ok, here's the deal. my mind is almost made up on the sager 5680. but then today i hear about the dell 8600. here r the pros and cons (for me) for each notebook when compared to each other.
dell 8600 pros: pentium m, and probably less noisy, lighter and cooler than the 5680. dell brand name vs less known sager. battery life.
cons: absolutely hate 16:9 screens (in general). dvd+r format not supported by my dvd player.
sager pros: regular 4:3 lcd, dvd-r format, processor is fast.
cons: heard they get pretty toasty and noisy. no battery life. a bit heavy and big. sager less known.
video cards r about the same so not an issue. i would be plugged in mostly but would need a few hrs battery life occasionally. would mostly use it for gaming (want it to at least run doom 3 at minimum setting), digital editing, internet, and work which will not be too taxing on the processor.
would like to get some opinions. thanks


dell 8600 pros: pentium m, and probably less noisy, lighter and cooler than the 5680. dell brand name vs less known sager. battery life.
cons: absolutely hate 16:9 screens (in general). dvd+r format not supported by my dvd player.
sager pros: regular 4:3 lcd, dvd-r format, processor is fast.
cons: heard they get pretty toasty and noisy. no battery life. a bit heavy and big. sager less known.
video cards r about the same so not an issue. i would be plugged in mostly but would need a few hrs battery life occasionally. would mostly use it for gaming (want it to at least run doom 3 at minimum setting), digital editing, internet, and work which will not be too taxing on the processor.
would like to get some opinions. thanks









....anyway the 8890 features hyperthreading which will improve cpu utilization...especially if u do a lot of digital editing/photoshop stuff, not sure if the dell machine will have this. so basically i think it boils down to how much u r willing to spend...and which features u think u will need.



