Why do you guys all insist on using 3dmark03.
this is by far one of the most biased benchmarkers to date and extremely optimzed for nvidia... my suggestion, stick with 2001 gave more accurate results when compairing cards. but then again...if you wana test all the fancy dx9 stuff guess you gotta use 03 ne?
yes I believe you need 03 for the dx9 stuff which is important for our awesome m10 chip Right now I have it running extremly smooth using powerstrip and overclocking the graphics...Im not gonna go too crazy but I have it overclocked to 400 from the core of 350...score is 3250 right now and Ive run 3dmark03 for an hour straight with no anomalies or crashes...
yep try the mem at 300, it should run stable... if you get any glitchs in the benchmark or anomolies just downclock. The desktop cards can oc to 460-500 core but sure the lappys cant go that high but how high
ok ill do that now...im currently dloading the omega drivers as another member said in another post it works great with his m10...any caveats with those drivers? Is it worth it? Of course I set up a restore point first...
Direwolf...it wasnt stable at 300...lowered it to 290 tested it with screen tearing...now it seems fine at 280...did like 5 3dmark03 tests with no anomalies...score was 3350 not bad...havent installed omega drivers yet as Im still having fun playing with overclocking this bad boy This is kinda like getting a pit bull and giving him steroids lol
well if your hardcore you could up the core farther, to find out its limit the benchmark will freeze. Not like you need to go that high. If I was you I would keep it 15 below where it freezes if you do try to up the core to the max lol