I just checked mine and the GPU setting is also 405/270.
The camera is much brighter and a little slower than the old one ..
The camera is much brighter and a little slower than the old one ..
Not sure if you've checked it out before or not, but you might want to give Firefox a swing (mozilla.org). The only time I use IE now is for Windows Update. I like Firefox much better and tabbed browsing is absolutely the best (altho' there are programs that you can DL that will give you that functionality in IE).|
Originally Posted by Go-Omaha
A couple of hours ago, I received a script error followed by a memory error in IE. I am running the extended memtest86. I upgrades to the new version 3.1a this morning after receiving the error.
Hope that this is just an application error. So far memtest86 has not reported any errors. It has just completed Pass #1 (38+ Minutes for the first 11 Passes). It is now on pass 12 and I'm not sure what that is or how long it takes. WIll keep you posted. OK, this Pass #12 is a new one. You might want to only do this if you intend to go to bed for an extended period of time. It writes to memory, waits 90 minutes, verifies that nothing changed, and then does this a few more times. I have restarted the tests w/o this feature. |
|
Originally Posted by profiteur
Time shift is not useless!
You must adjust the sound with the ''recording'' slider in audio options. The remote control adjust live audio volume only. Resolution is 320x240 and 30fps, wich i think is close to broadcast tv. Yes you do lose a little quality but it's great to be able to pause live tv and then skip the commercials. If you look at time shift options there is 3 quality settings : good, better and best. Better and best are blanked off for me and i can only use the ''good'' setting. Below is a CPU speed wich is supposed to be the recommended for the selected quality. It says 2800Mhz on my machine, and i only have a 2.8Ghz CPU (no way i was going to pay Eurocom's 1$/Mhz upgrade price) so maybe this is why i am stuck with the lower setting. Can you check your time shift options and tell me what you have? |
|
Originally Posted by FriedToast
...a memory error in IE.
Oooh, G, you're using IE. No wonder you're getting errors Not sure if you've checked it out before or not, but you might want to give Firefox a swing (mozilla.org). The only time I use IE now is for Windows Update. I like Firefox much better and tabbed browsing is absolutely the best (altho' there are programs that you can DL that will give you that functionality in IE). |
|
Originally Posted by profiteur
Time shift is not useless!
You must adjust the sound with the ''recording'' slider in audio options. The remote control adjust live audio volume only. Resolution is 320x240 and 30fps, wich i think is close to broadcast tv. Yes you do lose a little quality but it's great to be able to pause live tv and then skip the commercials. If you look at time shift options there is 3 quality settings : good, better and best. Better and best are blanked off for me and i can only use the ''good'' setting. Below is a CPU speed wich is supposed to be the recommended for the selected quality. It says 2800Mhz on my machine, and i only have a 2.8Ghz CPU (no way i was going to pay Eurocom's 1$/Mhz upgrade price) so maybe this is why i am stuck with the lower setting. Can you check your time shift options and tell me what you have? |
|
Originally Posted by Go-Omaha
I still stand by my original statement. -- USELESS -- There are three settings; however, only one is enabled and that is the 320*240 resolution. This is not TV Quality -- that is 720 x 480. I may look at their documentation if I can find something larger than the "insert" that was included with the remote.
|
, I was wondering if anyone had tried the Windows Media 9 High Definition demos on the 8790 - they should look stunning on it. They can be found at http://www.wmvhd.com|
Originally Posted by Each Hit
..Beyond that boring stuff
, I was wondering if anyone had tried the Windows Media 9 High Definition demos on the 8790 - they should look stunning on it. They can be found at http://www.wmvhd.com |
|
Originally Posted by Go-Omaha
Shank,
Thanks for the info. I guess the 525 for NTSC (circa 1953) is a bit different than we both have observed. Anyway, the time delay is NOT about the same as VHS quality or it would like a VHS that is attached to the tuner. It simply is not.... it is very bad...blotchy, blurry, and the colors run iton each other. I watch the TV on the screen from the "live source" and it looks very clear and clean, then hit the "time delay" and everything gets real muddy and blurry and the colors tend to bleed like crazy. Additionally, the sound is superamplified and overdrived - distorted. If I record the same signal - none of this "bad behavior" is evident. A TiVo replacement, this thing is not.... simply useless .... unless I take off my glasses --- then it all looks blurry. All things considered, mayber your system is better than mine. Mine simply stks. |
|
Originally Posted by Each Hit
I could be wrong, but ...
DVD all aspect ratios (NTSC) is 720 x 480 @ 4:2:0 4:3 H rez = 540 lines max (720 x 3/4) - skinny pixels 16:9 H rez = 405 lines max (720 x 9/16) - fat pixels 16:9 DVD with 4:3 extraction has H rez of 405 lines, or 540 x 480. The horiz rezes are theoretical, LP filters reduce this around 10%. Bdcst TV = ~420 x 480 (based on 4 Mhz BW @ 80 lines/Mhz= 320 x 4/3). Bdcst TV is analog so there isn't a direct conversion. Most consumer tuners are not too flat in freq response either, so the horiz detail is further reduced. VHS= 240 lines (3 Mhz) x 4/3 = 320 x 480. Color H rez is very low (.3 Mhz) due to hetrodyne color under system. High lum freqs are quite noisy too. Vertical resolution is not affected by bandwidth limitations- it's directly related to the number of scan lines. The .7 Kell factor could be considered which effectively lowers vertical resolution, but this is true for all scanned images. Interlace lowers that even more. Analog has horizontal detail loss from HF rolloff. Mpeg has losses in both H & V detail from the input filtering & the DCT quantizing matrix, so smaller detail amplitudes are reduced more than larger ones. Beyond that boring stuff , I was wondering if anyone had tried the Windows Media 9 High Definition demos on the 8790 - they should look stunning on it. They can be found at http://www.wmvhd.com |