2. Pre-order Information2.(i) What are the specifications and pros/ cons of these models?
In this section I will go through each system one by one, outlining the basic current configuration options and giving briefly the pros and cons of each model. Please feel free to create topics on these models if need be and we will all be happy to help out. Note also that these models have had different hardware options available in the past for configuration, these are not included. I will endevour to keep the configurations up-to-date.
__________________________________________________________
>>Inspiron 8600<<Basic Specs:CPU: Pentium M; 705 (@ 1.5GHz), 725 (@ 1.6GHz), 745 (@ 1.8GHz), 755 (@ 2.0GHz). Or Celeron M; 340 (@ 1.5GHz)
LCD: 15.4" WXGA (1280 x 800), 15.4" WSXGA (1680 x 1050) and 15.4" WUXGA (1920 x 1200).
Memory: PC2700 (333MHz) SO DIMMs, 2 user accessible slots, 2GB (2 x 1GB) maximum.
Hard Drive: 30, 40, 60, 80 or 100 GB @ 4200rpm. 60 GB @ 7200rpm. Standard laptop 2.5".
Media Device: 8x DVD-ROM, 24x/24x/24x CD-RW (8x DVD), 8x DVD+RW/+R,
Wireless Card: Intel PRO 2100 (802.11b), Intel PRO 2200 (802.11b/g), Dell 1350 (802.11b/g) or Dell 1450 (802.11a/b/g) internal (Intel card required for 'Centrino' branding).
Video/ Graphics Card: 32MB or 64MB nVIDIA GeForce FX Go5200, 128MB ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 Pro Turbo.
Dimensions:
Height: 38.6 mm (1.52")
Width: 361.2 mm (14.22")
Depth: 276.1 mm (10.79")
Weight: 2.96kg (6.9 lbs) using Travel module.
Pros:
-> Powerful, when that Pentium-M 755 (2.0GHz) is paired with the MR9600 they create quite a match. Second in overall firepower only to Dell's new flagship Inspiron XPS/ 9100 models.
-> Beautiful Ultrasharp Widescreen display, this is what all laptops should have. These screens not only offer better resolutions and more working room, they have better specs (response time, viewing angles, contrast ratio) than most of the regular aspect screens Dell uses in other models.
-> Battery life is impressive with that power, can stretch out between 4 and 5 hours on just the main battery.
Cons:
-> Because of the widescreen and other features is a bit more bulky than the average laptop. Particularly wide (obviously), can make it a little more challenging find a laptop bag than normal.
-> Has been plagued by small imperfections such as keyboard flex, chassis creak and 'mushy' trackstick buttons.
-> Recently revised to i8600c, this model now has no trackpoint, IRDA or many of the legacy ports that it once had. To some this is a positive if they were never used, but a lot find this a negative factor.
__________________________________________________________
>>Latitude D800<<Basic Specs:CPU: Pentium M 1.4GHz, 735 (@ 1.7GHz), 745 (@ 1.8GHz), 755 (@ 2.0GHz).
LCD: 15.4" WXGA (1280 x 800), 15.4" WSXGA (1680 x 1050) and 15.4" WUXGA (1920 x 1200).
Memory: PC2100 (266MHz) SO DIMMs, 2 user accessible slots, 2GB (2 x 1GB) maximum.
Hard Drive: 30, 60 or 80 GB @ 4200rpm. 40 or 60 GB @ 5400rpm. 60 GB @ 7200rpm. Standard laptop 2.5".
Media Device: 8x DVD-ROM, 24x/24x/24x CD-RW (8x DVD), 4x DVD+RW/+R, 8x DVD+RW/+R,
Wireless Card: Intel PRO 2100 (802.11b), Intel PRO 2200 (802.11b/g), Dell 1350 (802.11b/g) or Dell 1450 (802.11a/b/g) internal (Intel card required for 'Centrino' branding).
