NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Asus Forums › Asus Notebook Reviews › Review: Review of Asus W1N
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Review: Review of Asus W1N

post #1 of 22
Thread Starter 
Asus W1772 - This is a UK model and may not be available in the US with this configuration.

Banias 1.7Ghz Pentium M
ATI 9600 64Mb
1024Mb RAM
80Gb HDD
DVD RW
TV Tuner

First impressions are pretty good. The latch-less fastening for the lid is a great idea (probably pinched from Apple) that works well. Most of the socketery is hidden behind a discreet flap so it doesn’t compromise the looks. The bushed steel chassis looks good and lends an air of durability. Lots of nice touches like the backlit power button and LED status display on the front edge of the notebook. Nice hinge detail for the screen. Overall it looks understated and well built.

Opening up the boxes yields a few ‘extras’, a tiny brushed aluminium Logitech mouse with scroll wheel. A nylon Targus bag with ‘Asus’ stamped on it. Various adaptors and cables for the TV tuner and the usual power supply, disks and manuals. Only a Win XP recovery disk though.

Turning it on the first thing that wows you is the screen, it’s a WSXGA wonder, a massive 1680 x 1050 pixels resolution. It looks clean and crisp, although some of the icons and text are arguably a bit on the small side. Viewing angles seem good, although brightness suffers in comparison with sony’s best. Still, it more than holds it’s own against my desktop TFT screen.

There are a few pre-installed applications, nothing to get too excited about though. Windows XP Pro is a welcome improvement over the usual XP Home. There’s a clutch of Asus’s own utilities including the Mobile Theatre package discussed below. On the packaged CD’s is Nero Express and a few games.

It runs quietly and without too much heat. The top of the keyboard area stays cool with most of the hot air kicked out of the bottom and right hand side, I guess this is the advantage of Pentium M. Battery life is hard to assess just yet, but a mix of installing, browsing and checking email with the screen on max brightness will probably provide 2.5-3.5 hrs of battery life. I’ll update this when I’ve had more time to play with it. Performance wise it seems to be quite responsive outpacing my 2.5Ghz P4 in some tasks although the HDD is a little slow, it doesn’t seem very noticeable in general use. Wireless networking was a doddle to set up at home, connecting to my office network was, however, a bit more difficult, through no fault of the laptop though. The DVD writer seems a little temperamental preferring 1x to the max 2.5x write speed, but I’m sure the quality of the media will have a role to play in this.

The 64Mb 9600 video card performs better than expected hitting benchmarks of 2440 in 3D Mark 03 and 9167 in 3D Mark 2001SE. It runs Far Cry at native resolution with low settings and high terrain detail (which looks pretty good) in a playable fashion, but clearly this isn’t a games machine. My desktop 2.5Ghz P4 with an ATI 9800 makes mincemeat of it in this regard. It is perfectly capable of providing a bit of on-the-move gaming though. Sound is adequate, but despite a subwoofer in the base it’s never going to be wonderful. I wanted to connect it to my desktop CRT, Keyboard and mouse at work so I was pleased to discover it has no problems running through a USB KVM switch. The resolution settings need adjusting for the 4:3 CRT, but it works just fine. I’ve also tried connecting it up to a 42” plasma producing a great picture when playing back DVDs, AVIs and Far Cry.

The TV tuner and associated Mobile Theatre software is a mixed bag, it works, but it’s a bit unwieldy. Asus’ software isn’t particularly elegant and it took several goes to figure out how to make it all work. An adaptor is required for the notebook to accept a UK aerial lead (provided with the notebook) which has presumably been designed for Far East or North American markets. Picture quality is ok though and you can record direct from source onto the HDD. Bizarrely, despite the 16:10 screen ratio it only seems to display the TV input as 4:3, even when feed a widescreen picture from my Sky+ box. DVDs will run in widescreen however.

On the down side the remote control supplied with the TV tuner doesn’t seem to work and the HDD is annoyingly formatted as FAT32 rather than NTFS (although this was easy to rectify). Whenever I boot up the Num Lock function seems to be on, defaulting certain keys to numbers, on several occasions I’ve found it difficult to log on because of this. I eventually had to sort out the num lock setting in the bios.

On the whole it seems a slick package and it fulfils my critical requirement of having a WSXGA screen, I’m sure I can resolve the few minor faults I’ve uncovered given time.

Some links to pictures I've taken:

image 1

image 2

image 3

image 4
post #2 of 22
They dont get much prettier than that.

Were those benchmark scores at native res, or 1024x768?

