NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Alienware Notebook Forums › Alienware Area-51 and Aurora Notebooks › nVidia 8700/8800/9600/9800 chips are failing across the board
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

nVidia 8700/8800/9600/9800 chips are failing across the board - Page 4

post #61 of 92
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoloMan View Post
He is, and so have the others, but nothing has been stated by you or the INQ (which you posted all over) has changed anything. Perpetuating rumors does not contribute to the community, facts and constructive solutions do.

Fact: Nvidia has owed up to their problem just as Sony is doing with theirs.

Fact: The issue has not been swept under the rug. So dont state that it has.
HP Joins Dell in Listing Notebook Models with Defective [nVidia] GPUs by Paul Lilly, Editor for HardwareLogic.com

Just over a week ago Dell made available a list of its notebooks that are affected by the GPUs believed to be suffering higher than expected failure rates [due to the card's failure to withstand the extreme thermal environments], and is recommending owners update their BIOS to reduce their risk of running into a problem. The updated BIOSes modify the fan profile to help regulate GPU temperature fluctuations, but as Dell notes, the new parameters won't help customers who are already suffering video-related issues.
Dell isn't alone, and now HP has also released a list of models that qualify for 'Warranty Service Enhancement' (curiously absent is the DV97xx series). And like Dell, HP is also recommending its owners update their BIOS as a preventive measure.
So are all G84 and G86 parts bad like The Inq surmised early in July? No one but Nvidia knows for sure, but looking over the list of affected models would seem to indicate the allegation could hold some merit.
Did Nvidia drop the ball harder than they're letting on? [Only nVidia knows for sure and they are not talking...]



Nvidia Reports Thermal Issues Caused Packaging Failures
Nvidia Corp. said some of its notebook-use graphics chips have failed because of packaging materials that could not withstand the �extreme thermal environments� seen in notebook computers. The company will take a one-time charge of $150M-$200M during its second quarter.
Staff -- Semiconductor International

Nvidia Corp. (Santa Clara, Calif.) said a thermal problem with packaging materials resulted in abnormally high rates of failure in the field for some of its notebook graphics chips, resulting in a one-time charge of $150M-$200M during its second quarter.
The company said it has “switched to a more robust die/package material set,” and is working with its customers to develop system management software that will provide better thermal management.
In a statement, CEO Jen-Hsun Huang said, “Although the failure appears related to the combination of the interaction between the chip material set and system design, we have a responsibility to our customers and will take our part in resolving this problem.”
Huang said Nvidia will work more closely with notebook system designers and its chip foundries to improve the robustness of the products. Discussions are underway with its supply chain regarding the material set issue. Also, Nvidia will seek to recover some of its loss from insurance.
“Today's high-performance notebooks are highly complex systems with extreme thermal environments. The combination of limited thermal management and frequent power cycling is particularly challenging for complex processors like the GPU,” Huang said.

I guess we will only know how bad it really is when notebook OEM's start suing nVidia over losses substained as a result of the defective cards currently on the market.
post #62 of 92
[quote=rive0108;2953017]
Quote:
Originally Posted by littlefrankus View Post


Read this...we are told all G92 and G94 variants are susceptible [to the same problem as the G84, and G86] ...
I did not say ALL nvidia chips are bad. Just the G8/G9 series [have the weak die issue] This is a defect that can and is resulting in failure, but it is not a foregone conclusion that all G84, G86, G92, G94 cards will fail. Preventing overheating is the crux, but just because a defective card hasn't failed yet doesn't mean it wont suffer failure in 1, or even 2 years from now as a result of the defect. (Futhermore, Geforce 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 series gpu's obviously are not suffering from the weak die hence Not all nVidia chips are bad)
You have jumped into numerous strings in this section to announce that any problems that come up are due to defective nVidia cards.

There is a known issue that causes a "greater than normal" failure rate with some models, that does not mean all nVidia cards are defective.

I have yet to see anyone on this forum that has had an issue with any of the cards you mention, yet you're here bleeting yet again that all nVidia cards are defective, now with the disclaimer that if it hasn't failed yet, it "might" in the future.

We used to have chicken littles like yourself spamming the forums bashing AW as selling defective products due to their particular issues, this is the same thing.

While bringing news items to the forums is a good thing, telling everyone in every string you can that their problems are conclusively due to nVidia cards being defective is stupid, and misleading.
post #63 of 92
Quote:
Originally Posted by rive0108 View Post
They are bad in the sense that they too have a defective die... (defective product = bad product) -Marketing 101
Outright lie.
post #64 of 92
Quote:
Originally Posted by rive0108 View Post
1 post is not every post... and the early 8700m cards do have a defective die, and he was reporting his card would overheat after 5 min., and just stop working while playing WOW (using stock Alienware drivers)- not downclock, but his whole display ceased to function forcing a cold reboot. I play WOW occasionally with an x1900, and do not have that problem, and his card is slightly more powerful than mine.
Let's let someone else base a conclusion on that...
Lots of people with all kinds of hardware are having issues with WoW. SLI users especially. Are you now going to say all SLI chipsets made by nVidia are defective, and if yours hasn't failed yet, it will?

