Well, well, well... aren't you lot all a bit touchy!!
1. I have checked out the screen clearance issue and those who say the Sony lid is poorer are in FANTASYLAND. I don't know which Sony model you are talking about, but the lid on mine is only marginally closer to the LCD than the 8887, and is totally rigid - I need to exert some serious pressure on it to either push it in or flex the screen. NOT SO with the 8887 screen, which wobbles around when you touch it. Fact. I have been using laptops and notebooks since 1989, and know enough about build quality to make a pretty informed judgement.
2. Of course I am aware of the Sony bloatware/recovery CD nonsense. Big deal. When I bought the machine I simply reinstalled from my existing XP CD, reactivated, and then installed the Sony drivers, which are conveniently in a seperate folder on one of the CDs you get with the machine (just like the Sager).
3. THe GPU on my system is NOT overclocked, ridiculously or otherwise. In fact it appears to have been rather UNDERclocked - using the ATI overclocking tool I have squeezed about 20% more Mhz from both the memory and engine clocks without any artifacting AT ALL in any 3d games. Also, the Sony has a dedicated GPU cooling fan and duct, which means it's probably a lot safer to overclock than many laptops.
4. Just because I don't need ultra-fast 3d performance doesn't mean I am not a "power user." Or do power users only play games? The programs I mostly use, QuarkXpress 5.0 and Photoshop 7.0, don't need that much video power, but they sure need plenty of RAM and processor Mhz. They are both almost unuseable on a typical laptop LCD, but the 16.1" SXGA screen gives me desktop resolution both on the move and at the office.
Sorry to be the fly in the ointment, but I am still happier with the Sony - it's lighter, stronger and will probably last much longer, and if it means I can't play GTA3 at 50 fps it's a small penalty to pay.
1. I have checked out the screen clearance issue and those who say the Sony lid is poorer are in FANTASYLAND. I don't know which Sony model you are talking about, but the lid on mine is only marginally closer to the LCD than the 8887, and is totally rigid - I need to exert some serious pressure on it to either push it in or flex the screen. NOT SO with the 8887 screen, which wobbles around when you touch it. Fact. I have been using laptops and notebooks since 1989, and know enough about build quality to make a pretty informed judgement.
2. Of course I am aware of the Sony bloatware/recovery CD nonsense. Big deal. When I bought the machine I simply reinstalled from my existing XP CD, reactivated, and then installed the Sony drivers, which are conveniently in a seperate folder on one of the CDs you get with the machine (just like the Sager).
3. THe GPU on my system is NOT overclocked, ridiculously or otherwise. In fact it appears to have been rather UNDERclocked - using the ATI overclocking tool I have squeezed about 20% more Mhz from both the memory and engine clocks without any artifacting AT ALL in any 3d games. Also, the Sony has a dedicated GPU cooling fan and duct, which means it's probably a lot safer to overclock than many laptops.
4. Just because I don't need ultra-fast 3d performance doesn't mean I am not a "power user." Or do power users only play games? The programs I mostly use, QuarkXpress 5.0 and Photoshop 7.0, don't need that much video power, but they sure need plenty of RAM and processor Mhz. They are both almost unuseable on a typical laptop LCD, but the 16.1" SXGA screen gives me desktop resolution both on the move and at the office.
Sorry to be the fly in the ointment, but I am still happier with the Sony - it's lighter, stronger and will probably last much longer, and if it means I can't play GTA3 at 50 fps it's a small penalty to pay.





Play a few games and let us know if you like your new laptop...






