NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Dell Notebook Forums › Dell Notebook Reviews › Dell Inspiron 9300 Review
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Dell Inspiron 9300 Review

post #1 of 99
Thread Starter 
This review is done thanks to member shboyles. Be sure and check out the tons of pics at the bottom which are thumbnailed from an 1100X res.

Processor:
Intel® Pentium® M Processor 760 (2GHz, 2MB Cache, 533MHz FSB)
Intel® 915PM Chipset with PCI Express

OS:
Microsoft® Windows® XP Professional

Memory:
1GB DDR2 533MHZ MEMORY (2 x 512MB Modules)

Ports:
IEEE 1394 integrated port
6-USB 2.0 (Universal Serial Bus) compliant 4-pin connectors
Video: 15-pin monitor connector
Digital Video Interface (DVI)
S-Video: 7-pin mini-DIN connector
Audio jacks: Stereo headphones/speakers miniconnector (same as line-out), microphone miniconnector

LCD
17-inch Wide-Aspect WUXGA display with TrueLifeTM Glossy (1920x1200)

Size
Height: 1.6-inches (41.5 mm)
Width: 15.5-inches (394 mm)
Depth: 11.3-inches (287 mm)
Weight: 7.85 lbs. (3.56 kg).

Power:
6 Cell 53 WHr Lithium Ion Primary battery. Approximate operating time: Up to 3.4 hours

AC Adapter: Output power: 90W standard, Input voltage: 90 to 264 VAC

Slots:
Connectors: (1) Type I or Type II card
3.3 and 5 V cards supported

Graphics:
PCI ExpressTM x16
256MB DDR NVIDIA® GeForceTM Go 6800 (NOT DDR3 Version)

Storage:
8x DVD+/-RW
100GB 5400 RPM Seagate Momentus Drive (Came with a 100GB 4200RPM Fujitsu Drive)

Audio:
Integrated stereo sound
Integrated subwoofer

Communication Devices:
Integrated 10/100 Ethernet (Broadcom 440x)
Dell 1350 internal wireless solution (802.11b/g)
Dell TrueMobile 350 internal Bluetooth module



Review:

Chassis/Build/Apearance:

The build quality is very good in comparison with past models Dell has released. It is actually identical to that of the Inspiron 9200 model. Same dell quicksnap Covers are offered to change the appearance of the cover to the LCD. Considering the size of the notebook, it is fairly light weighing in at just under 8lbs.

Keyboard/Touchpad:

The keyboard has no Flex. (Identical to that of the 9200)….Considering it is a 17” notebook, there is NO numberpad/extended keyboard. Keyboard feels very good overall.

Speakers/Sound:

The sound is very good/loud. However if the sound is cranked up too much, distortion is heard out of both the subwoofer and the front speakers which reside under the palmrests

Display:

This is what everyone is anxious to see. After the HORRIBLE WUXGA screen Dell offered on the 9200 model, they added this “truelife” WUXGA screen to the 9300. Basically it is the same WUXGA that is found on the 9200, except it has a GLOSSY Coating. Therefore, everyone who is familiar with the “sparkle effect” that was apparent on the 9200 screens, is also apparent on the 9300 model. However, I feel that the coating as some how made the screen seam brighter and lessened the sparkle effect (I would say the sparkle effect is about 50% of the 9200 screen’s sparkle)

The sparkle effect goes almost entirely away when watching DVD’s, or playing games. In fact I found the screen was EXCELLENT under gaming conditions. Definitely a major improvement from the 9200’s screens. The screen doesn’t have very good uniformity. It has to be angled perfectly in order to get the brightest picture out of it. There is also some minor light leakage in the bottom most part of the screen.

Graphics/Performance:

The model reviewed came with the Nvidia Geforce GO 6800. It is the DDR1 version. It came stock clocked at 290/590 (GPU/MEM).

I was able to overclock it to 340/750 without any problems or artifacts.

Battery Life:

The model reviewed came with the 6-cell battery which lasts around 3-3.4 hours. There is 9-cell battery option which can last 5 hours.

Fan Noise/Cooling:

There are fan exausts in the back and on the sides towards the back. The fans are WHISPER QUIET…Even during gaming and intense CPU/GPU usage!


