Originally Posted by snorre
Based on the Sonoma reviews I've seen so far, the low-power Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ (1.8GHz, 800HTT) performs better than both the Pentium M 765 (2.0GHz, 533FSB) & Pentium M 770 (2.13GHz, 533FSB) with dual channel DDR2-533 memory, so I'm not at all impressed with the performance of this new platform from Intel.
I expect that the Turion 64 1.6GHz will perform almost identical with my low-power Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ (1.8GHz), and that the Turion 64 1.8GHz will perform identical to the low-power Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ (2.0GHz) and that the Turion 64 2.0GHz will be about 10% faster than these again. It seems that Intel will need to release a 2.2GHz Pentium M to be able to compete performance wise with the Turion 64 2.0GHz.
The Pentium M 765 is 2.0 GHz with the 400 MHz FSB.