Are you able to access both RAM slots from the bottom of the unit, or do you need to remove the keyboard to get to the second slot?

Speaking of which, how is the keyboard?

And lastly, how well does the LCD work outside its native res, some are ok others are horrible in this regard.

Thanks for taking the time to give us your impressions.
post #3 of 22
Thread Starter 
Benchmarks at 1024 x 768. Don't know about RAM access. Keyboard is ok, but not as good as a 'proper one'. LCD is ok outside it's native res for gaming and movies but text is a bit ugly.
post #4 of 22
Nice review and nice system! If they keep making them look like that I dunno how long my mitac is gonna last
post #5 of 22
Hi,

Does your model has the led display that is part of the tv tuner?
What kind of information does it show ?
post #6 of 22
You said that the notebook looks very strong, because of his aluminium cover. But I read in a review that the metal is not very strong, that it was very easy to bend it. What is your opinion about that?

Great review, within a few weeks I'm going to buy one of those beautifull notebooks
post #7 of 22
Thread Starter 
My W1N has the LED display on the front edge. it shows info such as which part of the Mobile Theatre software is in use (TV, DVD etc) and which channel number. There are also lights indicating battery charging, wireless use and email arrival.

If you apply a little force there is some flex in the screen area, as you would expect in most notebooks, but I wouldn't say it was easy to bend. You can lift it open it from a single point in the centre of the screen without it flexing at all. I suppose the metal finish provides the illusion of a robust piece of equipment rather than the reality of it. But it stands up well against most other notebooks I have seen and used.
post #8 of 22
Flydesign.nl:

What review were you referring to? Can you please send me the link
post #9 of 22
http://www.pcpro.co.uk/?http://www.p...y.php?id=57542

Quote:
The lid is made of metal too, but our cautious tests suggest it won't survive a harsh, direct knock.
post #10 of 22
that looks pretty slick, good choice of laptop mouse
post #11 of 22
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flydesign.nl
Well I suppose it depends what you're knocking it with, if it's a hammer then no, it probably won't survive. If its your knuckles then I think you'd be ok. I would say its no less durable than any other laptop screen, more so than most. Whatever the case is made of, if you treat it roughly it will suffer.
post #12 of 22

Gaming Performance?

Hi,

I was wondering if you could comment on the gaming performance? We all know this is not a hardcore gaming rig, with that said.....How well will the W1N play Battelfield 1942 and also Far Cry....or any similar style game.

You got an awesome laptop...I love the sllek lines!!


Kilgor
post #13 of 22
Thread Starter 
I have play tested Far Cry and found it very playable at native resolution with low textures and high terrain detail (still looks great too). The keyboard isn't too hot for WASD FPS style gaming though, I would prefer a 'normal' keyboard for extended play. Having said that you could have a lot of fun playing games on the W1N on the road. You might be a bit disappointed if it was your primary games platform though, particularly as games these days demand ever more powerful systems and like most laptops (alienware being the only exception I think) you can't swap out to a more potent video card to keep up.

At the end of the day I'm going to stick to my P4 for hardcore gaming, though I may use the W1N now and again when away from home.
post #14 of 22
In the end with all things considered, do you think you would buy the W1N again? The cool design makes the W1N hands down the winner in the 15.4 class. I agree the sceen resolution 1680 x 1050 is totally the best native laptop screen.

The only other option is the Dell 8600. It seems to be a little beefier in the video card department, but quite a few steps down in sheer design.

Did you even look at the 8600 before buying the W1N?

Thanks
Kilgor
post #15 of 22
Thread Starter 
I did briefly consider the Dell 9100, but both it and the 8600 are no where near as stylish as the W1N. I would certainly buy it again.
post #16 of 22
Hi,

M6 is now available with R 9700 64M video card, do you think they will use this card on W1 in a few (two +/-) months ?
post #17 of 22
I recall reading a news coverage of the W1N at the recent Computex Show in Taipei that the updated W1N will have a Dothan CPU. But no mention on any GPU changes though. Seems logical to upgrade both the CPU and GPU at the same time though.
post #18 of 22
Can you show the link for that coverage ?
thx
post #19 of 22
Thread Starter 
I asked Asus about a GPU upgrade a while ago and their response was 'later this year'. But it could be sooner rather than later.
post #20 of 22
Can you provide a bit more detail about the sound quality and about running it at lower resolutions? HOw does text look at 1280 x 960 or 10x7 ?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Asus Notebook Reviews
NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Asus Forums › Asus Notebook Reviews › Review: Review of Asus W1N