You have posted this bullshit in post after post where people are having issues and seeking help. Your fear mongering and trying to convince anyone with an unidentified issue that they have defective hardware is nonsense.

Quote:
BTW I thought community Reps were supposed to be more helpful, and not so rude... I also thought this was an open forum where everyone was free discuss ideas, issues, etc. To flame someone because they have a difference of opinion, or bring to the surface controversial issues that you would rather see swept under the rug just seems wrong.
I'm very helpful, I'm trying to offset your bullshit with some sanity. You're in here bashing AW and nVidia, and causing panic with users by dishing them up your ridiculous conclusion that anyone that has an issue has inherent faulty hardware.

I'm rude to assholes, so it's not surprising you think I'm rude.
post #65 of 92
Quote:
Originally Posted by rive0108 View Post
HP Joins Dell in Listing Notebook Models with Defective [nVidia] GPUs by Paul Lilly, Editor for HardwareLogic.com

Just over a week ago Dell made available a list of its notebooks that are affected by the GPUs believed to be suffering higher than expected failure rates [due to the card's failure to withstand the extreme thermal environments], and is recommending owners update their BIOS to reduce their risk of running into a problem. The updated BIOSes modify the fan profile to help regulate GPU temperature fluctuations, but as Dell notes, the new parameters won't help customers who are already suffering video-related issues.
Dell isn't alone, and now HP has also released a list of models that qualify for 'Warranty Service Enhancement' (curiously absent is the DV97xx series). And like Dell, HP is also recommending its owners update their BIOS as a preventive measure.
So are all G84 and G86 parts bad like The Inq surmised early in July? No one but Nvidia knows for sure, but looking over the list of affected models would seem to indicate the allegation could hold some merit.
Did Nvidia drop the ball harder than they're letting on? [Only nVidia knows for sure and they are not talking...]



Nvidia Reports Thermal Issues Caused Packaging Failures
Nvidia Corp. said some of its notebook-use graphics chips have failed because of packaging materials that could not withstand the �extreme thermal environments� seen in notebook computers. The company will take a one-time charge of $150M-$200M during its second quarter.
Staff -- Semiconductor International

Nvidia Corp. (Santa Clara, Calif.) said a thermal problem with packaging materials resulted in abnormally high rates of failure in the field for some of its notebook graphics chips, resulting in a one-time charge of $150M-$200M during its second quarter.
The company said it has “switched to a more robust die/package material set,” and is working with its customers to develop system management software that will provide better thermal management.
In a statement, CEO Jen-Hsun Huang said, “Although the failure appears related to the combination of the interaction between the chip material set and system design, we have a responsibility to our customers and will take our part in resolving this problem.”
Huang said Nvidia will work more closely with notebook system designers and its chip foundries to improve the robustness of the products. Discussions are underway with its supply chain regarding the material set issue. Also, Nvidia will seek to recover some of its loss from insurance.
“Today's high-performance notebooks are highly complex systems with extreme thermal environments. The combination of limited thermal management and frequent power cycling is particularly challenging for complex processors like the GPU,” Huang said.

I guess we will only know how bad it really is when notebook OEM's start suing nVidia over losses substained as a result of the defective cards currently on the market.
How can defective hardware be "repaired" by a different fan profile in the bios?

Nobody is going to sue nVidia, as the problem has been identified, and is being addressed.

Your posts are ridiculously over the top.
post #66 of 92
More bad news for NV, class action filed for illegal SEC practices.......

Damn another one of the pro NV legs just got chopped out from under it.
post #67 of 92
Ah did someone say Ambulance Chasing? So some lawyer saw a get rich quick deal here. People will be lucky if any to get maybe a few bucks out of it.

Seriously doubt it will ever be heard by a judge, or even settled out of court.

Most of the Manufacturers (HP and Dell) are covered and have extended their warrenties accordingly, to which Nvidia would pick up the tab for any gpu returned. So no one there will be in line.

As far as SEC they would have to investigate as to whether or not pricing of the stock was manipulated. As of 9/10/08 there has not been any such charges.

Right now Nvidia is solid on two legs with no crutch is in sight.
post #68 of 92
Thread Starter 
Nvidia offers $200 refund to OEMs with defective GPUs

By Justin Mann, TechSpot.com
Published: September 8, 2008, 11:51 AM EST

Nvidia is still bleeding money due to the defective GPU issue, which has been problematic for them amongst multiple cards. Initially thought only to affect certain cards in the G84 and G85 series, it was later to be found more widespread. Matters were made even worse when many mobile GPUs were found to be outright defective and needed to be replaced.

