hey if i order 2 60gig 7200rpm drives (which i am) will they come raided or is it an option or do i have to do it myself because i dont know much about hooking something like that up ive never raided anything before
NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Sager & Clevo Notebook Forums › Sager & Clevo Notebooks › raid question
Recent Reviews
-
So I just got a Lenovo Yoga 13. This is my review. As what I primarily do is writing and programming, having a good keyboard is critical for me, which is why a tablet alone can’t work for me, and...
-
I have owned dozens of laptops in a variety of brands, and had many different laptops provided for my use at work. Without question, this is the finest I have owned. The Alienware M17x R2 is a...
-
N/m
-
Lenovo Thinkpad W530 Review by Djembe One of the longest and most enduring brands in computers is Thinkpad. Originally developed by IBM in the USA, Thinkpad notebook computers are now...
-
I have this memory installed in my Inspiron 14R. 6gb (one 2gb & one 4gb). Great performance! I highly recommend Kingston.
raid question
post #2 of 15
8/6/03 at 2:07am
post #3 of 15
8/6/03 at 9:54am
- Joined: 11/2002
- Location: Florida
- Posts: 876
- Select All Posts By This User
post #4 of 15
8/6/03 at 11:10am
- Joined: 6/2003
- Location: Kitchener, Ontario Canada
- Posts: 34
- Select All Posts By This User
Raid doubling your storage?
My real question on raid is this...With Raid 0, you get your data essentially spit in 2... so it reads faster since it spreads it over 2 drives... great.. so does that mean that with 2 60 gig drives, I'm actually getting 120 gigs...
In raid 1, it would be 60 gigs, with the second drive just backing up/mirroring the first, but with raid 0, I should be getting 120 right?
Bob
post #5 of 15
8/6/03 at 11:17am
- Joined: 7/2003
- Location: Austin, TX
- Posts: 378
- Select All Posts By This User
For a RAID 0 stripped array you get:
- A drive that appears to have double the storage capacity of your SMALLEST drive in the array if you have a 40 GB and 60 GB drive in the array you'll have what appears to be an 80 GB drive and 20 GB of lost space.
- A drive that appears to be slightly slower than 2x your SLOWEST drive in the array.
In the configuration that the 8890 will be sold in if you get 2 60 GB drives with 8 MB cache and 7200 RPM spindle speed you'll have a 120 GB drive with 16 MB cache and a near 14400 spindle speed.
- A drive that appears to have double the storage capacity of your SMALLEST drive in the array if you have a 40 GB and 60 GB drive in the array you'll have what appears to be an 80 GB drive and 20 GB of lost space.
- A drive that appears to be slightly slower than 2x your SLOWEST drive in the array.
In the configuration that the 8890 will be sold in if you get 2 60 GB drives with 8 MB cache and 7200 RPM spindle speed you'll have a 120 GB drive with 16 MB cache and a near 14400 spindle speed.
post #6 of 15
8/6/03 at 11:18am
- bigboy9247
- 0
- Registered User
- offline
- Joined: 4/2003
- Location: rome ny
- Posts: 141
- Select All Posts By This User
post #8 of 15
8/6/03 at 4:19pm
- Joined: 11/2002
- Location: Florida
- Posts: 876
- Select All Posts By This User
Yes, it will "come with Raid 0" if that is what you're asking. It is a setting in the BIOS (more than likely) that you simply turn on. All 8890s will feature this.
You have it somewhat right, you'd have to 60Gig drives with 8MB cache each (effectively 16MB since data is split), but you would not effectively have a 14400 spindle speed, you'd have dual 7200RPM and the latency associated with it.
Its like was said in another thread, if you have dual 3Ghz procs in a PC, you do not have a 6Ghz PC you have a dual 3Ghz.
Quote:
| 2 60 GB drives with 8 MB cache and 7200 RPM spindle speed you'll have a 120 GB drive with 16 MB cache and a near 14400 spindle speed. |
Its like was said in another thread, if you have dual 3Ghz procs in a PC, you do not have a 6Ghz PC you have a dual 3Ghz.
post #9 of 15
8/6/03 at 4:25pm
Whether it comes setup or you have to do it yourself depends on the vendor. Some vendors will setup RAID and install the OS on it for you, others won't, I'm sure.
Ayasin was completely correct about the aspects of RAID 0. With hardware RAID-0, such as supported by the 8890, operation is completely transparent to software, the software only sees one large, high-speed disk. So installing the OS on it is no propblem.
The equivalent statistics to what Ayasin gave, but for RAID-1:
- A drive that appears to have the same capacity as the smallest drive in the array. So if you have a 40 GB and a 60 GB drive in the array, you'll have what appears to be a 40 GB drive and 20 GB of lost space. (That 40 GB is mirrored, so occupies another 40 GB, bringing the total to 100, the combined capacity of the drives).
