NotebookForums.com › Forums › General Notebook Discussions › Notebook Guides › Simple Undervolting Tutorial - Pentium M Dothan
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Simple Undervolting Tutorial - Pentium M Dothan - Page 29

post #561 of 1202
7/25/05 at 5:20am
bleh im stilll not sure if this is helping me that much. im just surfing the net right now and the fan spun up so i dunno

anyone have any other tings i could use to mess with stuff? i couldnt get fangui to install
Reply
Reply
post #562 of 1202
7/25/05 at 9:33am
Quote:
Originally Posted by kinaiahi
So since I've got mine set to maximal on ac and minimal on battery instead of dynamic switching it shouldn't matter right?
why would you want it set to Maximal all the time? You're losin' the whole benefit of havin' a Pent M with SpeedStep...

the idea is to let it self-adjust its multiplier/speed as needed, instead of runnin' at max all the time...

there's no performance benefit to it, you're just wastin' unneeded cycles and increasin' the heat...

course please do what you want... don't wanna tell anybody what they should do, just don't understand...
Reply
Reply
post #563 of 1202
7/25/05 at 9:52am
Quote:
Originally Posted by alexrib
Great post !!!!!
I was thinking about taking my W1NA to repair because of the heating problem(W1758NAUH -Dothan 1.7GHz, rev. B1- 512 Ram 333 - ATI Radeon 9600 64Mb WXGA 1280X800 Omega 2.6.25a drivers...
just realized this, you have an ATI, so you might wanna look at CHC... it's fan control and GPU control, but only for ATI's...
Reply
Reply
post #564 of 1202
7/25/05 at 10:15am
Quote:
Originally Posted by alexrib
Great post !!!!!
I was thinking about taking my W1NA to repair because of the heating problem(W1758NAUH -Dothan 1.7GHz, rev. B1- 512 Ram 333 - ATI Radeon 9600 64Mb WXGA 1280X800 Omega 2.6.25a drivers...
just realized this, you have an ATI, so you might wanna look at CHC... it's fan control and GPU control, but only for ATI's...
Reply
Reply
post #565 of 1202
7/25/05 at 1:17pm
I switched over to CHC and I have nvidia. I think it's a cleaner interface and works just as well as RMclock, not to mention that it has a built in temperature display. Btw, undervolting took me load temp from 56C to 44C
Reply
Reply
post #566 of 1202
7/25/05 at 2:28pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. K6
...Btw, undervolting took me load temp from 56C to 44C
wow that's great! happy for ya guy...
Reply
Reply
post #567 of 1202
7/26/05 at 5:36am
Hey guys! I have gotten mine down to 0.732v and 0.998v max.
Reply
Reply
post #568 of 1202
7/26/05 at 9:39am
Just wondering, what is the point in having values for the multipliers in between the min and max settings? It seems like on my notebook that it either runs at 1.73GHz or throttles downs to 800MHz but i never see it in speeds in between those two values?

Thanks.
Reply
Reply
post #569 of 1202
7/26/05 at 10:34am
Mine uses most of my multipliers, it doesnt stay in that state for long but when open up web pages and the like it will throttle part way up
Reply
Reply
post #570 of 1202
7/26/05 at 11:07am
Quote:
Originally Posted by orangeguy
Just wondering, what is the point in having values for the multipliers in between the min and max settings? It seems like on my notebook that it either runs at 1.73GHz or throttles downs to 800MHz but i never see it in speeds in between those two values?

Thanks.
yeah, mine uses 'em quite a bit... it hangs at 800 then shoots up when it has to really work... sometimes all the way, then other times just part way...

it's funny... it seems to react awesomely fast but at times it seems to hang for a couple of seconds... when hardly doin' anything... but when i really push it, it runs like a scalded dog... gawd it's fast and sooo efficent too.. sweet
Reply
Reply
post #571 of 1202
7/26/05 at 11:02pm

ULV processors

I am sorry for repeating this question here. It was not answered when I posted it one month ago or so.

Does someone have information about undervolting of ULV and LV Pentium processors. I am interested to know how much these processors can be undervolted in comparison with their specifications.
Reply
Reply
post #572 of 1202
7/27/05 at 11:35am
Hey guys, just started trying this and it's awesome! I've got my max down to .924 and my minimum is .700 still. This is on a 700m 1.6. I've run the torture test for 6 hours, and it's working fine! I only have one question: I've been reading people's replies and some have said they use all the states between 0 and 9. So far all I've got is the maximum state and the minimum state. Should I add 7 more states in between? Also, what voltages/modifiers should I set the in-between states at? Thanks for any answers guys; it'd be much appreciated!
Reply
Reply
post #573 of 1202
7/27/05 at 12:02pm
it automatically sets them for you... if you're usin' the newest ver 1.6, these might help ya...
btw, 1.6 is much better than the previous versions...

