NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Alienware Notebook Forums › Alienware General › Anyone have a 3D Mark 05 score yet?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Anyone have a 3D Mark 05 score yet? - Page 11

post #201 of 230
I remember when I had one of the top 05 scores here..heh.
post #202 of 230
I got a 3990 out of my 7700m
59.1 fps on doom3
post #203 of 230
siggy
post #204 of 230
Resurrection of the dead..
post #205 of 230
I get 8983 in 3DMark05


http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1033307


This is a desktop though with one 7800GTX and a 3000+ A64 Venice core clocked at 2.6 24/7 and 2 gigs of OCZ performance series ram. Cost me about $1700 to build it. Also has a raptor hard drive.
post #206 of 230
Quote:
Originally Posted by EVIL-SCOTSMAN
I got same board as you and all my mem slots are full and running at 400mhz, so i should see no reason why yours isnt, i dont c why it would have anything to do with the cpu, motherboard maybe, but as we both got same board and mines is running at 400 then i would presume yours should be able to do so as aswell, I am just surmising, i cudnt really say what the fx57 can and cannot do, but it would be kinda stupid for it not to be able to run all banks at full speed

If you have an A64 then you are a liar or are misinformed. The memory controller on the A64's can not and will not currently support 4 sticks at a full 400mhz. On an intel system if you run a divider you get a huge performance hit but with A64's there is no performance hit.
post #207 of 230
dude, u want proof ?

look at my earlier posts showing that indeed the x2 from amd can get 400mhz with 4 512mb sticks.

so stfu with your lieing bullshit.

on the AMD 64 Dualcore, it is possible to get 400mhz with 4 sticks, many people on these boards have them, although the normal amd64 can only get 333mhz.

hunt threw my earlier posts and you will indeed find proof by me and ewolff, cpuz results screenies, showing latency and 200mhz x2 = 400mhz, and all done with 4 sticks of ram.

so it is YOU who is misinformed.

if you look at the post from demon barber, even he says its now at 400mhz, and he isnt even using a dualcore cpu, he just using the amd64 fx57, so dude, you certainly didnt read the thread did you.

I have amd 64 3000 at 333 cuz motherboard dont support 2 slots full at 400mhz, its a msi k8m neo-v mobo, and a amd64 x2 at 400mhz. so please do your homework and READ the thread properly before being the smart one.

In conclusion, certain flavours of amd64 can attain 400mhz without any problems whatsoever. the stock amd64 cannot and will get 333 at its highest without tweaking.
post #208 of 230
Quote:
Originally Posted by prostreetcamaro
If you have an A64 then you are a liar or are misinformed. The memory controller on the A64's can not and will not currently support 4 sticks at a full 400mhz. On an intel system if you run a divider you get a huge performance hit but with A64's there is no performance hit.

The memory controller is integrated into the processor. The older cores can only run at 333 with all four slots populated unless you overclock. This is how my 3500+ that came with my Alienware is. AMD fixed this problem on the San Deigo core. Any San Diego based processor and all X2 dual core processors support all four sticks at 400mhz. I am running 2gb (4x512mb) and I am running at 400mhz.

Check my post in my photo gallery thread from when I upgraded

http://www.notebookforums.com/showpo...&postcount=162

You will notice on the CPUz info screen for the 3500+ that indeed the memory runs at 333 without overclocking the FSB. If you look at the CPUz for my 3800+, you will see that the FSB and the Memory are both running at 400.
post #209 of 230
cheers wolffie. i couldnt find our posts of the cpuz screenies.

but then again, we could be liars

cheers for setting things straight

rep inbound when i regen
post #210 of 230

3Dmark05

Hello.
I got 13796 on 3Dmark05 with my desktop: I am really anxious to see how a laptop with the 7800gtx go will do!

My Desktop:
AMD 64 X2 3800+ @ 2.7Ghz
DFI Lanparty UT NF4 SLI-D
1G 2X512 Mushkin Redline 4000xp Ram (+60mhz at 2 2 2 5)
2X 256mb 7800GTX in SLI w/ gpu at 490mhz ram at 1.39Ghz
Creative Labs Xfi -Fatal1ty sound card
2X 250G 7200 SATA HDD - (no raid >_<)
cpu is watercooled by koolance, and vga's will soon be too

I just want to break 14k ^_^ maybe with watercooling on the vga's I can!


--Kitty
post #211 of 230
Quote:
Originally Posted by a1i3nw4r3
Hello.
I got 13796 on 3Dmark05 with my desktop: I am really anxious to see how a laptop with the 7800gtx go will do!