Video/ Graphics Card: 32MB or 64MB nVIDIA GeForce FX Go5200, 128MB nVIDIA GeForce FX Go5650.
Dimensions:
Height: 38.6 mm (1.52")
Width: 361.2 mm (14.22")
Depth: 276.1 mm (10.79")
Weight: 2.96kg (6.9 lbs) using Travel module.
Pros:
-> Fairly powerful, with a Pentium-M 755 (2.0GHz) and the FX5650 it is actually a fairly good gaming laptop as well. In fact the nVIDIA card will beat the MR9600 offered in the i8600 in OpenGL games, it unfortunately does lag behind in the newer DX9 based games though.
-> Beautiful Ultrasharp Widescreen display, this is what all laptops should have. These screens not only offer better resolutions and more working room, they have better specs (response time, viewing angles, contrast ratio) than most of the regular aspect screens Dell uses in other models.
-> Battery life is impressive with that power, can stretch out between 4 and 5 hours on just the main battery.
-> Has the Latitude signiture Silver trim and indented LCD cover, looks more professional and certainly more sexy than the Inspiron line with the blue trim.... well I suppose that is a matter of opinion.
Cons:
-> Because of the widescreen and other features is a bit more bulky than the average laptop. Particularly wide (obviously), can make it a little more challenging find a bag than normal.
-> It is a business model but does not offer a CAD graphics option (Quadro or FireGL based), a little unusual for such a laptop but no biggie I suppose, if you are looking for CAD go the M60.
-> Obviously is in general more expensive than the Inspiron line even configured similarly.
-> Has a "crippled" BIOS. As you can see it uses only 266MHz RAM compared to 333MHz on the i8600 and M60, despite using the same chipset. Fortunately this can be easily overcome by flashing it with the M60 BIOS.
__________________________________________________________
>>Precision Workstation M60<<Basic Specs:CPU: Pentium M 1.5GHz, 735 (@ 1.7GHz), 745 (@ 1.8GHz), 755 (@ 2.0GHz).
LCD: 15.4" WSXGA (1680 x 1050) and 15.4" WUXGA (1920 x 1200).
Memory: PC2700 (333MHz) SO DIMMs, 2 user accessible slots, 2GB (2 x 1GB) maximum.
Hard Drive: 40, 60 or 80 GB @ 5400rpm. 60 GB @ 7200rpm. Standard laptop 2.5".
Media Device: 8x DVD-ROM, 24x/24x/24x CD-RW (8x DVD), 4x DVD+RW/+R, 8x DVD+RW/+R,
Wireless Card: Intel PRO 2100 (802.11b), Intel PRO 2200 (802.11b/g), Dell 1350 (802.11b/g) or Dell 1450 (802.11a/b/g) internal (Intel card required for 'Centrino' branding).
Video/ Graphics Card: 128MB nVIDIA Quadro FX Go700, 128MB nVIDIA Quadro FX Go1000.
Dimensions:
Height: 38.6 mm (1.52")
Width: 361.2 mm (14.22")
Depth: 276.1 mm (10.79")
Weight: 2.96kg (6.9 lbs) using Travel module.
Pros:
-> Powerful. A Pentium-M 755 (2.0GHz) and the Quadro FX1000 make a formidable pairing that can tackle most any CAD based work. It is also a good gaming machine, which performs well in most new games at high settings. Comparable in that respect to the i8600, even if the strengths lie in different areas.
-> Beautiful Ultrasharp Widescreen display, this is what all laptops should have. These screens not only offer better resolutions and more working room, they have better specs (response time, viewing angles, contrast ratio) than most of the regular aspect screens Dell uses in other models.
-> Battery life is impressive with that power, can stretch out betwee 4 and 5 hours on just the main battery.
-> Has the sexy Silver trim and indented LCD cover, looks more professional and stylish than the blue trim on the Inspiron line.... a very smart looking laptop compared to some of the fugly widescreen ones out there (yes, I'm looking at you Toshiba).