Benchmarks:

STOCK CLOCK RESULTS (290/590):

3DMark03: 8065

3DMark05: 3322

Aquamark 3: 48813

UT2004 1024x768: 157fps

DOOM3 1024x768: 71fps

Far Cry 1024x768: 65

Far Cry 1280x1024: 60

HL2 BenchemallDemo 1024x768: 45fps


OVERCLOCKING RESULTS (401/685):

3dmark03: 10119

3dmark05: 4337

Aquamark3: 60,524

UT2004 1024x768: 161fps

DOOM3 1024x768: 83fps

Far Cry 1024x768: 64

Far Cry 1280x1024: 63

HL2 BenchemallDemo 1024x768: 43fps


Some more thoughts, Pros/Cons:

This is one of the best laptops Dell has released to date. Although the Inspiron XPS 2 with it’s LED lights, and Nvidia Geforce GO 6800 ULTRA will put this laptop to shame. The 9300 is well priced for what you can get in it. Where Dell comes short with this laptop is that there is NO GIGABIT (which is offered in the XPS 2). And of course the screen….Which I feel is a big improvement from the 9200 WUXGA screen, however, it doesn’t even come close to competing with the Sony A-Series 17” XBRITE Screens. By adding the gloss coating to the WUXGA screen it does seem better for text, and while gaming or watching DVD’s it is very good looking. Would also be nice to see Dell offer ATI Graphics in the 9300/XPS 2 models (Such as the Radeon X800 Mobility). The unit also has BOTH DVI and VGA ports. Will review the XPS 2 when I receive it in early April.















































































Below are more pictures of the Dell next to the Sony XBrite with the last two pictures being next to the Sager 9860. The Dell 9300 is on the right side of all the following pics:


























post #2 of 99
5 hours on 9 cell...........awesome

dont like the sound of the light leakage........hmmm......
post #3 of 99
I promised myself that I would wait... but I got to tell you, my fingers be itchin', mate.
post #4 of 99
My guess is that the guy got 5 hours from Dell's site, which is actually the battery life for the 9200 (read the footnote on Dell's site).

What is this about "sparkles" on a glossy screen?! The sparkles on the LG Philips panel supplied on some 9200's were due to the anti-glare coating. There should be no anti-glare coating on the 9300's LCD. Is this guy saying that Dell just put a glossy coat on top of the old LCD?!
post #5 of 99
Quote:
Originally Posted by dellbert
My guess is that the guy got 5 hours from Dell's site, which is actually the battery life for the 9200 (read the footnote on Dell's site).

What is this about "sparkles" on a glossy screen?! The sparkles on the LG Philips panel supplied on some 9200's were due to the anti-glare coating. There should be no anti-glare coating on the 9300's LCD. Is this guy saying that Dell just put a glossy coat on top of the old LCD?!

Take it easy .........lol...........lets see what others say.......i guess we all picking out of a jar .......trying to see if we dont get the cracked cookie i guess.....
post #6 of 99
Quote:
Originally Posted by dellbert
My guess is that the guy got 5 hours from Dell's site, which is actually the battery life for the 9200 (read the footnote on Dell's site).

What is this about "sparkles" on a glossy screen?! The sparkles on the LG Philips panel supplied on some 9200's were due to the anti-glare coating. There should be no anti-glare coating on the 9300's LCD. Is this guy saying that Dell just put a glossy coat on top of the old LCD?!

Not exactly.....Let's see what other people say about it when they see it...but i went through 3 9200's with that LG philips screen, and sent them all back because of the sparkle effect.....Like the review states, i found there is still some kind of sparkle effect there.....but the screen is better than the LG philips one that was horrible on the 9200.....but on the 9300, the whites are still not very white....and the screen has to be looked at, at a "certain" angle to get the fully brightness of the screen...and it isn't uniform it seems no matter what angle you try to look at it from....I am anxious to see how the WXGA screen looks, but i'm only assuming that it will be identical to that of the 9200 which was a fairly bright/good WXGA screen.

I think the Truelife WUXGA screen is definately an improvement from the 9200's horrible screen, but it's no where near the crispness, clarity, and brightness/contrast of the Sony XBRITE WUXGA screens....

-Scotty
post #7 of 99
Quote:
Originally Posted by LUOLOGY1
5 hours on 9 cell...........awesome

dont like the sound of the light leakage........hmmm......
I wouldn't worry about the light leakage at this point... don't think it'll be a big problem at all.
post #8 of 99
Yeah, the glossy screen on the 700m is similar. You need to view it head-on. And a lot of people have light leakage, which on a glossy screen creates sort of a milky white glow.

We've already had confirmation that the 9300 WXGA+ is identical to the 9200's. Same model number, W5411.