This didn't make vendors happy, so Nvidia has been forced to deal with issuing refunds to them to cover their losses. Nvidia is being generous with the refund, issuing $200 per laptop, enough to cover the cost of replacing the defective part and getting it to/from the customer.

Note- HH it is outrageous that you would try to convince people that nVidia is not releasing defective GPU's when the evidence clearly indicates otherwise. Emphatically stating it is all over
the top, and untrue lies will not make it so. People need to know what's really happening- even If It does discourage...


ALSO...
"...Right now Nvidia is solid on two legs with no crutch in sight"
-Soloman

As a result of manufacturing defects and the inevitable fallout from it, it seems that Nvidia has gone from enjoying a few beautiful years on top to actually losing money recently. In particular, Nvidia saw a decrease in revenue for the second quarter of this year, resulting in a financial loss for the company. In total, they lost over $120 million.
post #69 of 92
Thread Starter 

Nvidia violated U.S. securities laws

[quote=archalien;2954369]More bad news for NV, class action filed for illegal SEC practices.......

Brower Piven Encourages Investors Who Have Losses in Excess of $200,000 From Investment in NVIDIA Corp. to Inquire About the Lead Plaintiff Position in Securities Fraud Class Action Lawsuit Before the November 10, 2008 Lead Plaintiff Deadline

BALTIMORE, MD--(MARKET WIRE)--Sep 10, 2008 -- Brower Piven, A Professional Corporation announces that a class action lawsuit has been commenced in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on behalf of purchasers of the common stock of NVIDIA Corporation ("NVIDIA" or the "Company") (NasdaqGS:NVDA - News) during the period between November 8, 2007 and July 2, 2008, inclusive (the "Class Period").
No class has yet been certified in the above action.

The complaint alleges that the defendants violated the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by issuing a series of misrepresentations and omissions that concealed and failed to disclose the unusually high failure rates of NVIDIA's mobile video adapters and the impact of these defects on the Company's financial condition and results for future business prospects.
post #70 of 92
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hammerhead View Post
Lots of people with all kinds of hardware are having issues with WoW. SLI users especially. Are you now going to say all SLI chipsets made by nVidia are defective, and if yours hasn't failed yet, it will?

You have posted this bullshit in post after post where people are having issues and seeking help. Your fear mongering and trying to convince anyone with an unidentified issue that they have defective hardware is nonsense.



I'm very helpful, I'm trying to offset your bullshit with some sanity. You're in here bashing AW and nVidia, and causing panic with users by dishing them up your ridiculous conclusion that anyone that has an issue has inherent faulty hardware.

I'm rude to assholes, so it's not surprising you think I'm rude.
Hammer-
Well I have to disagree with you there. Information and knowledge is not fear-mongering, But to only show one side of an issue, and repress or conceal info that may not be so favorable to one's own point of view is called Censorship.

BTW, resorting to vulgarities (especially as a Comunity rep-shame on you! ) In a tech forum does not speak highly of your alledged knowledge or skills as it is an earmark of a small weak-minded person who isnt getting their way, and thinks an attempt at intimidation might solve their problem that discourse could not. Perhaps you could spend your online time "helping" someone else in a different thread? If it isn't too difficult for you, perhaps you could also keep the Flaming temper trantrums to a minimum. Thanks.
post #71 of 92
Quote:
Originally Posted by rive0108 View Post
[i][b]
...Ouch. Nice Post. Thanks...California is a wise choice for such a lawsuit- Might even go class action for consumers. (If it doesn't get class action status that is).
The source of this report had stated it is.
post #72 of 92
Solo and Hammer and anyone else who is in utter denial.....

Its one thing when you attacked initial information as being from unreputable source(theInquirer), but damn, its all over the net, its been officially dealt with by the major vendors, nv stock has tanked accordingly, nv has released presser after presser claiming more responsibility each time.

Now this lawsuit is an "Ambulance Chaser". While "this actual" lawsuit may very well indeed be an ambulance chase, that fact that its even available shows just how much NV fumbled with investors claiming SEC Fraud.


There is a proverb: “If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, looks like a duck, it must be a duck”.

NV is PR spinning, making charge backs, and being sued like they f'd up, they must be a Duck!

For anyone to walk around denying the situation, quacks on these boards like its doesnt exist, and not be able to produce a single link to the contrary.... well your a Duck too then.

