out of my desktop system to clock over 15k. I rolled back my overclock due to power problems and have a hard time breaking 14k so I am truely imressed with the 1730's 8800 gtx sli
all I want to see now is Alienware's m17x's version and make my decision on my next lappy hehe
Reply
Reply
post #20 of 37
1/31/08 at 1:57am
Crysis is not is good as I though.
Lemmie see some "VERY HIGH".
And why does Sli not give you a 2X boost there 2X the GPU's?
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home