I'm still not sure what you mean by "sparkle" on the 9300, but I guess I'll just have to see it for myself
post #9 of 99
If you read back on these forums and on other forums about the 9200 and "sparkle effect" you'll hear lots of complaints about what i'm talking about...some people say its a "greesy" look...other people say it's like looking through a fine screen door........hard to really describe...hate to say this, but you really need to see it for yourself in person.....it's most apparent on white backgrounds.....the whites look "dithered"....and are not as "brite white" as a result......whereas if you look at many other LCD's, especially the screen on the Sager 9860, the sony XBRITES, the Fujitsu Clearview's, etc.....the whites are more solid white.

-Scotty
post #10 of 99
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottman
Given the fact that the "Truelife" is so close in price to the WXGA+, that might be one explanation. If it was an entirely new type of screen for dell, I would have expected a larger price difference. But if it is just a cheap glossy film, I'm sure dell will have quite a few unhappy customers (and returns). But that's about par for a new release from them lately. Keep your fingers crossed that this review is just one skewed opinion.

What we really need to see is someone who actually still owns a 9200 with the WUXGA screen and see a side by side comparison of the two screens....
But i dont think as many people will be returning this laptop as they did the 9200....because like is said it is an improvement over the 9200 screen, and i really feel that the sparkle effect has been reduced on the 9300...

-Scotty
post #11 of 99
I'm guessing it's similar to the HP ZD8000 brightview screen. When I compared that to the sony, it had a "screen door" sort of look and was dimmer. Can anyone that has seen both the HP and Dell comment?
post #12 of 99
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottman
I'm guessing it's similar to the HP ZD8000 brightview screen. When I compared that to the sony, it had a "screen door" sort of look and was dimmer. Can anyone that has seen both the HP and Dell comment?

Interesting that you say that......I have seen both teh ZD8000 WXGA brightview screen, and the WSXGA brightview screens......the WXGA DOES have the sparkle effect.....but the WSXGA doesn't........in fact the WSXGA+ brightview screen on the ZD8000 looks IDENTICAL to the WSXGA screen that is on the Sager 9860/8790

-Scotty
post #13 of 99
Quote:
Originally Posted by shboyles
Interesting that you say that......I have seen both teh ZD8000 WXGA brightview screen, and the WSXGA brightview screens......the WXGA DOES have the sparkle effect.....but the WSXGA doesn't........in fact the WSXGA+ brightview screen on the ZD8000 looks IDENTICAL to the WSXGA screen that is on the Sager 9860/8790

-Scotty
Yes, it was a WXGA Brightview HP that I was comparing to the Sony (unfair, I know but that's all they had). Too bad Dell doesn't offer the Sager/HP WSXGA+ on the 9300 or I would have gone for that over the non-truelife.
post #14 of 99
That is EXACTLY the way i feel.....I think the Sager 9860's and HP ZD8000 WSXGA would be a GREAT sceen for the 9300......maybe Dell will listen in and start offering an "in between" option on their 17" notebook line ...instead of one extreme or the other (WXGA/WUXGA)

-Scotty
post #15 of 99
Quote:
it doesn’t even come close to competing with the Sony A-Series 17” XBRITE Screens
That's a shame! I saw those Sony screens at Best Buy! and Omg man.. They're bea-uty-fulll !!!
post #16 of 99
Scotty, one of the other 9300 owners confirmed that his WUXGA was made by Samsung. Can you give us your Dell part number (on your packing slip), and if possible, let us know who makes your display.

Here's a thread about the 9200 panels which may help you id your panel:
http://notebookforums.com/showthread.php?t=55769

I'm still in shock about the "sparkles." Like I said, that should be an artifact of the anti-glare coating, which doesn't (or shouldn't) exist on your panel unless Dell did something REALLY CHEESY.
post #17 of 99
I will just be glad when a few more of these get in peoples hands here. True I did not like a few things in that review, but I think most of us are all after a quality screen plus computer.
So I am gonna wait with fingers crossed til I hear a few more reviews
post #18 of 99

Those Screens

Ya know, I was just in Best Buy tonight and was looking at the screens of the Sonys, HPs, and Toshibas. In my opinion, the Toshibas destroyed the Sony's screen. The HP was even better than the Sony I thought. The Toshiba had a gorgeous screen. I looked at all 17" glossy screens.

I attached the pictures of the screens I viewed tonight to this message. Only editing done was cropping and resizing the photos. No color alteration.

I'm hoping my 9300 will be something in the range of the HP or Toshiba.
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
post #19 of 99
Oh man, I really like the numeric keypad built in.
post #20 of 99
Hmm, can't see the "sparkle" effect on the screenshot ...
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Dell Notebook Reviews
NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Dell Notebook Forums › Dell Notebook Reviews › Dell Inspiron 9300 Review