Reply
Reply
post #574 of 1202
7/27/05 at 1:01pm
Thank you so much Tar Heel; that fixed that. I've got one other question though if you could help me. When I go to the General tab and look at the voltages, current and minimal are fine. Current is at 16.0x Fid and .924 Vid, which is what my maximum should be. Minimal is at 6.0x and .700 which is what my minimum should be. However, startup is at 6.0 and .988 and maximal is still at 16.0 and 1.340. I'm running P95 full blast right now, and my actual clock is still at 1600, and my current is staying at .924. So, as of now, it's running perfectly. However, will the startup/maximum fields affect anything? Should they be different? Do I need to tweak anything to make the maximum/startup fields show the minimum and maximum voltages that I allow? Thanks for any help dude; you're awesome!
Reply
Reply
post #575 of 1202
7/27/05 at 2:28pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by TMolloy
Thank you so much Tar Heel; that fixed that. I've got one other question though if you could help me. When I go to the General tab and look at the voltages, current and minimal are fine. Current is at 16.0x Fid and .924 Vid, which is what my maximum should be. Minimal is at 6.0x and .700 which is what my minimum should be. However, startup is at 6.0 and .988 and maximal is still at 16.0 and 1.340. I'm running P95 full blast right now, and my actual clock is still at 1600, and my current is staying at .924. So, as of now, it's running perfectly. However, will the startup/maximum fields affect anything? Should they be different? Do I need to tweak anything to make the maximum/startup fields show the minimum and maximum voltages that I allow? Thanks for any help dude; you're awesome!
first, thank you, always glad to help when i can...

and your General page looks very much like mine and everybody elses... Startup and Maximal are set when you boot BEFORE RMClock is runnin' so you're seein' the defaults for your 'puter...

lol relax and enjoy now! and spread the word to others... that's how we all learn... look at my sig...
Reply
Reply
post #576 of 1202
7/27/05 at 3:36pm
Haha, thanks so much. This is totally awesome.
Reply
Reply
post #577 of 1202
7/27/05 at 5:09pm
Sorry but I've got yet another question. I have RMClock set up fine, but for some reason it's neither starting up when the computer starts, nor is it keeping my profile. I threw the icon in the startup folder to make RMClock startup, but it's still reverting back to default voltages. Instead of using my .700/.908 voltages it's using the default .700/1.340 voltages. I have the startup and start in tray icons chosen, and I've hit apply in the management section. I have it set to automatic management. However, it's still reverting to defaults. Any ideas?
Reply
Reply
post #578 of 1202
7/27/05 at 6:24pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by TMolloy
Sorry but I've got yet another question. I have RMClock set up fine, but for some reason it's neither starting up when the computer starts, nor is it keeping my profile. I threw the icon in the startup folder to make RMClock startup, but it's still reverting back to default voltages. Instead of using my .700/.908 voltages it's using the default .700/1.340 voltages. I have the startup and start in tray icons chosen, and I've hit apply in the management section. I have it set to automatic management. However, it's still reverting to defaults. Any ideas?
This is a re-post of post # 543... should take care of it...

Quote:
Originally Posted by tetrismaster
I got everything working thanks to you guys, but my problem now is that whenever I reboot my laptop the profile will always be at Maximal instead of automatic. I have restore default unchecked and startup checked.

My cpu also always runs at max speed even with the automatic profile set, but until I check "use os load-based..." it then winds down and then goes back up when needed. This also doesn't appear automatically checked after a reboot. Is there a way to make sure these things are checked upon boot up so that I don't have to keep checking the settings?

Btw, thanks again for taking the time to help us.
this is from the RMClock forum...

I have a Dell Inspiron XPS Gen II, Pentium M770 2.13GHz. Ver 1.6 is far better than the previous version! I can actually use the Monitoring tab w/o pgm failing and Task Manager is normal! HUGE THANK YOU to Dmitri!!! YOU THA MAN!!!

However the new version would not save my settings on exit. I start the pgm from Startup as opposed to chking "Start Minimized to Tray". After resetting all the values for the nth time (and YES clicking Apply under Mgmt tab and Advanced tab and checking "Remember these settings"), I clicked the X (close) button in the upper right corner. Voila! Problem solved! But would be nice not to have to do this. Usually Apply and/or Remember... are enough to save your settings.

Dmitri Besedin:
Actually, the setting should be saved fine even when Windows uses session terminates. I thought I've resolved this issue since version 1.3 . However, I'll try to check what you describe on my system.

btw, Dmitri is the author of RMClock...

here's the forum...
Reply
Reply
post #579 of 1202
7/27/05 at 6:28pm
btw, the post from the RMClock forum is mine... i'm RLW over there... but that forum is kinda hard to use because ppl with all cpu's are askin' questions... wish he'd segregate it by processor... so i understand everybody postin' over here about probs with it...
Reply
Reply
post #580 of 1202
8/2/05 at 12:20pm
Can someone write a guide using RMClock 1.6. I'm getting a little confused with the new Management tab.
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Notebook Guides
NotebookForums.com › Forums › General Notebook Discussions › Notebook Guides › Simple Undervolting Tutorial - Pentium M Dothan