NotebookForums.com › Forums › General Notebook Discussions › Notebook Forums - General › travel laptop with solid google earth performance
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

travel laptop with solid google earth performance

post #1 of 9
Thread Starter 
my dad recently asked me for help locating a laptop that would suit his particular needs.

  • used equally for travel and couch computing.
  • would be used primarily for web browsing/e-mail/word processing, but needs to be able to offer solid performance for google earth and other mapping software. (this is the primary determining factor).
  • the other primary use of the machine would be offloading photo storage from sd cards to the laptop while on a trip, so a built in sd card reader would be a huge bonus for ease of use.
  • preferably in the 14" and 15" range, though 13" would also be acceptable.
  • maximizing battery life would be optimal, but not at the cost of mapping software performance.
  • would like at least a dual-core processor.
  • he's hoping for something in the $600 range, but anything less than $900 is in the realm of possibility.

from what i've read, no onboard graphics card can really offer solid performance for google earth - but a top of the line dedicated card certainly isn't needed. after some searching, it looks to me like the Asus UL series with swappable graphics would offer the best combination of performance and battery life.

(newegg linky for 3 of the models)

i'm wondering a few things, and am open to any and all suggestions, including a heads up for anything slated to be released within the next 6 months. i don't care about brand, provided that it's reputable and decent quality.
  1. has anyone seen or used any of this line of laptop? if so, are the viewing angles as poor as the newegg reviews seem to indicate?
  2. is there a laptop with only dedicated graphics and similar/greater gpu power that can offer anywhere near the battery life that this line does (and yes, i realize that the stated times are probably BS)
  3. can anyone clue me in to what the baseline for smooth google earth operation is with respect to mobile gpus and processors?
  4. the 1.3ghz processor seems pretty underpowered compared to what can be had at the same price point. i imagine it's perfectly adequate for what this computer would be used for, but it makes it seem like the ability to switch between onboard and dedicated graphics comes at a pretty steep price. any thoughts on whether it's worth it?
  5. the listed 1366x768 resolution seems awfully weird, but it seems fairly common these days - can anyone comment on it?
thanks in advance
post #2 of 9
From Google itself, the "recommended" system requirements for running Google Earth:
Quote:
Recommended:

* Operating System: Windows XP or Windows Vista
* CPU: Pentium 4 2.4GHz+ or AMD 2400xp+
* System Memory (RAM): 512MB
* Hard Disk: 2GB free space
* Network Speed: 768 Kbits/sec
* Graphics Card: 3D-capable with 32MB of VRAM
* Screen: 1280x1024, "32-bit True Color"
One important to note here is the network speed! I believe that htis would determine the smoothness of Google Earth presentation. Other than that one can use pretty much whatever is being offered at the moment on the net-book/notebook market.

. Viewing angle: I feel that this is a personal preference than what you read. Best thing is making a stop to a local shop and check it out for yourself.

. You can also look into some Acer models for good pricing machines with relative long battery life. CULV and Atom CPUs machines are good with battery life.

. 15" plus screen with LED 1366x768 is being considered a step up from 1200x800, and geared toward media presentation format, so it is fine with me personally.

cheers ...
post #3 of 9
the 14" Asus UL80Vt is a good choice. Engadget reviewed it and was amazed that their battery test actually exceeded the advertised battery life by a half hour. Also, as I recall Asus has software that can automatically overclock the 1.3 Ghz CPU to 1.7 Ghz, which would give some improvement. However, if you want something more "mainstream" instead of "thin and light", there's always this: Asus X83VP-X1 link or this: Asus K40IN-C2 link

Quote:
Originally Posted by qhn
CULV and Atom CPUs machines are good with battery life.
true, but an Atom processor would not be able to run Google Earth smoothly, according to the specs you posted. The processor needs to be more powerful. However, most CULV CPUs and all standard or medium voltage CPU would work fine.

Quote:
Originally Posted by zem
the listed 1366x768 resolution seems awfully weird, but it seems fairly common these days - can anyone comment on it?
Many notebooks are going to the 16:9 ratio common in movies. My guess is that it's a result of either movie studios or LCD manufacturers pushing the idea of playing widescreen movies on a notebook with no letterbox lines, but I could be wrong.
post #4 of 9
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by qhn View Post
From Google itself, the "recommended" system requirements for running Google Earth
*snip*
yeah, i found those too...but i can't really imagine google earth running all that smoothly on a system with those specs. i figured i could throw it out there, and maye someone would have experience with systems of varying power, and could estimate a decent baseline for good performance...

Quote:
Originally Posted by qhn View Post
15" plus screen with LED 1366x768 is being considered a step up from 1200x800, and geared toward media presentation format
Quote:
Originally Posted by Djembe View Post
Many notebooks are going to the 16:9 ratio common in movies.
ah, so that's where it's from. good to know.

thanks for your input, qhn and dj. *tip of the hat*

and thanks for pointing me at those other models...
post #5 of 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by Djembe View Post
...
true, but an Atom processor would not be able to run Google Earth smoothly, according to the specs you posted. The processor needs to be more powerful. However, most CULV CPUs and all standard or medium voltage CPU would work fine.

...
Google should update its requirement specs for Google Earth. A pentium and a amd xp is so stone-age Granted that the Atom shows up at less Hertz than these 2 CPUs, current Atom net-books are being built with different and better architecture. CPU alone can't run a system

Found this on Youtube, quite smooth performance for a small machine.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qemXhTlReeA

cheers ...
post #6 of 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by Djembe View Post
the 14" Asus UL80Vt is a good choice. ..
Another pleasant surprise from ASUS ... A 12-hrs running notebook with power!

ASUS UL80JT!

cheers ...
post #7 of 9
The Asus ULV's are the way to go. Google Earth is coded for shit so do not use that as a guide. That said the Asus ULV's will do fine. But that is about the worst written app out there. Makes M$ look like f'ing geniuses. Be careful of the standards you set especially with crap applications. GE sucks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Why buy a system based on how well it handles crap?
post #8 of 9
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by qhn View Post
Another pleasant surprise from ASUS ... A 12-hrs running notebook with power!

ASUS UL80JT!

cheers ...
overpowered for what my dad needs...but holy cow, i want that for ME
post #9 of 9
I thought with price hovering around $900 everything is fair game Can't be overpowered for that price, non?

cheers ...
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Notebook Forums - General
NotebookForums.com › Forums › General Notebook Discussions › Notebook Forums - General › travel laptop with solid google earth performance