- A drive that, on writing, appears slightly slower than the slowest drive in the array.
- A drive that, on reading, appears slightly slower than the fastest drive in the array. (Assuming the controller is smart enough to pull the fastest copy. RAID-1 has no way to determine which copy contains errors in case of discrepancy, so there's no reason to compare the data to what's on the slower drive).
If you use two identical drives, a RAID-1 configuration looks to software like a single one of those drives.
-phubar
Ayasin was completely correct about the aspects of RAID 0. With hardware RAID-0, such as supported by the 8890, operation is completely transparent to software, the software only sees one large, high-speed disk. So installing the OS on it is no propblem.
The equivalent statistics to what Ayasin gave, but for RAID-1:
- A drive that appears to have the same capacity as the smallest drive in the array. So if you have a 40 GB and a 60 GB drive in the array, you'll have what appears to be a 40 GB drive and 20 GB of lost space. (That 40 GB is mirrored, so occupies another 40 GB, bringing the total to 100, the combined capacity of the drives).
- A drive that, on writing, appears slightly slower than the slowest drive in the array.
- A drive that, on reading, appears slightly slower than the fastest drive in the array. (Assuming the controller is smart enough to pull the fastest copy. RAID-1 has no way to determine which copy contains errors in case of discrepancy, so there's no reason to compare the data to what's on the slower drive).
If you use two identical drives, a RAID-1 configuration looks to software like a single one of those drives.
-phubar
post #10 of 15
8/6/03 at 4:57pm
So if you had 2 drives with RAID 1 you could remove one and still function correct? cause you'd be removing the backup copy drive.
But with Raid 0, if you removed one drive, all hell breaks loose cause you just removed 1/2 of the data for every program and application you have ever installed. Damn.
All in all, this RAID stuff sounds pretty cool
But with Raid 0, if you removed one drive, all hell breaks loose cause you just removed 1/2 of the data for every program and application you have ever installed. Damn.
All in all, this RAID stuff sounds pretty cool

post #11 of 15
8/6/03 at 8:21pm
Exactly. In fact, with RAID-1, you should be able to remove one drive and replace it with a blank one, and the RAID controller will copy the entire other drive over to the new blank disk to make a mirrored copy. It's a quick way to make disk copies.
Raid 0, if either drive goes away, you're left with half your data. In fact, you're left with every other unit of data (probably every other sector), so the entire disk is useless gibberish.
-phubar
Raid 0, if either drive goes away, you're left with half your data. In fact, you're left with every other unit of data (probably every other sector), so the entire disk is useless gibberish.
-phubar
post #12 of 15
8/6/03 at 9:29pm
Raid
0 AKA disk striping requires 2 drives
pros: speed cons: not fault tolerant
1 AKA disk mirroring requires 2 drives
pros: fault tolerant cons: no speed increase
5 AKA disk striping with parity 3 drives
pros: fault tolerant, speed increase cons: need 3 drives!
If a RAID 0 fails your screwed you can't recover you data
If a RAID 1 fails you switch to the other disk and put in a new drive and the RAID controller mirrors the working drive to the blank one
If one disk of a RAID 5 fails you can still work with 2 disks as the RAID controller and rebuild the data from the parity and remaining data, at reduced performance of course. Each drive contains data and parity information. After replacing the bad disk the RAID controller will rebuild the failed drive.
RAID 0+1 is popular because the controller doesn't have to calculate and write the parity information, so there is speed increase. If one drive fails you have a mirror back-up of it.
If the 8890 has a hardware RAID controller as opposed to using Windows software for RAID. The speed increase will be realized. I haven't been following the specs on the 8890, hence my ignorance.
0 AKA disk striping requires 2 drives
pros: speed cons: not fault tolerant
1 AKA disk mirroring requires 2 drives
pros: fault tolerant cons: no speed increase
5 AKA disk striping with parity 3 drives
pros: fault tolerant, speed increase cons: need 3 drives!
If a RAID 0 fails your screwed you can't recover you data
If a RAID 1 fails you switch to the other disk and put in a new drive and the RAID controller mirrors the working drive to the blank one
If one disk of a RAID 5 fails you can still work with 2 disks as the RAID controller and rebuild the data from the parity and remaining data, at reduced performance of course. Each drive contains data and parity information. After replacing the bad disk the RAID controller will rebuild the failed drive.
RAID 0+1 is popular because the controller doesn't have to calculate and write the parity information, so there is speed increase. If one drive fails you have a mirror back-up of it.
