i think klattu missed all the benchmarks where the dell beats the clevo clones.
post #21 of 100
3/1/05 at 7:57pm
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
|
Originally Posted by chile62
- actually it does have a 60GB 7200 rpm drive option
- how could you have raid 0 with one drive? - did you see on the Tom's Hardware where it smoked the equivalent of the AW7700 and Sager9860? basically it's got the AW7700 and Sager 9860 beat on size, weight, performance and battery life/heat. Why would you bash it just because it's a Dell, the numbers don't lie. I think Clevo should just follow the lead and start putting mobile processors on machines with high end cards so you can get less weight/bulk with better performance and battery life. Isn't this what people want? gaming notebooks with actual battery life and kick ass graphics cards? I'm just surprised Dell is leading the pack on this issue, just wait til Clevo jumps on the wagon then AW and Sager can make similar kickass "mobile" notebooks! mobile processors + high end graphics = kickass "laptop" gaming! the XPS2 is a good start and long overdue from any computer company |
|
Originally Posted by chile62
about the raid 0, i was responding to Klattu saying that the XPS2 doesn't have raid 0(it can't because it's single HD)
actually they compared it to the Sager 9860 and same version Hypersonic model with the 6800 Go, so these are exactly the the same as the 7700. but isn't anyone else excited someone finally paired a kickass mobile cpu with a gaming card? now if they can only do that in a 6 pound 15" model...that would be ultimate portable gaming! |

I accept that I was not only unfair, but wrong. As benchmarks are the way judge systems, I have to accept that the XPS 2 is impressive. Per Tom's Hardware and AnandTech the Pre-Production XPS Gen 2 has awesome benchmarks (and no I had not seen them.) That is why I will eat my words. I don't know as much as I should have about the Alviso chip set, I guess it is time to do so. I do have great faith in the RAID-0 & Quality RAM, such enhancements would only make the XPS 2 better rig. But whatever.|
Originally Posted by chile62
...and because the AW has glowing alien eyes it gets an extra 10fps!!
![]() when AW and Sager come up with similar machines then you'll be raving about that, it's the fanboy in you. and yes weight does matter, if it didn't why not strap a desktop on your back? It seems that laptop makers are still figuring out a good weight/portability to performance balance and that new Dell seems pretty good, if it came in a 15" model and shaved off a couple more pounds it'd be even better. Don't knock it just because it's not alienware though, if AW came out with the exact same machine as the XPS2 you'd be singing a different tune. |
|
Originally Posted by Klattu
Note to TylerDurden,
According to the dell website, the 100 gig HD in the XPS Gen 2 isn't even a 5200, it is even worse than that, 4200. They could never get close to those bench marks with the 100 gig hd. Phase 7? If you haven't heard it 100 times, this baby is worth the wait. It sucks, but it is so worth it. My girlfriend is absolutely sick and jealious of all the time and fun Gort (My 7700) and I have. I hope you get it soon. Klattu |

|
Originally Posted by TylerDurden
Wow a 4200RPM hu? Holy crap batman; that’s slow! Nice catch Klattu. I'm in phase 7 with my Area-51 7700. I was considering canceling my order and going with the XPS2 strictly based off of the bench marks it has produced. However, when I took a step back and looked past the benchmarks; in the long run I feel the 7700 will be better. Better in terms of performance, and better in terms of overall upgradeability. Not to mention the extra features you can get with the 7700.
My 7700 has been configured as follows: [1] Area-51m 7700 Warranty: 1-Year AlienCare Toll-Free 24/7 Phone Support with Onsite Service Operating System: Microsoft® Windows® XP Home Edition with Service Pack 2 AlienRespawn: Alienware® Respawn Recovery Kit Case: Area-51m 7700 Case with 17" WideSXGA+ 1680 x 1050 LCD Display with Built-in Camera - Xeno Grey Processor: Intel® Pentium® 4 Processor 560J w/ HT Technology 3.6GHz 1MB Cache Motherboard: Intel® 915P Chipset Supporting PCI-Express Memory: 2GB Dual Channel DDR2 SO-DIMM at 533MHz - 4 x 512MB Video Card: Area-51m 7700 X800 with 256MB of DDR3 memory Sound Card: Intel® High-Definition Audio (24-bit, 192Khz) with 7.1 surround sound Hard Drive: Extreme Performance - RAID 0 - 120GB (60GB x 2) 7200 RPM ATA100 - Hitachi Optical Drive One: 8X Dual Layer DVD+/-RW / 24X CD-RW Combo w/Software Optical Drive Two: 24x10x24 CD-RW / 8X DVD Combo w/Software MPEG2 Decoder Floppy Drive: USB Floppy Drive Ethernet NIC: Integrated 10/1000Mb Gigabit Ethernet NIC Modem: 56K Modem with V.92 Technology Optional Display: No Monitor Free Alienware T-Shirt: Free Alienware® T-Shirt - White Desktop Enhancements: Exclusive AlienGUIse Theme Manager Free Alienware Mousepad: Free Alienware® Mousepad Automated Support: AlienAutopsy: Automated Technical Support Request System If the Dell XPS2 could offer just a few more of the additional features that the 7700 has to offer then without a doubt I’d probably go with the Dell. Performance wise though I really don’t feel like the Dell is that much greater then the 7700. I don’t really trust benchmarks; especially from Tom’s. ![]() |
|
Originally Posted by TylerDurden
AW will be coming out with something similar if not better. AW in the long run will be better then the XPS2. The XPS2 will be outdated (and pretty much already is) faster then the AW one. The AW offers Raid options, 7200 RPM HD's and Corsair RAM; in either 512 X 4 or 1024 X 2 flavors.
|
|
Originally Posted by tomgreen
I worry more about the 7700 being outdated. I just think the concept of really big-ass desktop replacement notebooks using desktop components is quickly becoming less interesting (it is to me for pro audio, but not much else). Unless you specifically need multiple drives and such, I think a lot of people are going to make whatever compromises to get real battery life and lighter weight.
|
|
Originally Posted by Joelist
Hi Tyler,
In fairness to Dell, they will allow you to configure it with the 60 GB 7200rpm HDD, what they cannot do is a RAID 0 config because they do not have two HDD mounts. Also, awesome 7700 you have coming. When you get it, would you run 3DMark and post the scores? That would answer a lot. Joelist |
|
Originally Posted by tomgreen
I worry more about the 7700 being outdated. I just think the concept of really big-ass desktop replacement notebooks using desktop components is quickly becoming less interesting (it is to me for pro audio, but not much else). Unless you specifically need multiple drives and such, I think a lot of people are going to make whatever compromises to get real battery life and lighter weight.
|
|
Originally Posted by ethanweku
thank you guys for the great inputs, i almost changed my order to the dell xps gen 2, because of the portability factor, decent battery life and of course the ultra card that is inside that machine. i do agree with aw being upgradeable and not voiding the warranty and all, but from the data that i got, i don't even think the 7700 can take the ultra card simply because of the high power consumption... i really love the looks of the 7700 and the fact that it can house 2 hdd and 2 cd drives but if it can't take even the 6800 ultra, then my question is just how upgradeable is it?
|