the specs on these processors are not close to what i had read about before. i was looking for an a64 desktop build on a DTR chip so i'd read about the xp-m chips as well.
they list the xp-m 2800+ as 1.6ghz with 128k L2? that is a huge difference from the higher clickspeed and 4x L2 that i knew about. i called hp to see if it was true, and it was..
yet the a64 3000+ chip that i looked at had 1mb l2 cache, and the one hp is putting into these systems also does.
so are their xp-m chips very outdated versions, while the a64 chips are the current (clawhammer core) ones?
they list the xp-m 2800+ as 1.6ghz with 128k L2? that is a huge difference from the higher clickspeed and 4x L2 that i knew about. i called hp to see if it was true, and it was..
yet the a64 3000+ chip that i looked at had 1mb l2 cache, and the one hp is putting into these systems also does.
so are their xp-m chips very outdated versions, while the a64 chips are the current (clawhammer core) ones?







