Wow, well, instead of going for a
acer TM 8100 pentium m 1.6 533fsb MR x700 128mb
i went for a
acer aspire 1693 pentium m 1.8 533 fsb MR x600 128mb
Really because i will be music making MORE than gaming so the extra few cpu mhz is needed more than the few extra grfx mhz
now on games, i thought i would get average performance, lower/med res, details on medium settings no aa/af.... which i could live with..
damn did i get supprised. I installed and loaded up UT 2004 and set it to 800x600 and put a few details up to high. It ran well, i thought hmm max it out a bit, find the limit.
I put it up to 1280x800 and left the detail settings as above, still ran fine.. wow i thought, so i upped the detail settings to max and thought well this is gonna push it, All details on HIGH/highest so it says "holy sh*t" when you apply em, and it still ran like a dream, smooth as anything.
Right this was with 2x AA so i exited and upped everything up to max, FS AA up to 6xT3 and AF up to 16x forced, and vertical sync.
IT STILL WORKED, it was very easily playable, it wasn't ideal (stat fps showed 26/28 average) but it ran ok. I chose a map with a lot of bots and action/scenery, i reckon putting AF/AA to 4x maybe 8x and you could average 35+ fps in UT2004
Well, this really supprised me. to say im pleased is an understatment. The x600 pci-e has slightly lower clock than 9700 but has quite a bit higher memory clock which makes a big difference apprently.
So just had to share all of this with you, feel free to comment/ask questions and please post some of your notebook/game experiences, id love to hear them,.
Many thanks
acer TM 8100 pentium m 1.6 533fsb MR x700 128mb
i went for a
acer aspire 1693 pentium m 1.8 533 fsb MR x600 128mb
Really because i will be music making MORE than gaming so the extra few cpu mhz is needed more than the few extra grfx mhz
now on games, i thought i would get average performance, lower/med res, details on medium settings no aa/af.... which i could live with..
damn did i get supprised. I installed and loaded up UT 2004 and set it to 800x600 and put a few details up to high. It ran well, i thought hmm max it out a bit, find the limit.
I put it up to 1280x800 and left the detail settings as above, still ran fine.. wow i thought, so i upped the detail settings to max and thought well this is gonna push it, All details on HIGH/highest so it says "holy sh*t" when you apply em, and it still ran like a dream, smooth as anything.
Right this was with 2x AA so i exited and upped everything up to max, FS AA up to 6xT3 and AF up to 16x forced, and vertical sync.
IT STILL WORKED, it was very easily playable, it wasn't ideal (stat fps showed 26/28 average) but it ran ok. I chose a map with a lot of bots and action/scenery, i reckon putting AF/AA to 4x maybe 8x and you could average 35+ fps in UT2004
Well, this really supprised me. to say im pleased is an understatment. The x600 pci-e has slightly lower clock than 9700 but has quite a bit higher memory clock which makes a big difference apprently.
So just had to share all of this with you, feel free to comment/ask questions and please post some of your notebook/game experiences, id love to hear them,.
Many thanks







I wonder how much it will be when it comes to the states
