NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Sager & Clevo Notebook Forums › Sager & Clevo Notebook Reviews › Some LCD/Benchmark comparisons (Sager/Sager/Dell)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Some LCD/Benchmark comparisons (Sager/Sager/Dell)

post #1 of 8
9/7/03 at 11:58pm
Thread Starter 
The Dell 8500 had the 15.4" "Ultra Sharp" WXGA, the Sager 4760 had the 17" WXGA, the Sager 4060 had the 15" SXGA+, the Sager 5680 had the 15" UXGA, the Sager 8890 had the 16" SXGA, and the Sager 8887 had the 16" UXGA.


Sager 4760/Dell 8500


Sager 4760/Dell 8500


Sager 4760/Dell 8500


Sager 5680/Dell 8500


Sager 5680/Dell 8500


Sager 5680/4060


Sager 8890/8887


Sager 8890/8887


Sager 5680/8890


Sager 5680/4060


Sager 5680/4060


Sager 5680/4060






Sorry, but some of the pics didn't come out and they were deleted. The Sager 4760 had a little better above and below viewing than the Dell, but they appeared close in angle viewing. All of the LCDs had really great angle viewing except the 4060 which was probably average for laptops. The 5680 of course had the best viewing angles. As you can tell the 8890 brightness needed turned down just a tad as did the 5680 and the 8887 could have been turned up a lil.

BENCHMARKS

The Dell 8500 had a 2.5GHZ CPU/400FSB, 640MB 266DDR, GF4 4200 64MB.

The Sager 4760 had a 3.0GHZ CPU/533FSB, 1024MB 333DDR, ATI 9000 128MB.

The Sager 5680 had a 3.2GHZ CPU/800FSB, 1024MB 400DDR (dual channel), ATI 9600PRO 128MB.


Sandra MAX3 CPU ALU
5680 9659
Dell 8500 6194
4760 9471
Sandra MAX3 CPU FPU
5680 2766
Dell 8500 1431
4760 2638
Sandra MAX3 CPU SSE
5680 6164
Dell 8500 3246
4760 5772

Sandra MAX3 CPU Multi-Media Integer
5680 14783
Dell 8500 9338
4760 14112
Sandra MAX3 CPU Multi-Media Float
5680 23367
Dell 8500 12487
4760 5772

Sandra MAX3 Memory Bandwidth
5680 4318/4320
Dell 8500 1823/1823
4760 2375/2374


The Desktop had a P4 2.4GHZ CPU/533FSB, 1024MB DDR 333, and a GF4 ti4200 64MB.

UT2K3 800 X 600 Flyby
Desktop 163
5680 204
Dell 8500 135
4760 120

UT2K3 800 X 600 Botmatch
Desktop 57
5680 76
Dell 8500 50
4760 59

UT2K3 1024 X 768 Flyby
Desktop 129
5680 146
Dell 8500 98
4760 80

UT2K3 1024 X 768 Botmatch
Desktop 57
5680 75
Dell 8500 47
4760 50

X2 The Threat ave FPS benchmark
Desktop 63
5680 58
Dell 8500 47
4760 40

GunMetal Benchmark 1
LOW/AVE/HIGH
Desktop 8.74/16.76/41.54
5680 8.87/16.10/58.07
Dell 8500 Tried 2 different DX versions, wouldn't run.
4760 8.72/14.59/36.42

Don't complain if you feel we're doing apples to oranges, we had them here together and thought we'd compare. The 8500 was straight from Dell almost 100% as they ship it. The 5680 and 4760 were also as Sager ships them. We didn't tweak any of the LCDs for their best view as far as brightness or anything else just took some as is pics to share.

If anyone complains about the KB flexing in the Sager, you really need to use a Dell 8500 for awhile. I couldn't believe how badly it was flexing and tapping with normal use.
Reply
Reply
post #2 of 8
9/8/03 at 12:08am
Wow great pics Adam. The 8887 screen appears to have the most vibrant color though, but it could just be the picture. Most people seem think the 8890 screen's better anyway, so that's gotta be saying something. Can't wait to see that 5680 in person!

*edit*
Adam feel free to delete/move my post if it got in the way of your nice layout...i won't take it personal
Reply
Reply
post #3 of 8
9/8/03 at 4:07am
OH MY GOD!
I just made a mess in my pants .

Those Sagers are just so cool (hot?). If no other post convinces anyone about the superiority of Sager then nothing will.

Thank you Adam . The sale is made. I gotta get to my bank, convert some $A and order that 8890.

Here's a bunch of bananas for you all...
Reply
Reply
post #4 of 8
9/8/03 at 12:11pm
why does the 4760 screen look so much better than the 5680 screen. i thought they were similar in stats? that 4760 screen (3.jpg) looks UNBELIEVABLE!

those benchmarks give me goosebumps
Reply
Reply
post #5 of 8
9/8/03 at 12:38pm
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally posted by Laopooh
why does the 4760 screen look so much better than the 5680 screen. i thought they were similar in stats? that 4760 screen (3.jpg) looks UNBELIEVABLE!

those benchmarks give me goosebumps
The 4760 and 5680 screens are pretty close in quality except the 5680 has a little better above and below angle viewing.
Reply
Reply
post #6 of 8
9/8/03 at 2:25pm
I still think, aside from some ghosting, that the UXGA 16.1" screen of the 8887 (what I have) is REALLY nice.

And I usually turn the gamma DOWN, it doesn't need to go UP! The other screens looked too bright to me... plus the wide-angle ones weren't that much wider (if at all) to the 16.1" UXGA which makes me feel good.

-myrkat
Reply
Reply
post #7 of 8
9/8/03 at 7:22pm
anychance on reviewing the 8600 from an unbiased person like adam? hes probabaly the mst unbiased reviewer if id ever seen one and it would be great to get th eperformance control from your point of view adam
Reply
Reply
post #8 of 8
9/9/03 at 4:06pm
Hmmm, in that bottom picture there are 3 notebooks which are clearly brighter than the rest - the dell, the 5680 and one of the big 88XX models - is that your impression Adam??
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Sager & Clevo Notebook Reviews
NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Sager & Clevo Notebook Forums › Sager & Clevo Notebook Reviews › Some LCD/Benchmark comparisons (Sager/Sager/Dell)