NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › HP, Compaq and Voodoo Forums › HP, Compaq and Voodoo Notebook Benchmarks › HP dv7-2040US - Windows Performance Index 5.6
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

HP dv7-2040US - Windows Performance Index 5.6 - Page 5

post #81 of 101
hey nickwelder do you mind running 3dmark benchmarks for me so i can compare my scores. I got 6832 in 3dmark 06 but that seems a little low for the processor and graphics card (at least compared to this one website where they had lower CPU scores then me but same graphics cards and a higher 3dmark 06 score.)

i dont think vantage will give me a score because of the lack of 1280x1024 resolution lol.
post #82 of 101
Thread Starter 
3dmark06 won't run on my computer because I don't have the right resolution (F'in STUPID!! How about a standard resolution like, I dunno....um 1024x768!!!!!!!!)
post #83 of 101
Thread Starter 
I got 7182 on 3DMark06. Pretty bad but I have an idea why it was that low so I am gonna test again. I had some tests unchecked.
post #84 of 101
Thread Starter 
Ok I got an 8970 now on 3DMark06. Still low. I'll try again tomorrow with a fresh restart.
post #85 of 101
Would you share the steps as how you can squeeze more out the benchmark? Settings? Tips?

That was a good jump from one day to another.

cheers ...
post #86 of 101
approved
post #87 of 101
Thread Starter 
A combination of things. 3DMark06 specifically, I made sure ALL tests were checked and it calculated those tests in.to the final score. On other benchmarks I mess with CCC settings, boot in selective starup mode (safe mode + certain drivers like GFX). Turn off all visual effects. Force quit ALL unecessary process. Drop CPU and GPU core temperatures to 85F or lower and then maintaining load temperatures of <105F by removing battery and all covers. I start by letting the computer sleep and cool and blowing fan/AC over the motherboard with the bottom facing up during tests.

I make sure I'm locked into a 7.5x - 8.5x CPU multiplier by overriding Intel SpeedStep.

I overclocked the GPU to 700MHz and GfxMem to 800MHz on my 5.9 Windows Index, and 3DMark06 score. I have yet to run other tests overclocked.

And my overall "secret" as long as you don't give it out....Test, test again, test again, tweak, test again, kill more processes, test again, cool down, test again, reboot to flush memory leak cluster****, test again, tweak, cool, test again. SCORE!!


Quote:
Originally Posted by qhn View Post
Would you share the steps as how you can squeeze more out the benchmark? Settings? Tips?

That was a good jump from one day to another.

cheers ...
post #88 of 101
Cool. I am really looking for a template to be used here at NBF when we benchmark, just to be sure that all the factors and their values are being looked at - like in your input - CCC settings, no-unneeded-processes environment, multiplier, temp etc ...

cheers ...
post #89 of 101
Thread Starter 
I have a question that has yet to be answered though I asked several times. I submitted 6 benchmarks now, 4 are shown, credits given for 4 only. One of my benchmarks was Everest and I was told a section for Everest benchmarks would be added, but it has been several months but not added to the site yet. And it still isn't listed for my benchmarks submitted.

Maybe the 'Windows Vista Performance Index' can be ammended to 'Windows Vista/7 Performance Index' or similar in preparation for official release in a few months and to cover those running "Release Cantidate" versions.

I will create some new templates for my benchmarks to organize my changes/tweaks.
post #90 of 101
We are working on adding sub-categories in the benchmark area. You are not the only one who is being affected by this at the moment :-) Be patient with us.

Appreciate for the inputs in the benchmark template.

cheers ...
post #91 of 101
8970 is still 2000 points higher than what i had, and the only difference i know of is you're using windows 7 and you have faster hard drives. what resolution are you running it at?

nevermind i see you overclocked the graphics card. i dont think overclocking would do me good as i sometimes get artifacts without being overclocked (might be catalyst a.i. or something i dont know)
post #92 of 101
Thread Starter 
1024x768

I got just shy of 28,000 on 3DMark2001 SE which roasted my old score of 21,000. I am going to wait and see if I can break into the top 10 on this site before I submit it and that will only take 100 or so points so expect it soon. That was with NO cooling techniques and the core temps well over 100 at the start of the test, covers still attached, room for more overclocking etc... Wish me luck on hitting 30,000 but I know I won't hit what some of the laptops here have.

One thing that is concerning me is in PassMark 7.0 I got 2700 for 'cpu->integer math' when I first bought this laptop. Well a month or two ago I got 1100 but barely. Now I'm scoring about 380! WTF?? Other scores have dropped too, but many have improved greatly like GFX & Optical drive performance. I downgraded my bios back to the version that came on it but that did nothing.

Meh oh well, I probably broke it with my warranty-shredding habits. Guess that means it's time to upgrade to a new laptop!!! Yay! Anyone out there want a heavily abused, hacked up QuadLappy? I think it's time to get a Quad Extreme or wait on the i7 LapScorcher.
post #93 of 101
lol good luck on hitting 30k.

i think this laptop will do fine as a laptop for years to come, but if i ever want a real gaming beast i will get a desktop (probably build it myself).
post #94 of 101
nevermind what i wrote here lol

ever make it past 30k or past 9000 in 3dmarks?
post #95 of 101
one small discrepancy I noticed. Vista goes up to 5.9, and he has 3 7.0's. Are those 7.0's from the Win7 benchmark? If so, then I think a windows7 benchmark should be separated to keep vista and 7 scores from affecting each other. (a 7.0 on vista is impossible without tweaking the registry... whereas win7 goes up to 7.9 naturally).

