NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Dell Forums › Dell Home (Inspiron, XPS, Studio) › Giving up on Dell after a 15 year run
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Giving up on Dell after a 15 year run - Page 2

post #21 of 34
Its amazing how photographers and graphic designers made due with VGA for 10+ years, yet today's crop of so-called-experts can't seem to figure it out. . .
post #22 of 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rube View Post
Its amazing how photographers and graphic designers made due with VGA for 10+ years, yet today's crop of so-called-experts can't seem to figure it out. . .
seriously? might want to think of the advances in technology before making a blanket statement like that
post #23 of 34
Thread Starter 
Damn Rube, another zinger that fell flat at my feet

Professional photographers are 110% OCD about color, luminance and sharpness on their displays. Getting natural skin tones is tough. Making sure that the brightness and color of what you see on the screen is the same as whats on the print takes skill and the right equipment.

Even with proper calibration there is no way you can trust what you see on a Dell laptop's screen for final editing. All of them are 6 bit panels, and you have to have an 8 bit LCD to edit. Further than that you have to have an the right type of LCD panel. The 2407 with its Samsung PVA panel has great grey transitions, but it is a little bright overall. If you calibrate it once evey couple of months you are good to go.

One thing you also have to remember is that pro photographers have really only had decent digital SLR bodies since Canon came out with the D30 (not 30D) in 2000. Back then people went for 17 - 21" CRT monitors that they had to calibrate every week because of tube drift. My guess is that most people running VGA were doing so at less than 1600x1200. Running VGA on a 1920x1200 LCD will work and gets you around the speedy drift of CRTs, but you still have to deal with drifts from converting from Digital to analog VGA, then back to Digital. You also have to deal with NOT having 1 to 1 pixel representation on VGA. That lack of 1 to 1 is one of the reasons VGA is less sharp.

I know that a lot of graphic designers with high end monitors back in the 90's would use BNC connectors because they could not live with VGA 10 years ago. Sorry to shoot down your 10 years of living with VGA statement. Go read a book.
post #24 of 34
Bokeh is right - I'm in the print game - we make printing inks for the printing industry most of the graphic designers are seriously anal about skin tones and will spend hours stuffing around with a print run if they are not happy - which is why you never want these guys to do a press pass!!!!

On a side not - they seem to have a lack of ideas when it comes to dot gain but then hey they work on displays (sorry Bokeh couldn't resist the stab)

On a side note while I have not had any problems with my graphics cards in the 9400, I believe this is only due to running Ik8fangui and ensuring I don't idle over 52deg C during the day - I use my lappy 100% for work so it runs all day every day and while now I run a 7950GTX that's not because the 7900go failed just because I wanted the extra performance for some gaming whin I have time.
post #25 of 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrEvil View Post
Darcy, I do agree wtih you that an M6300 Precision should be what you should get. However, you CAN convert VGA to Component and Component supports 1080p. If the display supports RGB and not YPbPr you can use a simple $20 adapter.

Also, unless your clientele also includes photography professionals, I doubt they'd even notice the difference anyway, as most of the population wouldn't know at a glance.
correct that is possible (quality is a step down.. if you know what to look for), and I suppose could it work in an emergency or if I'm offsite; but my newly renovated workspace is prewired via hdmi to the monitors/displays, and I not going to mess with that (the hdmi/dvi solution is great) and to go back to analogue signals and wiring .. step back-wards.
post #26 of 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bokeh View Post
Damn Rube, another zinger that fell flat at my feet
ZING! LOL

Being an amateur photographer myself, I wish I knew how to properly calibrate an LCD. I use my i9300 for the pictures I take with my Rebel XT (I know it's nothing fancy.) but being able to calibrate my LCD for use with it would be SOO nice, if only I knew how.


