Quote:
|
Originally Posted by horatiub
...To be honest, I can' explain why is this, but those are the facts.
|
Makes sense. Copying the larger file exceeds the 16mb cache provided by the Toshiba drive, so your bottleneck becomes the drive's actual data throughput speed. The Hitachi is faster in this regard due to its faster spin rate.
The larger buffer on the toshiba drive means that you'd have a better 'hit rate' in the cache so the drive wouldn't have to physically pull data from the platters as much as the 8mb cache Hitachi. When the drives had to pull data from the platters, the Hitachi would be faster.
Real world performance would depend on how you use the computer. If you're accessing the same files over and over, and those files are smaller than 16mb, the Toshiba will perform well. If you're more random in your file usage, or if the files you access often are larger than 16mb, then the Hitachi will likely perform better.