Thanks for the pics, looks the same as my 7422 on the surface.
Btw, 5400 rpm HD?
Btw, 5400 rpm HD?
|
Originally Posted by randyman
I am sorry everyone, it appears I cannot attach photos. Its a bummer, I want to show pictures of the Hinges in particular. They appear to be a little more square than the ones that are cracking, but I can not be sure.
Anyway, I am still extremely satisfied with this machine. I ran several apps this morning with the computer on full power, and the battery still lasted nearly 2 hrs. I know it is not a long time, but with this size processor I think it is pretty good. |


|
Originally Posted by kirby
Hey Randyman, here is a tip from someone else about battery life.
![]() ![]() Originally Posted by RobertJasper Gateway didn't install the Mobile Athlon 64 driver on these laptops, they are using the windows built in driver. The windows driver will not throttle the CPU properly until after the computer has been in sleep mode. You can test this easily. With a full battery run CPU-Z and you will see that your CPU is running at full speed, and your battery remaining will be roughly 2 hours. Now put the computer to sleep, wait a minute, and then wake it up. Run CPU-Z again and your CPU will be running at 800MHz and the battery remaining will be roughly 3 hours. Just download and install the latest driver from AMD and you will have 3 hour battery life, without having to put the computer to sleep first. Hope this helps. |

|
Originally Posted by HardBall
There is really no comparison.
The PM 2.0 runs much cooler, but is comparable to a P4 3.0 - 3.2 depending on the application; 3.0 in encoding and editing apps, and the rest of the apps about a P4 3.2 The A64 3700 is equivalent to a P4 3.8 in most applications; except in encoding and video/photo editing, where HT shines, there the 3700 is only comparable to a P4 3.4. But in business, scientific, and other routine apps, the 3700 is comparable to the highest clocked P4 5xx, and in gaming, it even slightly tops the P4 3.8. So if you are looking for power, the 3700+ really runs away from the PM 2.0; but it should have much worse battery life. |
) Anyway, keep in mind that the XPS gen 2 has an incredibly superior video card. The ddr 2 is a joke, the cpu is ok, hard drive is configurable, but the video card is the bomb. If you got the XPS-2, I'm assuming gaming is involved somewhere in that decision -- if that's the case, the only reason not to go with the xps-2 is the size/weight or price in my opinion.|
Originally Posted by joeld100
I don't have either of these laptops, but I've been researching this stuff enough to laugh at a comparison between these two laptops. Sure, the 3700+ athlon is faster than the centrino in many applications, but beyond that, the dell is better in every respect besides size, not counting warranty stuff (heard bad things about dell
) Anyway, keep in mind that the XPS gen 2 has an incredibly superior video card. The ddr 2 is a joke, the cpu is ok, hard drive is configurable, but the video card is the bomb. If you got the XPS-2, I'm assuming gaming is involved somewhere in that decision -- if that's the case, the only reason not to go with the xps-2 is the size/weight or price in my opinion.Just didn't want to let that go unanswered... |
|
Originally Posted by anthean
I think Hardball was merely making a processor comparison (the Athlon64 3700+ vs a Pentium M 2.0), NOT a comparison between the two notebooks overall.
EDIT--Robert, I see you beat me by minute. |

|
Originally Posted by joeld100
I don't have either of these laptops, but I've been researching this stuff enough to laugh at a comparison between these two laptops. Sure, the 3700+ athlon is faster than the centrino in many applications, but beyond that, the dell is better in every respect besides size, not counting warranty stuff (heard bad things about dell
) Anyway, keep in mind that the XPS gen 2 has an incredibly superior video card. The ddr 2 is a joke, the cpu is ok, hard drive is configurable, but the video card is the bomb. If you got the XPS-2, I'm assuming gaming is involved somewhere in that decision -- if that's the case, the only reason not to go with the xps-2 is the size/weight or price in my opinion.Just didn't want to let that go unanswered... |
|
Originally Posted by RobertJasper
It wasn't a comparison between those two notebooks, it was a comparison between the processors.
|
|
Originally Posted by anthean
I think Hardball was merely making a processor comparison (the Athlon64 3700+ vs a Pentium M 2.0), NOT a comparison between the two notebooks overall.
|
|
Originally Posted by SerbiaNem
http://www.amd.com/us-en/Corporate/V...~96667,00.html
Looks like the 3700+ in the Gateway 7426gx is the Mobile Athlon 64 69w TDP version. |
|
Originally Posted by SerbiaNem
http://www.amd.com/us-en/Corporate/V...~96667,00.html
Looks like the 3700+ in the Gateway 7426gx is the Mobile Athlon 64 69w TDP version. |

|
Originally Posted by AlexRuiz
I am pretty sure the announcement of the mobile Athlon 64 3700+ (62W) will coincide with this machine. As someone mentioned, they have maxed the computer, so my guess is that the next refreshing is not going to be a refreshing... it is going to be a new model.
Guess for Jul 2005: Mobile Athlon 64 (Turion?) x700 128 MB PCI-E |