NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Other Brand/Manufacturers › Other Brand Notebook Reviews › The Official 3DMark05 Score Laptop Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The Official 3DMark05 Score Laptop Thread - Page 2

post #21 of 33
Falcon-NW Fragbook TL (CL 56)
2.0 Dothan
1G Corsair
ATI m9700

1113
post #22 of 33
Hehehe, 1454 3dMarks & 3268 CPU score. Man, that really does bitch spank us doesn't it snorre? I think i maxed at 11 FPS at one point! w00t! :-)
__________________
Acer Ferrari 3200 stock (for now)

3dMark01: 12097
3dMark03: 3580 (CPU 681)
3dMark05: 1454 (CPU 3268)
post #23 of 33
1212, with a max of 9FPS!
post #24 of 33
strange...

your guys' notebooks are getting higher scores than my desktop. Right now I'm running:

2.6 GHz 800FSB P4
1.5 GB PC3200 (non dual channel)
FX5900XT

and I got 956 on my first try

not satisfied, I overclocked my FX5900 to 485 MHz core, 871 MHz RAM (originally 390/700) and I got 1178. I don't have a big enough power suppy to run it like that though haha...had to lower it a bit.
post #25 of 33
perhaps most of you will not know my system. I have a Quaddra DTS Pro made by Rock. www.rockdirect.com www.rockforum.com
my system is 3GHz 800FSB, 1GB DDR400, MR9600Pro, 80GB HDD (5400), 17" Screen (1440x900)

my 3DMark2k5 score is 1329 first try with the latest Omega drivers. I overclocked the GPU from 350/249 to 420/270, all the 3DMark settings were left to default and all the omega driver options were left to default.
for the unbelievers i have a screen capture of my score which i will be happy to post here if someone tells me how.
post #26 of 33
SergesPlace, you can't even get through the benchmarks? Does anyone else have this problem with the Asus M6BNE, or is this something only serge is having trouble with. I was planning on buying an M6BNE but if the fact that it's GPU only has 64 megs of vram keeps it from being up to par or running today's 3d aps properly then I dont know.
post #27 of 33

Hm

3DMark05 654 max
It sux
Need a better drivers or what ?
post #28 of 33

After few posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by edwingarath
perhaps most of you will not know my system. I have a Quaddra DTS Pro made by Rock. www.rockdirect.com www.rockforum.com
my system is 3GHz 800FSB, 1GB DDR400, MR9600Pro, 80GB HDD (5400), 17" Screen (1440x900)

my 3DMark2k5 score is 1329 first try with the latest Omega drivers. I overclocked the GPU from 350/249 to 420/270, all the 3DMark settings were left to default and all the omega driver options were left to default.
for the unbelievers i have a screen capture of my score which i will be happy to post here if someone tells me how.
You will be able manage some attachments
Just like i did below
post #29 of 33
Tweaked my system a bit. Pretty good scores. See my sig.
post #30 of 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chanke4252
SergesPlace, you can't even get through the benchmarks? Does anyone else have this problem with the Asus M6BNE, or is this something only serge is having trouble with. I was planning on buying an M6BNE but if the fact that it's GPU only has 64 megs of vram keeps it from being up to par or running today's 3d aps properly then I dont know.
On my Asus M6 with the latest Asus video driver 3D05 runs without incident,abeit slowly - I got 882 with a 2539 CPU score.

Cheers

Steve
post #31 of 33
1012 3dmark 05 on my Emachine M6810 with a Ati Mobility 9600 Pro and an Athlon 64 3200+
post #32 of 33
my scores in my sig.....
post #33 of 33
For 3dmark2003

3DMark Score2664 3DMarks
CPU Score708 CPUMarks

Comparing it to similar computers with the same gfx card (ATI Mobility Radeon 9700 128 MB), I wonder why my score is so low in comparison to all of yours...
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Other Brand Notebook Reviews
NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Other Brand/Manufacturers › Other Brand Notebook Reviews › The Official 3DMark05 Score Laptop Thread