My wife's 9200 WXGA+ arrived today. She likes it much better than the 8600 it's replacing.
On the left is the 8600 with Samsung WSXGA+.
In the center in the 9200 with Samsung WXGA+.
On the right is my 9200 with LG Philips WUXGA.
The 9200 WXGA+ appears to be one click brighter than the other two, has no noticeable anti-glare coating artifacts, and has nice coloration (I tried to tweak gamma correction to get the displays pretty close). Too bad it has the lowest rez of the three, but that's what wifey wanted....
BTW, I think the WUXGA grainyness is visibile in this shot. I'll post an individual shot of the WUXGA in another thread.
These pictures should also make the resolution differences obvious. The WUXGA can display 78% more information than the WXGA+, and 31% more than the WSXGA+.

On the left is the 8600 with Samsung WSXGA+.
In the center in the 9200 with Samsung WXGA+.
On the right is my 9200 with LG Philips WUXGA.
The 9200 WXGA+ appears to be one click brighter than the other two, has no noticeable anti-glare coating artifacts, and has nice coloration (I tried to tweak gamma correction to get the displays pretty close). Too bad it has the lowest rez of the three, but that's what wifey wanted....
BTW, I think the WUXGA grainyness is visibile in this shot. I'll post an individual shot of the WUXGA in another thread.
These pictures should also make the resolution differences obvious. The WUXGA can display 78% more information than the WXGA+, and 31% more than the WSXGA+.







Does the WXGA have the slightly darker area by the clock? Maybe im the only one that notices this but it drives me crazy sometimes 
