I never did any of the performance benchmarking tests that I probably should have, but here's what I did notice: I first tried the T7200 in my WinXP system and honestly didn't notice a huge difference over the T2400 that came in it - that system was pretty speedy as-is. Yes, programs lauched fractionally faster and it seemed to handle multiple tasks better, but it was a subtle change rather than a dramatic one.
I then decided to try the T7200 in my Vista system (the one from my sig that has Win 7 in it now) and it was dramatically faster at practically everything - launching programs, gaming, multitasking, etc. Out of the 2 operating systems, it seemed that the bloated and resource hungry Vista really could make the best use out of this sudden increase in processing power, so I left it in that laptop. Having said that, if I come across another T7XXX series processor for the right price someday, I may eventually upgrade the XP machine even though it doesn't seem to need it as much.
I then decided to try the T7200 in my Vista system (the one from my sig that has Win 7 in it now) and it was dramatically faster at practically everything - launching programs, gaming, multitasking, etc. Out of the 2 operating systems, it seemed that the bloated and resource hungry Vista really could make the best use out of this sudden increase in processing power, so I left it in that laptop. Having said that, if I come across another T7XXX series processor for the right price someday, I may eventually upgrade the XP machine even though it doesn't seem to need it as much.



As for upgrading your 9400/e1705, here's what I'd recommend (as I have done the upgrades you're asking about).
.

Can anyone else confirm this? That would be the good news I was hoping to hear about this upgrade!
Thanks!