Cons:
-> Because of the widescreen and other features is a bit more bulky than the average laptop. Particularly wide (obviously), can make it a little more challenging find a bag than normal.
-> Is a very expensive laptop compared to the similar Inspiron 8600 and Latitude D800, but that is expected because of the extras and of course the CAD based Quadro workstation Graphics cards.
-> Tends to get fairly hot when under heavy use, primarily due to the Quadro cards. Keep an eye out.
-> Not offered the WXGA (1280 x 800) LCD option as in the i8600, i9100, D800). Not a big issue but an annoyance for those who would rather the more comfortable of the three choices.
__________________________________________________________
2.(ii) WXGA, WSXGA or WUXGA?
This has to be probably the most asked question on this forum, what LCD should you choose. It is answered time and time again so I have included this section in the FAQ, although I know it won't do much good to stem the tide.
There is no "better" screen as such when it comes to choosing one. Each one theoretically has exactly the same Specifications, which are
Screen Size: 15.4 Inch Widescreen
Palette: 262'144 Colours
Response Time: 35ms typical
Contrast Ratio: 300:1
Brightness: 185 cd/m^2
Viewing Angles: 65 degrees left-right; 50 degrees up-down
So what is the difference then? Why is the WUXGA more expensive? The difference is that they each have a different native maximum resolution. This is where the choice comes in, no resolution is better than the other, it is all up to what you need and what your own personal preference is. The higher the resolution, the smaller that icons and text will appear on the display because there are more physical pixels covering the same physical space.
Small text and icons can be overcome on the WUXGA or WSXGA displays by increasing the DPI setting or text size, but this can often adversely affect some programs, cutting off windows or making them unusable. Hence this is why it is important to choose he screen that is right for you when you order. These renedies can also be found below.
WXGA:
This display has a resolution of 1280 x 800; this is the closest equivalent to the 1024 x 768 common desktop resolution. If you are mainly using the laptop for office work and web browsing, then this is the way to go, because it has a nice readable text size. Games will play fine too, but it is not capable of the higher in-game resolutions (like 1280 x 1024).

Thanks Xing for the shot, its appreciated. Thanks still to Striker333 as well for the previous WXGA shot.
WSXGA:
This LCD is capable of a maximum native resolution of 1680 x 1050. This is, In my own humble opinion, the best of both worlds. The text and icons are smaller than that on the WXGA, but are still quite readable. The display is capable of good resolutions in game such as 1280 x 1024 which is a commonly used game setting.

Thank-you to WScottCross for this great picture.
Now, provided below are two pictures taken by mojoRT, which compare the WXGA screen (left) to the WSXGA (right). You can clearly see the difference in text/ menu/ icon size and the amount that can fit on the screen... so hopefully it helps in your choice.

WUXGA:
The WUXGA manages to display an impressive 1920 x 1200 pixels. This screen is fantastic if you love a lot of extra space, or do a lot of photo editing. However a drawback is that at the regular DPI setting the text and icons are ridiculously small, so you better have good eyesight. This is a love it or hate it display, and there are quite a few lovers out there... but I have had one and found it to be more trouble than its worth, which is my personal preference. Note the following picture is with large icons.

Thank-you and kudos to AbSoluTc for providing this picture.
Now lastly, below is a direct comparison of WSXGA and WUXGA provided kindly by Michael (hksscom).


Now if you do want to change the size to be more readable on any of these, then you have three options:
1. Reduce the resolution: kind of defeats the purpose, but whatever floats your boat. To do so->
(i) Right-click desktop and select
Properties;
(ii) Go to the
Settings tab;
(iii) Adjust the Screen Resolution slider to your preference and Apply it.