My Desktop:
AMD 64 X2 3800+ @ 2.7Ghz
DFI Lanparty UT NF4 SLI-D
1G 2X512 Mushkin Redline 4000xp Ram (+60mhz at 2 2 2 5)
2X 256mb 7800GTX in SLI w/ gpu at 490mhz ram at 1.39Ghz
Creative Labs Xfi -Fatal1ty sound card
2X 250G 7200 SATA HDD - (no raid >_<)
cpu is watercooled by koolance, and vga's will soon be too

I just want to break 14k ^_^ maybe with watercooling on the vga's I can!


--Kitty
I have SLI 7800's and can get about 11220 with mine. How did you get yours so high?
post #212 of 230
he overclocked his cpu. his cpu is at 2.7, instead of 2.0.

so dont worry about it tate, if you were to overclock that much you would get about 15000. same with me, id probably get 14500-15000k aswell, if i bumped up my cpu by 700mhz.

most ive had without overclocking the cpu is 12100 something, but that was with OCd vid cards, at stock i get 11700 min and about 11850-11900 max at stock.

i did wonder about his timings tho, but mushkin redline is leet, but i would of thought a 60mhz overclock to the memory would of made him have to relax the timings, as 2-2-2-5 is fast, i would of thought maybe he would have to relax to 2 or 2.5-3-3-6. or something similar.

also his watercooling helps his cpu to OC that much. whereas me n you just got air.
post #213 of 230
u guys with the sli rigs have to start overclocking more. people who do minor overclocks can easily hit 12000, and with vapos and pelts they are hitting 19000+ and now with those 7800gtx 512's 20,000 is atainable.
Oh and EX7 6541 stock
post #214 of 230
and what real people do you know with all that stuff ?

and why would we want to overclock that much for just a 3d 05 score when it doesnt correlate into a better gaming experience.

I get a higher score than a fx55, but a fx55 will pwn me at gaming, so the 3d05 score = shit

and since there is no game that slows my or other highend rigs down, what is the point of it, other than to say OMG i got 462384289471 3dmark05 score, i am leet.

and the majority of people here can get 12000 without over clocking.

and 20,000 isnt attainable without using nitrogen and all that crap and having the best of the best stuff and overclocking the shit out of it, so i seriously think that the majority of people wouldnt even bother using that. bother is a bad word, wouldnt entertain the thought would be more like it.
As people just dont have the money to do all that with brandnew top of the line kit and probably end up damaging something.

Its easy to do that if you are a reviewer website, as you get the kit for free, thus dont give 2 shits if it dies on ya.

Basically, i am saying you are wrong, there is no need to overclock highend rigs, as every single game plays perfect on most of the highend rigs that are on the AW nbf forum.

I get 8500k with 1 7800gtx stock, and 11700-12000 with 2 at stock, to get over 12000, i bumped the vid cards up a little, just so that i got past the 12100 mark. cpu was always set at 2.2 and fsb was always at 201 = stock.
without the new dualcore optimized drivers from nvidia stock for 2 78s was just over 10k and one 78 was 8000
When warranty's run out and your in the market for a new pc, then thats when most people will try and take the pc to another level, but until 3dmark scores transpires into real world terms, there is no need for it

also 2 7800gtx's 256mb pwn 1 7800gtx 512mb
post #215 of 230
Quote:
Originally Posted by chode messiah
u guys with the sli rigs have to start overclocking more. people who do minor overclocks can easily hit 12000, and with vapos and pelts they are hitting 19000+ and now with those 7800gtx 512's 20,000 is atainable.
Oh and EX7 6541 stock
And I suppose you have a link to an ORB entry that hits 20,000?
post #216 of 230
no, i wouldnt think he has. last i heard 17000k was highest. but that was a while back. so i couldnt say what the top is now.
post #217 of 230


post #218 of 230
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by chode messiah
u guys with the sli rigs have to start overclocking more. people who do minor overclocks can easily hit 12000, and with vapos and pelts they are hitting 19000+ and now with those 7800gtx 512's 20,000 is atainable.
Oh and EX7 6541 stock

What? My core temps are low, however I still can't OC to that level. All the H20 in the world can't help get a stable GPU past a certain ppint.
post #219 of 230
Quote:
Originally Posted by ewolff



LMFAO

nice OC wolffie.

is that with your new fx79 and 9800gtx quad sli 1gb cards ?

I envy you working for amd and nvidia and getting all the best kit
post #220 of 230
Quote:
Originally Posted by EVIL-SCOTSMAN
LMFAO

nice OC wolffie.

is that with your new fx79 and 9800gtx quad sli 1gb cards ?

I envy you working for amd and nvidia and getting all the best kit
Actually I did that on a P4 1.4ghz with 512mb of ram and a Geforce 4 MX 440.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Alienware General
NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Alienware Notebook Forums › Alienware General › Anyone have a 3D Mark 05 score yet?