Jason
post #96 of 101
The admins are working to include/separate W7 benchmarks results. It is still on hold due to the fact that W7 is not yet official. I have a bunch of benchmarks waiting in the side

cheers ...
post #97 of 101
question to NickWelder. How you overclocked Intel Core 2 QuadCore Q9000 in HP dv7-2040US - 2GHz --- 2246MHz, and did you check for artifacts your video card after overclocked?
post #98 of 101
Quote:
Originally Posted by kabangeka View Post
question to NickWelder. How you overclocked Intel Core 2 QuadCore Q9000 in HP dv7-2040US - 2GHz --- 2246MHz, and did you check for artifacts your video card after overclocked?
yea, how'd you OC the q9000... is the bios unlocked, or did you hack the mobo, or what?
post #99 of 101
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ganzonomy View Post
yea, how'd you OC the q9000... is the bios unlocked, or did you hack the mobo, or what?
A couple hacks I am working on have led me to keep the system operating stable at higher clock speeds. First hack involved adjusting the CPU multiplier to run at 8.5x. This worked until the BIOS promptly knocked it down again, and again, and again. I read through the Intel developer papers and found how this can be achieved. I attempted to hack the BIOS and set the FSB Clock via BCLK[1:0], but I was unable to get this working properly. I then attempted to force Dynamic Acceleration across all cores via the BIOS. Also a failure. I was able to hack up something very promising involving both a hacked BIOS and modified Linux kernel working in sync. Basically the BIOS no longer dismisses unauthorized dynamic acceleration. The hacked 2.6 Linux Kernel is constantly updating the CPU multiplier and forcing two cores to run idle 99.9% of the time. It seems voltage must be consistent across all 4 cores, even if two are "shut down" so no "stepping down" half the cores and that is something I am looking into.further. Intel doesn't seem to allow a way around this so it is either two overclocked & two off, or all normal, or all underclocked. Useful for many applications though.
post #100 of 101
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickWelder View Post
DavidTx, how about some benchmarks from you're machine?

I want to get 8GB not so much because I _NEED_ it, but because I am such a geek that I have to get it because I can. But if I DID have 8GB, I would probably max it out with Workstation loaded with multiple instances of assorted operating systems. One reason I like this laptop so much is because Firefox has not yet made an option to save all open tabs OFFLINE and load them up from cache upon restarting. I like to open 50+ tabs at the same time when doing research and then reading them later when I am out and about, most of the time being internetless. If I restart, I have to find internet access to load those pages, not always possible when out of the office. VMWare lets me start the machine right where it was before which is one of my #1 reasons why I like this machine. It runs an instance of XP 100% seamlessly with no glitches, twitches, or flinches during operation.

So DavidTx, what made you decide to settle with the dv7-2040US? Was it the fancy artwork that did you in too? I am getting the case silkscreened with the Rebel Flag. Waiting on finishing the design of a top secret laptop mod that will revolutionize the way mobile geeks "borrow" internet when on the road and it may involve putting the HP under the dremel to make things fit. I'll post the details, and possibly the schematics and parts list when I am done. Would have been close to completed but I had to order a new Arduino board that was small enough to fit where the TV Tuner went. Going to have to figure out how to either edit HP's hardware whitelist, or spoof the TV Tuner or WIFI Card's hardware IDs. I've said too much already. >)

Also, why do you have 2 posts, -60 Credits, and have been a member since Jan 2005? :P Weird...
@NickWelder, sorry I've been busting my hump on a business project that had me travelling quite a bit and am just now getting back to reading web forums such as this.

To answer your question, I have both a Macbook Pro Al and a Dell Inspiron 1520 completely tricked-out. Both notebooks were serving my needs very well for work and gaming, but would start to bog down when I'd need to run Eclipse plus any number more than two VM's, regardless of the CPU speed. I had looked at the Dell Precision M6400 when quad-core became available, but at nearly $7K for a quad-core 8GB model, the price, IMHO, was unreasonable. So I waited...

Then, when Intel released the Q9000/9100, I knew that more reasonably priced notebooks would follow and the Friday Fry's ad eventually bore fruit. I checked out several HP and Toshiba models, but they either only had one HD, crappy integrated graphics, or a really low-rez LCD. As it turns out, the dv7-2040us was actually an accident: I had gone to purchase another HP model, but it was out of stock. I had picked out the dv7 model with a Q9000 and Nvidia 9600GT graphics. However, it was out of stock when I arrived (Fry's must have only had 2 of them as I got there around 8:30 a.m.) So the salesman convinced me to check out the dv7-2040us. After a bit of in-store research, I realized it was a much better buy: better graphics, two drives (I had thought they were raided, but oh well), and an LED backlit panel. Plus it was $500 *less* than the advertised model. So I snatched it up along with a pair of 500gb Seagate drives. I haven't looked back since. It handles all of my work and play needs flawlessly. The only thing I haven't been able to do yet is hook it up to the 60" plasma/surround in the den via HDMI and see how that looks running WoW.

If I had a single complaint, it would be that the unit doesn't support either dual-link DVI or Displayport, so it can't run a 30" monitor at 2560x1920. If it did, I'd buy a docking station and ditch my desktop completely. Not giving up my Apple Cinema Display tho...
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › HP, Compaq and Voodoo Forums › HP, Compaq and Voodoo Notebook Benchmarks › HP dv7-2040US - Windows Performance Index 5.6