I'm wondering if anyone with a larger Sager has tested the speed of RAID0 and compared it to a non raid configuration with the same drives.
I'm interested in how it affected battery life and boot times also. One of the main drawbacks of RAID in my opinion is that there is a significant time requirement during boot or recovery from hibernation as the RAID configures in BIOS compared to using IDE mode on your SATA drives. That requirement would easily negate any speed advantages during boot. The other main advantages of RAID0 in a gaming notebook is the load times of game levels but I'm not sure how much of a difference it would make.
The disadvantage of RAID0 is that both drives must run together at all times which will significantly affect battery life. In a non raid environment you can actually disable your second drive temporarily if you don't need it to improve battery life although it should stay spooled down anyway.
I'm interested in how it affected battery life and boot times also. One of the main drawbacks of RAID in my opinion is that there is a significant time requirement during boot or recovery from hibernation as the RAID configures in BIOS compared to using IDE mode on your SATA drives. That requirement would easily negate any speed advantages during boot. The other main advantages of RAID0 in a gaming notebook is the load times of game levels but I'm not sure how much of a difference it would make.
The disadvantage of RAID0 is that both drives must run together at all times which will significantly affect battery life. In a non raid environment you can actually disable your second drive temporarily if you don't need it to improve battery life although it should stay spooled down anyway.