If the 8890 has a hardware RAID controller as opposed to using Windows software for RAID. The speed increase will be realized. I haven't been following the specs on the 8890, hence my ignorance.
post #13 of 15
5/3/06 at 11:24pm
post #14 of 15
5/4/06 at 6:26am
BigBoy, if you are planning on installing your own OS and setting up a RAID 0 yourself you should know it can be a litle tricky. I recommend doing a search on these forums about it.
Basically, you have to install the RAID drivers from a floopy. Since most laptops don't come with an internal flaoppy drive anymore you'll need to make sure you get an external version and that it is enabled in your bios. Again, there is detailed information about this elsewhere in the forums.
Lastly, if you are planning on using RAID 0 on your lappy I strongly recommend weekly back-ups to a large external hard drive. Laptop drives are slightly more prone to failure than desktop models, a tendancy made even worse by the abuse that laptops endure. Since you have two hard drives you now have twice the chance that *one* of them will fail, scuttling *all* your data.
Basically, you have to install the RAID drivers from a floopy. Since most laptops don't come with an internal flaoppy drive anymore you'll need to make sure you get an external version and that it is enabled in your bios. Again, there is detailed information about this elsewhere in the forums.
Lastly, if you are planning on using RAID 0 on your lappy I strongly recommend weekly back-ups to a large external hard drive. Laptop drives are slightly more prone to failure than desktop models, a tendancy made even worse by the abuse that laptops endure. Since you have two hard drives you now have twice the chance that *one* of them will fail, scuttling *all* your data.
post #15 of 15
5/4/06 at 6:31am
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by 76TR6
I've been using only one H.D. and had to send my 9890 back for repair and got them to install another H.D. so I could use Raid 1 configuration. What do I need to do to get it going?
76TR6 |
Return Home
Back to Forum: Sager & Clevo Notebooks
- raid question
NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Sager & Clevo Notebook Forums › Sager & Clevo Notebooks › raid question
Currently, there are 212 Active Users
(3 Members and 209 Guests)
Recent Discussions
- › acer aspire one problem 4 hours, 28 minutes ago
- › Where minds meet 6 hours, 36 minutes ago
- › Cool (maybe) and Free Android Apps 6 hours, 37 minutes ago
- › Cool (at times "Free") iOS apps 6 hours, 38 minutes ago
- › Google Chrome: Open Source Web Browser 6 hours, 42 minutes ago
- › distorted image in IE 7 hours, 13 minutes ago
- › Is the popular trackpad problem of Lenovo Ideapad Y500 solved or not? 14 hours, 16 minutes ago
- › Gateway Solo 9300 upgrade? 16 hours, 13 minutes ago
- › Latitude D800 freezes after about four minutes after taking out of... 17 hours, 51 minutes ago
- › DIAMOND WR300NSI 300Mbps 802.11n Wireless Repeater Range Extender 1 day, 3 hours ago
View: New Posts | All Discussions
Recent Reviews
- › Lenovo Yoga 13 IdeaPad Convertbale Ultrabook (tablet) 13.3"... by The Bard sRc
- › Alienware M18X by MrFox
- › Kensington Black Contour Pro 17" Notebook Carrying Case Model... by great white
- › Lenovo W530-24382LU i7-3720QM 2.60GHz 4GB 500GB 7200rpm NVIDIA... by Djembe
- › Kingston 8GB (2 x 4GB) 204-Pin DDR3 SO-DIMM DDR3 1333 Laptop Memory by Nicadraus
- › Synology DiskStation 1-Bay (Diskless) Network Attached Storage... by Mr T
- › Barnes & Noble Nook Color by sewshoplady
- › Cooler Master CM Storm Spawn 3500 DPI Optical Sensor Gaming Mouse... by Rotterdamblues
- › Samsung MV-3T4G4 4GB DDR3 Laptop SDRAM (1333MHz PC3-10600) by Rotterdamblues
- › Alienware Aurora m9700 by amythompson172
View: More Reviews
New Articles
- › Intel Summer 2012 SSD Scavenger Hunt - Full... by ranjanis
- › Intel's Maple Crest 330 Series Promotion... by ranjanis
- › Intel Cherryville SSD Spring 2012 Giveaway by ranjanis
- › Intel Cherryville SSD Giveaway 2012 - Terms... by ranjanis
- › Advertise by jdz2287
- › Search And Advanced Search Tutorial by NotebookForums
- › Tagging Tutorial by NotebookForums
- › Add A New Item Tutorial by NotebookForums
- › Image And Video Tutorial by NotebookForums
- › Subscription Tutorial by NotebookForums
View: New Articles | All Articles
Home | Reviews | Forums | Articles | My Profile
About NotebookForums.com | Join the Community | Advertise
© 2013 NotebookForums.com is powered by Huddler Tech | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map
About NotebookForums.com | Join the Community | Advertise
© 2013 NotebookForums.com is powered by Huddler Tech | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map