In for a tutorial.
post #27 of 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bokeh View Post
I know that a lot of graphic designers with high end monitors back in the 90's would use BNC connectors because they could not live with VGA 10 years ago. Sorry to shoot down your 10 years of living with VGA statement. Go read a book.
The fact that high end professional monitors existed doesn't mean that everyone had access to them or the means to purchase them. I'm not saying either that a single person was forced to use VGA for 10 years straight, just that for many new to the industry or low on funds made due with VGA. Even then, every graphic designer I've worked with (admittedly, only a few) has always calibrated their monitor on a regular basis, whether they be DVI, VGA or BNC connected.

Either way, I apologize for my rabid snarkiness in this thread.
post #28 of 34
Thread Starter 
Thanks Rube. I was actually logging in this morning to apologize for you. I am known to almost always be level headed and support all of my arguments and views with facts. But yesterday was a long day and I threw a few jabs back at you. Its all misdirected frustration with Dell support and unfortunately it came your way.

The other thing is that I have lurked here for years, but as a new poster you have no idea if I know what the hell I am talking about. I think its ok to vet the knowledge of new people. I just have to get used to all of the the personalities here. Even though I am probably going the Apple way with my home computer I will still be working with Precision series notebooks at work and will continue to post.
post #29 of 34
Thread Starter 
One other thing that I forgot...

The new LED backlit LCD displays are the first LCD panels to show you more colors than you can see. The Dell 2407 is around 96% (could be 94%) of the colors you can see and the best of the new LCD panels is around 103%. As far as I know, Dell is not offering any LED backlit displays on notebooks. Apple is.

Skillz - remember that all of the 17" lcds are 6 bit panels. This means that even though your 8 bit pictures have 256 shades of R,G, and B that your panel will not be able to display all of them. It just means that where you have gradients of color or shades of grey that there could be some stair-stepping.

Color calibrators like the Colorvision Spyder Elite 3 that I use help you get an even color tones and an even mix of tones. Even really inexpensive color calibrators are better than your eyes.
post #30 of 34
If only I had any idea about photography and all the necessities.


Regardless, Dell should be providing you with a precision line system or M1730, however they won't

I think your only hope is to take a replacement and resell it, then put a little money in on top of that a buy a system fit for yourself.
post #31 of 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bokeh View Post
. As far as I know, Dell is not offering any LCD backlit displays on notebooks. Apple is.
Not quite, dell currently offers the LED LCD displays on a few xps lines that I know of, the 1330 and 1530 for sure. I also know the new latitude E-series will make use of LED LCD's
post #32 of 34
Thread Starter 
Good catch! I am surprised that they don't promote this more.
post #33 of 34
These are really good LCD threads, for the image part of this discussion.

http://www.hardforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=78

http://forums.anandtech.com/messagev...VIEWTMP=Linear

The critique is quite hard core, I'm not that sophisticated - looking at a pair of 24" this summer, and prob stick with Dell Ultrasharp

Wish the colour spider was cheaper, would be nice
post #34 of 34
Thread Starter 
I thought there was a $99 calibrator out there. Here is a good intro to color calibration - http://www.drycreekphoto.com/Learn/m...tion_tools.htm

IF I can find that cheap alternative I will send it to you.

I would also be happy to send my calibrated monitor profile from the M90 or M6300 to anyone that wants it. I can also send the one from my 1705. Since they sent the 1440x900 screen on the 1720 I can profile that one and then profile the 1920x1200 screen when it gets here Wednesday.

I know this is so far off topic, but that 1440x900 true life screen is terrible. TONS of light leakage from the bottom of the screen in a semi-circle extending halfway up the display. Off axis brightness shift is worse than my still running Inspiron 8100 even though its better than the old screen in every other way.


One more random thing.... I had to argue with tech support for 30 minutes to even get another 1920x1200 panel. They said my old one was true life, and my replacement was true life. We then played the alphabet game and the letter of the day was "U" - as in WUXGA. But, whoever talks to that tech next will get someone that understands the LCD options that were and are available. Was never able to convince the supervisor that video cards had DDR (much less DDR2 vs 3) ram though...
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Dell Forums › Dell Home (Inspiron, XPS, Studio) › Giving up on Dell after a 15 year run