New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Don't Cheat On Futuremark, Guys - Page 5

post #81 of 90
8/26/04 at 2:33pm
I did take a real pic of the screen when it happened which I will post in a few hours(I didn't get a chance last night). However, I ran the test again with the same overclocks and got 3448, which seems much more appropriate.
Reply
Reply
post #82 of 90
8/26/04 at 4:11pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Okle
well, if he has already done the benchmark chances are it's a bit too late to take a pic of the screen, mario... but i agree, you can easily photoshop a screenshot, so if you have a real pic of it, please post that instead. otherwise, mario will never be satisfied...
In 3dmark you can save a score to pull up later... so it's not THAT hard.
Reply
Reply
post #83 of 90
8/26/04 at 5:11pm
I have saved that score(a bunch of scores actually), but I can't figure out how to pull them up later. Anyone know how? Whenever I double click on the file I saved, I just get a message windows cannot open this file.
Reply
Reply
post #84 of 90
8/26/04 at 5:43pm
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by aliendude
I have saved that score(a bunch of scores actually), but I can't figure out how to pull them up later. Anyone know how? Whenever I double click on the file I saved, I just get a message windows cannot open this file.
In 3Dmark 03, just right click any of the box-area and it'll say load saved result.
Reply
Reply
post #85 of 90
8/26/04 at 6:07pm
Here are the pics of my very lucky fluke. I know they are a little fuzzy, but blame my 2.1 megapixel-peice-o-crap-camera.
LL
LL
LL
Reply
Reply
post #86 of 90
8/26/04 at 6:42pm
wow...that's one damn lucky fluke you got there!
Reply
Reply
post #87 of 90
8/26/04 at 7:45pm
thats very nice. but it seems your core is underclocked im sure mine came stock higher than 413.
Reply
Reply
post #88 of 90
8/26/04 at 8:21pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Devion
thats very nice. but it seems your core is underclocked im sure mine came stock higher than 413.
but you have a 9700...he is runinng a 9600, which is OCed by 62 MHz...
Reply
Reply
post #89 of 90
8/26/04 at 8:23pm
aliendude - do you have the breakdown for the 10K+ and the 3448 runs...I'd like to see those if you have them.
Reply
Reply
post #90 of 90
8/26/04 at 8:34pm
ahh didnt notice he was running 9600.
heehe post it for a laught!
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home