NotebookForums.com › Forums › General Notebook Discussions › Notebook Forums - General › 802.11g officially downgraded by the IEEE
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

802.11g officially downgraded by the IEEE

post #1 of 12
Thread Starter 
this just in...

Quote:
"Computerworld reports that in order to step on fewer 802.11b toes, the IEEE has reduced the actual throughput of 802.11g in its latest (and allegedly final) draft. I think I might keep old firmware on my linksys AP and card so that I can at least pretend I have faster gear." It's been moved from 54Mbps all the way down to 10-20Mbps, more than just a slight change.
here's the link
post #2 of 12
Oh the HORROR!


Can't wait for the HACKs...

-myrkat
post #3 of 12
what a bunch of idiots...

reminds me of the FCC who will approve media monopoly next week even though 99% of all public comments where against it.

**** the standards. They are suppost to make technology more useable, but, they are used to retard technology. I mean... I use a 80211G with a B card and it works fine... The only use I see for standards is to keep companies like sony from changing their power cord plugs every 18 months., which doesn't stop them anyway.
post #4 of 12
Think their bad, check out how many HDTV standards the FCC still wants to use...

The revolution will not be televised in HDTV...

-myrkat
post #5 of 12
I just read the article and it states that the ACTUAL throughput is about 10Mbps in a mixed mode environment and 20Mbps in a pure g environment... That is pretty much how it operates at the moment, you are quite lucky to get a full 20Mbps from 802.11g equipment. It seems to me as if they are just publicly stating realistic speed goals, not actually changing them.
post #6 of 12
Quote:
Originally posted by mdchaser
I just read the article and it states that the ACTUAL throughput is about 10Mbps in a mixed mode environment and 20Mbps in a pure g environment... That is pretty much how it operates at the moment, you are quite lucky to get a full 20Mbps from 802.11g equipment. It seems to me as if they are just publicly stating realistic speed goals, not actually changing them.
well the draft spec has been 54 mbps not 20mbps quite a difference so it has been lowered if this is correct..
post #7 of 12
802.11b is supposed to get 11Mbps, actual is about 5. 802.11a is supposed to get 54Mbps, actual is just over 20. Telling people that 802.11g equipment will only operate at 20Mbps in pure mode is simply stating the obvious (hopefully no one expected the whole 54Mbps as it has never approached this). The only change is when operating in a mixed mode environment where 802.11g will operate at about half speed (still twice as fast as 802.11b). There have been interoperability problems between b and g the whole time, the standards body is simply spelling them out.
post #8 of 12
before you bash IEEE, please look up some reviews of the 802.11g gear that is out there now. the actual thoroughput IS 10-20mbps. This is not a firmware reduction, this is just stating the obvious.
post #9 of 12
Quote:
Originally posted by NeoTechPC
before you bash IEEE, please look up some reviews of the 802.11g gear that is out there now. the actual thoroughput IS 10-20mbps. This is not a firmware reduction, this is just stating the obvious.
The throughput for the draft standard was 54 so they did reduce it.. my 802.11g Buffalo 54g stays at around 48mbps.

read up
http://www.computerworld.com/mobilet...,81450,00.html
post #10 of 12
looks to me that THG was testing 802.11g at about 20mbps

http://www17.tomshardware.com/networ...etgear-06.html
post #11 of 12
Quote:
Originally posted by myrkat
Think their bad, check out how many HDTV standards the FCC still wants to use...

The revolution will not be televised in HDTV...

-myrkat
Hey myrkat, you like Gill Scott Heron? I first heard that song in the movie hurricane.
post #12 of 12
Quote:
Originally posted by Wisefish
Hey myrkat, you like Gill Scott Heron? I first heard that song in the movie hurricane.
Not a big fan, but I can respect his artistic ability (much more than many "entertainers" who claim to be for civil rights/equality now-a-days)...

For those who do not know, I (shamelessly) paraphrased Gil Heron's work:

The revolution will no be televised
You will not be able to stay home, brother.
You will not be able to plug in, turn on and cop out.
You will not be able to lose yourself on skag and skip,
Skip out for beer during commercials,
Because the revolution will not be televised.

The revolution will not be televised.
The revolution will not be brought to you by Xerox
In 4 parts without commercial interruptions.
The revolution will not show you pictures of Nixon
blowing a bugle and leading a charge by John
Mitchell, General Abrams and Spiro Agnew to eat
hog maws confiscated from a Harlem sanctuary.

The revolution will not be televised.
The revolution will not be brought to you by the
Schaefer Award Theatre and will not star Natalie
Woods and Steve McQueen or Bullwinkle and Julia.
The revolution will not give your mouth sex appeal.
The revolution will not get rid of the nubs.
The revolution will not make you look five pounds
thinner, because the revolution will not be televised, Brother.

There will be no pictures of you and Willie May
pushing that shopping cart down the block on the dead run,
or trying to slide that color television into a stolen ambulance.
NBC will not be able predict the winner at 8:32
or report from 29 districts.
The revolution will not be televised.

There will be no pictures of pigs shooting down
brothers in the instant replay.
There will be no pictures of pigs shooting down
brothers in the instant replay.
There will be no pictures of Whitney Young being
run out of Harlem on a rail with a brand new process.
There will be no slow motion or still life of Roy
Wilkens strolling through Watts in a Red, Black and
Green liberation jumpsuit that he had been saving
For just the proper occasion.

Green Acres, The Beverly Hillbillies, and Hooterville
Junction will no longer be so damned relevant, and
women will not care if Dick finally gets down with
Jane on Search for Tomorrow because Black people
will be in the street looking for a brighter day.
The revolution will not be televised.

There will be no highlights on the eleven o'clock
news and no pictures of hairy armed women
liberationists and Jackie Onassis blowing her nose.
The theme song will not be written by Jim Webb,
Francis Scott Key, nor sung by Glen Campbell, Tom
Jones, Johnny Cash, Englebert Humperdink, or the Rare Earth.
The revolution will not be televised.

The revolution will not be right back
after a message about a white tornado, white lightning, or white people.
You will not have to worry about a dove in your
bedroom, a tiger in your tank, or the giant in your toilet bowl.
The revolution will not go better with Coke.
The revolution will not fight the germs that may cause bad breath.
The revolution will put you in the driver's seat.

The revolution will not be televised, will not be televised,
will not be televised, will not be televised.
The revolution will be no re-run brothers;
The revolution will be live.


Ironically, back then it was mainly "hate whitey" type stuff, but really, applied to today, perhaps he was more aware than people gave him credit for... Now it's more "hate corporations" than anything with racism and equality (well, social equality).

-myrkat
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Notebook Forums - General
NotebookForums.com › Forums › General Notebook Discussions › Notebook Forums - General › 802.11g officially downgraded by the IEEE