And by Duck I mean Rocket Launcher toting, beer gut bustin, 3 teeth havin- through and through NV FanBoy errrr Moron and your doing these boards and this community a disservice by propagating this pro NV FUD!
post #73 of 92
I am not in denial this is the only place consumers are saying anything. Why dont you bring it up on the Dell board and HP and Apple and see what happens? I have been to all of them and not a thing why is that?
post #74 of 92
Thread Starter 
Such controversy here...Can't we all just get along?
post #75 of 92
let's keep things civil in here, people
post #76 of 92
Quote:
Originally Posted by rive0108 View Post
Hammer-
Well I have to disagree with you there. Information and knowledge is not fear-mongering, But to only show one side of an issue, and repress or conceal info that may not be so favorable to one's own point of view is called Censorship.

BTW, resorting to vulgarities (especially as a Comunity rep-shame on you! ) In a tech forum does not speak highly of your alledged knowledge or skills as it is an earmark of a small weak-minded person who isnt getting their way, and thinks an attempt at intimidation might solve their problem that discourse could not. Perhaps you could spend your online time "helping" someone else in a different thread? If it isn't too difficult for you, perhaps you could also keep the Flaming temper trantrums to a minimum. Thanks.
Hey Rive - I've got nothing against you. Keep trolling/flamebaiting like this, you'll find yourself posting on other forums.....rather quickly.

Quote:
Originally Posted by archalien View Post
Solo and Hammer and anyone else who is in utter denial.....

Its one thing when you attacked initial information as being from unreputable source(theInquirer), but damn, its all over the net, its been officially dealt with by the major vendors, nv stock has tanked accordingly, nv has released presser after presser claiming more responsibility each time.

Now this lawsuit is an "Ambulance Chaser". While "this actual" lawsuit may very well indeed be an ambulance chase, that fact that its even available shows just how much NV fumbled with investors claiming SEC Fraud.


There is a proverb: “If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, looks like a duck, it must be a duck”.

NV is PR spinning, making charge backs, and being sued like they f'd up, they must be a Duck!

For anyone to walk around denying the situation, quacks on these boards like its doesnt exist, and not be able to produce a single link to the contrary.... well your a Duck too then.

And by Duck I mean Rocket Launcher toting, beer gut bustin, 3 teeth havin- through and through NV FanBoy errrr Moron and your doing these boards and this community a disservice by propagating this pro NV FUD!
Are they really in utter denial?
post #77 of 92
Im not denying that there is a higher than normal failure rate but I dont believe that all the cards are bad all my friends with there 8800 cards and mine have been through the paces with crysis for hours on end and still no issues... not all the m7700 laptops are bad... there are some people who have never had an issue with there m7700...
post #78 of 92
defective != guaranteed failure..... (coder for does not equal)

Anything north of industry accepted failure rates is considered defective.
That doesnt mean they ALL fail, with an industry standard of say 3% defective as acceptable (for example), a 7% defective rate gets the product classified as defective. If the defect say is in a toaster or a car and has the potential to set fire and cause death, a recall is issued ON THE ENTIRE LINE even if empirical evidence corroborates at most 10% failure and 90% wont fail, there is no way to tell which ones will be in the 10%, hence the ENTIRE LINE is considered defective and recalled. Just because the NV defect doesnt amount to being life threatening doesnt mean it doesnt follow the same rules. If this defect had the potential to set a laptop ablaze and potentially cause a life taking fire, you better believe there would be a MUCH more accurate account of exactly which units are defective and susceptible to the higher than normal failure and those ENTIRE LINES would be publicly recalled. (ala the original Xbox power cord)

Hammer must be in good with the gaming godz as he has 4? apparently affected NV products he's stresses without failure, someone without good gaming Karma might have been the unfortunate one who pulled the failing product off the shelf minutes before Hammer made each of his purchases....
post #79 of 92
Quote:
Originally Posted by archalien View Post
defective != guaranteed failure..... (coder for does not equal)

Anything north of industry accepted failure rates is considered defective.
That doesnt mean they ALL fail, with an industry standard of say 3% defective as acceptable (for example), a 7% defective rate gets the product classified as defective. If the defect say is in a toaster or a car and has the potential to set fire and cause death, a recall is issued ON THE ENTIRE LINE even if empirical evidence corroborates at most 10% failure and 90% wont fail, there is no way to tell which ones will be in the 10%, hence the ENTIRE LINE is considered defective and recalled. Just because the NV defect doesnt amount to being life threatening doesnt mean it doesnt follow the same rules. If this defect had the potential to set a laptop ablaze and potentially cause a life taking fire, you better believe there would be a MUCH more accurate account of exactly which units are defective and susceptible to the higher than normal failure and those ENTIRE LINES would be publicly recalled. (ala the original Xbox power cord)

This is what we have been trying to say that not all the chips will fail....
post #80 of 92
Quote:
Originally Posted by littlefrankus View Post
This is what we have been trying to say that not all the chips will fail....
But they are still considered to be from a defective product line
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Alienware Notebook Forums › Alienware Area-51 and Aurora Notebooks › nVidia 8700/8800/9600/9800 chips are failing across the board