Quote:
| Well, since we've gone to personal opinions, I guess I'll throw mine in as well. |
Other than a quote about the aesthetics of Thermaltake units, since when did i throw a personal opinion?
Quote:
| First off, I think both units are fine. They both cool equally as well (I don't consider a 1° to 5° difference to be that major. Well in a margin of error IMO). |
Why would you settle for second best when you can have the best for, as you say "Pretty even pricing"
Quote:
| Yes, the Tower112 is huge. It's massive. But, that's also part of it's charm. It looks freak'n cool in my case, and with two lighted fans on, it looks spectacular. As far as compatibility issues, I had less of an issue with the Tower112 then I did with the stock Intel air cooler. I had to bend the design plate on my Northbridge fan to fit the Intel heat sink/fan. But the Tower112 cleared it nicely. The actual footprint of the Tower112 is smaller than you'd think. |
If you think it looks nice, i would leave u to your opinion, but i have already mentioned the disadvantages of too much weight in my earlier post and you havent managed to counter that yet. Also, the Tower112 compounds the problem by having the centre of mass so much further away from the motherboard, applying much more torque on the motherboard as a leaver would. As for your problem with the stock cooler. If that NB sink was the standard HS/Fan on your motherboard, then the motherboard manufacturer was stupid and put out a defective design product as most of the users of the motherboard would have a stock intel heatsink/fan. If it's an aftermarket heatsink/fan then that's also a defective design. The stock intel cooler fits exactly in it's allocated space, marked by the 4 holes without overhanging the rest of the motherboard, but if your northbridge fan managed to get into the way, it's either a custom job you made (to which i have no comment) yourself by crazy gluing a fan to a passive sink or the sink ends up overhanging the CPU area which is incredibly stupid. Ive seen alot of aftermarket NB coolers in my day and they all have one thing in common. They have approximately the same footprint as the stock NB cooler they were supposed to replace, but most of them are much taller than the stock sink, meaning that if a CPU cooler were to be tall as well, spill out onto the area around the heatsink retention area and overhang the motherboard, that's when u will have problems.
If what you are saying about your stock sink not fitting, please snap a few pics for us.
The XP-90 has had no compatability issues with anything i have heard so far.
Quote:
| It doesn't 'blow it away'. Your opinion of it may make it seem that way, but I see them both on pretty even ground. As do a lot of reviewers. |
If you got the impression that it 'blows it away' then i leave you to your opinion because what i have stated in my earlier post is purely objective, outlining the faults of the Tower112 very clearly, in an objective way. If you drew that conclusion from my post, then sure, go ahead.
As for "a lot of reviewers", ive seen what, 3 reviews of it? (OCIA, ExtremeMHz and PCModding Mayalsia) The tone of the reviewer cannot be taken into account, only the cold hard facts that you get from each review, such as the specifications of the cooler, pictures and the performance testing as well as the method of testing to verify that these numbers are actually correct. Ive seen very few reviews which speak badly of a product, unless the product is so bad that it's not even worth looking at. Reviewers want to promote their site and if they speak badly of a product, they may lose the favor of the company supplying that product and not get any further products to review.
Quote:
| I'm not trying to argue about anything other than the Tower112. |
But thermaltake's previous reputation does not do it any favors either and obviously their trademark 'quality' has carried onto the Tower112 with it's crappy base.
Quote:
| And yes, If I went to any OC forums right now most would say the XP-90 is one of, if not the, best air cooler heat sink. But those sites are also notorious for jumping on one item and saying 'it's the best' and dogging everything else out. However, even the guys over at extremeoverclocking.com said the Tower112 was a good solution. |
How many 'guys' where there and post count? Anyway, i see alot of the forum boards i reguarly frequent are pretty open minded about things. Sure, they may draw a few opinions based on pre release pictures, but we base our conclusions on facts and they see a crappy cooler when they see one. Ive seen them reccomend alot of things such as the Hyper6, Zalman CNPS7700 coolers, Zalman CNPS7000, most thermalright products and a few coolermaster CPU heatsinks. They're all fine in my books for their day. Go post it up, there's no harm in doing so.
Quote:
| I'll say this. Show me someone getting much better cooling performance on their processor with an XP-90 than I am with my Tower112 (standard setup, no freaky nitrous oxide crap) on a Prescott and I'll be glad to say you are right. My largest drop in temps was about 25° under load. I'd bet if I put the second fan on the Tower112 I could get up to 30° drop in load temperature. And I have crappy cable management and extremely crappy airflow. |
At this level of air cooling, there isnt much room to go any further (WTF with the nitrous oxide crap? that stuff is used in cars for speed boosts, please stick to the topic in computer Air cooling), sure, if you compare a cheap $20 heatsink with an XP-90 or even the Tower112, there's going to be a huge temeprature difference in excess of 10 degrees celcius, but at this high end of air cooling, 1 to 5 degrees is already as good as you can get. If you can get a 5 degree difference from two high end coolers consistantly, then that's already in itself pretty awesome. Im not telling you to buy the XP-90 since you already have a high end cooler that you seem to like alot and protect with all your life, but im convincing other people reading this argument to get the XP-90 since, personal opinions aside on aesthetics, the XP-90 IS the better performer as well as being the safer heatsink. As you say, it's priced similarly so price is not an influence when deciding between these two. So again, why other than a liking of it's aesthetics and a desire to snap your motherboard in half or go play wrecking ball with your PC parts, why would you want a Tower112 when there's an XP-90?