New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

3dmark 2005 LOL

post #1 of 20
9/27/04 at 1:28pm
Thread Starter 
well i think we mobility 9700 users can think in putting then has a museum with the launch of 3dmark 2005.. oh well we can allways admire a good looking slide show
Reply
Reply
post #2 of 20
9/27/04 at 5:55pm
That's always the case when they release a new one. Even desktop cards will choke on it. It's far ahead of the new games on purpose.
Reply
Reply
post #3 of 20
9/27/04 at 8:00pm
Maybe if running 3DMark05 is all you plan to do with your notebook. The ATI Mobility Radeon 9700 128MB runs all the latest games without any problems and that's what counts in my book
Reply
Reply
post #4 of 20
9/28/04 at 6:03am
Thread Starter 
ok but it sucks, such good notebooks that can not run 3d mark 2005..
Reply
Reply
post #5 of 20
9/28/04 at 11:17am
3DMark 2003 didn't run well on *anything* when it came out, either. What would be the point of not including state of the art technology in a benchmark program that has to last for 2 years? Most of the current graphics card aren't supposed to be able to handle the new version well. If you just want to enjoy the scenery, they usually have a demo (video) included
Reply
Reply
post #6 of 20
9/29/04 at 11:03am
First install Bittorrent:
http://bittorrent.com/download.html

And get the 3DMark05 bittorrent file from here (Download Mirror #3 - (BitTorrent)):
http://downloads.guru3d.com/download.php?det=874

The more that do this, the faster everyone will get to download 3DMark05 that's now out
Reply
Reply
post #7 of 20
9/29/04 at 2:00pm
1482 3DMarks & 2876 CPU Score on my first try (not very smooth)
Reply
Reply
post #8 of 20
9/29/04 at 3:29pm
Hehehe, 1454 3dMarks & 3268 CPU score. Man, that really does bitch spank us doesn't it snorre? I think i maxed at 11 FPS at one point! w00t! :-)
Reply
Reply
post #9 of 20
9/29/04 at 5:15pm
Not bad. Pentium M's seem to get much lower results. But let's wait for the first results from a Dell 9100/XPS with Mobility Radeon 9800.
Reply
Reply
post #10 of 20
9/29/04 at 5:22pm
3dmark 05 seems to require a lot of VRAM, no surprise. 64 MB cards choke up and end up below 1000 limit. 128 MB cards will only make above that. 256 MB MR 9800 is probably quite strong here.
Reply
Reply
post #11 of 20
9/29/04 at 6:07pm
Well, here's my first run with the XPS and mr9800. 2684 3Dmarks
Still somewhat a slideshow though. Averaging about 12 fps
Reply
Reply
post #12 of 20
9/29/04 at 7:22pm
Thread Starter 
any cl56 benchmark ?? mine is gone to fix
Reply
Reply
post #13 of 20
9/29/04 at 7:41pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by RC30
2684 3Dmarks
DAMN.
Reply
Reply
post #14 of 20
9/29/04 at 7:52pm
http://www.techreport.com/etc/2004q3...5/index.x?pg=1


For reference
Reply
Reply
post #15 of 20
9/29/04 at 7:56pm
dling
Reply
Reply
post #16 of 20
9/30/04 at 1:56am
A massive 882 for me. But at least the Asus looks pretty.



Steve
Reply
Reply
post #17 of 20
9/30/04 at 7:47pm
No more scores? Come on people!
Reply
Reply
post #18 of 20
9/30/04 at 8:16pm
A 3DMark05 score thread alreadys exists at

http://notebookforums.com/showthread.php?t=43398
Reply
Reply
post #19 of 20
10/1/04 at 6:55am
Thread Starter 
I've gotten 1118 on my cl56 ! i tought it would give 700... lol
Reply
Reply
post #20 of 20
10/1/04 at 7:49am
867 3d Mark / 2101 CPU.

Looks like 64Meg is a tight bottleneck...

------------------------------------
Asus W1N
WSXGA+ Screen (1680x1050)
1.7GHz Banias
1024 Meg DDR
Mobility Radeon 9600 64 Meg
80 Gig 5400rpm
XP Pro SP2
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Notebook Forums - General