Title says it all.
From what I hear, Fuji makes great screens. The extra screen size is definately a plus, as is the battery life over the S5N.
But size is a factor. I only wonder if the S5N is worth the loss of that extra pound. I saw a clip of Call For Help on TechTV, good god that thing is light, thin as a childen's picture book. The way it is configured, S5N does have a slight advantage in memory and harddisk space though.
Opinions? Hows the Asus screen? Anyone know the speed of the fuji HDs? 256mb too little for the Fuji? 2.9 pound S5N significantly lighter? (about 30% lighter...)
From what I hear, Fuji makes great screens. The extra screen size is definately a plus, as is the battery life over the S5N.
But size is a factor. I only wonder if the S5N is worth the loss of that extra pound. I saw a clip of Call For Help on TechTV, good god that thing is light, thin as a childen's picture book. The way it is configured, S5N does have a slight advantage in memory and harddisk space though.
Opinions? Hows the Asus screen? Anyone know the speed of the fuji HDs? 256mb too little for the Fuji? 2.9 pound S5N significantly lighter? (about 30% lighter...)