Note: If you are wondering why everything now is not as crisp and clear and looks fuzzy, this is explained later on in the FAQ... kind of an incentive for you to read on
2. Increase the DPI setting: This blows up everything to a larger size, but has its drawbacks in that windows can be cut-off, etc. Here you go->
(i) Right-click desktop and select
Properties;
(ii) Go to the
Settings tab, and click
advanced;
(iii) Click the
General tab, and from the drop down box labelled
DPI Setting you can increase it.
3. Increase the Icon and text size only: This is the only one without potentially really irritating consequences, but does look weird. Have a try->
(i) Right-click desktop and select
Properties;
(ii) Go to the
Appearance tab;
(iii) To change text size, adjust it from the
Font Size drop box seen in this tab. To make icons bigger Click the
effects button and tick
Use large icons.
2.(iii) I have heard game performance is better with WXGA... is this true?
Rubbish, complete and total rubbish, there is so much misinformation about this. The WXGA
does not get better fps in games. Put simply, a WXGA and WSXGA running the same game at the same resolution (say 1024 x 768 for example), with all other specs being the same, will get essentially the exact same performance (plus or minus the usual variables).
However a game running at the WXGA
native resolution compared to a game running at the WSXGA
native resolution will get better framerates (obviously as there is less strain on the card, but on the positive side the WSXGA resolution will look a lot better).
The attraction of the WSXGA and WUXGA over the WXGA choice is the ability to use these higher resolutions in games, their extra desktop working space, and of course their better picture quality during some scaled applications due to a better pixel pitch. It comes at the cost (some would say), of these smaller text and icons, but not at the cost of performance using the same gaming resolution.
2.(iv)What video card should I choose?
Obviously, this depends upon what you want and the intended usage of your new notebook. Just briefly about each one:
Both Inspiron 8600 & Latitude D800
Choice of:
-> 32MB nVIDIA GeForceFX 5200 Go- If you will primarily use the laptop for internet, word processing, DVDs and so on but
not for gaming then this is the perfect choice. You do not need a more powerful video card to play DVDs smoothly, they will play just as well with this as with the 128MB card.
-> 64MB nVIDIA GeForceFX 5200 Go- Similar to above, but if you also plan on doing some light gaming, perhaps some older games or if you don't mind playing at lower details and such. This has the power to game but is not geared towards high framerates or detail, especially on new games. Perfect for the in-between user.
Inspiron 8600 option only
-> 128MB ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 PRO TURBO- This is for all around power on the laptop. This will give you the best gaming and other graphical application performance hence is the best choice for heavy gamers or those wanting to play the latest releases whilst on the road. This card is unecessary and a waste of money better spent on say a faster HD or more RAM if you are not a gamer.
Latitude D800 option only
-> 128MB nVIDIA GeForceFX 5650 Go- This is for all around power on the laptop. This will give you the best gaming and other graphical application performance hence is the best choice for heavy gamers or those wanting to play the latest releases whilst on the road. Not quite as fast as the MR9600PT in the i8600 but still quite good. This card is unecessary and a waste of money better spent on say a faster HD or more RAM if you are not a gamer.
Precision M60 options only
Choice of:
-> 128MB nVIDIA Quadro FX Go700- The Quadro brother of the Geforce FX 5650 as in the D800, this is geared towards CAD design and other such software uses. Nice amount of power and most would suffice with this card. Gaming wise is is also about on par with the FX5650, perhaps a little below.
-> 128MB nVIDIA Quadro FX Go1000- This is the most powerful nVIDIA based mobile solution that Dell currently offers, the Quadro equivalent of the Geforce FX 5700. As such for optimal performance in CAD and other such software this is the card of choice, as for gaming this is also quite a nice card to have up your sleeve... knocking on the door of the MR9600PT seen in the i8600.
Both of these cards in the M60, and indeed the M60 itself, are unecessary if you do not use this design and graphics software for either work or pleasure. The M60 is in fact pretty much the same as the D800 but for a few extra configuation options.... at a much more hefty price tag.
Back to
Table of Contents and Thread