Hi. I am planning to buy a laptop for normal use (Internet, movies, basic office use of word / excel / ppt, Chat, Video chat etc)
I have shortlisted two choices and am confused between them. Would greatly apreciate advise.
1. COMPAQ CQ62 105TU
Specs:
Windows 7 Home Premium
15.6″ inch (1366×768 pixels) HP BrightView Widescreen Display
Intel Core i3-330M Processor (2.13GHz, 3MB L2 Cache)
Integrated Intel Graphics
3GB DDR3 RAM
320GB Hard Disk
DVD Writer with Double Layer Support
3 USB 2.0, 1 HDMI, 1 VGA, 1 RJ-11, 1 RJ-45, 1 Stereo headphone-out, 1 Microphone in
Altec Lansing stereo speakers
Webcam with Mic
Wireless LAN 802.11b/g
Bluetooth
Card Reader
6-cell Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion) battery
65 W AC Power Adapter
Weight: 2.6 kg
1 year Warranty
COST - Rs.36000 (About 720 US dollors)
2. SONY VAIO VPCEB14EN/B1
Intel® Core™ i3-330M Processor 2.13 GHz
• Genuine Windows® 7 Home Basic (64-bit)
• 15.5 (39.37 cm) wide (WXGA: 1366 x 768) VAIO Display
• Instant web browsing: Quick Web Access button
• Isolation keyboard with 19mm full key pitch and numeric keypad
Graphics Accelerator ATI Mobility Radeon™ HD 5470 Graphics Dedicated Video Memory 512 MB DDR3 SDRAM
3GB DDR3 RAM
320GB Hard Disk
DVD±RW/±R DL/RAM Drive
Front Side Camera Effective pixels: 640 x 480
VGP-BPS22 Lithium-ion battery: 6 Cell
2.7 kg (including the supplied battery)
COST - Rs.39000 (780 USD)
The compaq has got Windows 7 Home premium Vs Sony Vaio which is Home Basic 64 Bit. What is the difference? Is it possible for me to upgrade to Home Premium? If so, how?
Sony has got 512 MB dedicated video memory which Compaq doesnt
The speakers on the compaq are altec lansing. But they are really weak / feabile even at full volume with different players. Comparitively, the speakers on the Vaio were pretty good. This really bothers me.
I am assuming that both the laptops have got the same camera.
The sony did seem a bit sluggish when I tested its webcam application. Could this be a one off or would the above Sony Vaio config be slower than the above compaq confiq.
There. Have put out most of the data I have. Look forward to your views.
Rgds,
Victor
I have shortlisted two choices and am confused between them. Would greatly apreciate advise.
1. COMPAQ CQ62 105TU
Specs:
Windows 7 Home Premium
15.6″ inch (1366×768 pixels) HP BrightView Widescreen Display
Intel Core i3-330M Processor (2.13GHz, 3MB L2 Cache)
Integrated Intel Graphics
3GB DDR3 RAM
320GB Hard Disk
DVD Writer with Double Layer Support
3 USB 2.0, 1 HDMI, 1 VGA, 1 RJ-11, 1 RJ-45, 1 Stereo headphone-out, 1 Microphone in
Altec Lansing stereo speakers
Webcam with Mic
Wireless LAN 802.11b/g
Bluetooth
Card Reader
6-cell Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion) battery
65 W AC Power Adapter
Weight: 2.6 kg
1 year Warranty
COST - Rs.36000 (About 720 US dollors)
2. SONY VAIO VPCEB14EN/B1
Intel® Core™ i3-330M Processor 2.13 GHz
• Genuine Windows® 7 Home Basic (64-bit)
• 15.5 (39.37 cm) wide (WXGA: 1366 x 768) VAIO Display
• Instant web browsing: Quick Web Access button
• Isolation keyboard with 19mm full key pitch and numeric keypad
Graphics Accelerator ATI Mobility Radeon™ HD 5470 Graphics Dedicated Video Memory 512 MB DDR3 SDRAM
3GB DDR3 RAM
320GB Hard Disk
DVD±RW/±R DL/RAM Drive
Front Side Camera Effective pixels: 640 x 480
VGP-BPS22 Lithium-ion battery: 6 Cell
2.7 kg (including the supplied battery)
COST - Rs.39000 (780 USD)
The compaq has got Windows 7 Home premium Vs Sony Vaio which is Home Basic 64 Bit. What is the difference? Is it possible for me to upgrade to Home Premium? If so, how?
Sony has got 512 MB dedicated video memory which Compaq doesnt
The speakers on the compaq are altec lansing. But they are really weak / feabile even at full volume with different players. Comparitively, the speakers on the Vaio were pretty good. This really bothers me.
I am assuming that both the laptops have got the same camera.
The sony did seem a bit sluggish when I tested its webcam application. Could this be a one off or would the above Sony Vaio config be slower than the above compaq confiq.
There. Have put out most of the data I have. Look forward to your views.
Rgds,
Victor








