New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Cheap Processor Upgrade? - Page 8

post #141 of 754
Quote:
Originally Posted by blbrchnk
Where exactly on these processors are you adding the wires?
could someone provide a picture? i tried taking pictures the last time i did it but they all came out terribly. my canon a75 sucks. or maybe i do at taking pictures


edit: but in words, youre making bridges with the wire and dropping them into the socket on the motherbaord itself.


lga sockets must be a pain in the ass. would have to tie knots id imagine
post #142 of 754
Yes, take a look at the pin-in and pin-out diagram from the Intel specsheet for the 533FSB Pentium-M.

ftp://download.intel.com/design/mobi...s/30526201.pdf

We already know that bridging the C15 and C16 with a fine copper wire tricks the motherboard into running the processor at 533FSB. This did increase the FSB of my pentium-M 1.7 to 533, but left it unstable at the core speed of 2.26ghz. So, I bridged G3 and H3 as well.

Now, there are reasons why I chose this particular pin. By bridging G3 and H3, you force the Vid3 pin to always report to the motherboard that it (the Vid3 pin) is low (or 0). The Pentium-M works by letting the software (Windows XP, Bios, etc) tell it when to shift states to change it's multiplier. When the pentium-M receives a request to change multipliers, it sends a request to the motherboard to increase (or decrease) the voltage based on some predetermined internal settings. It uses the 5 vid pins (F2, F3, G3, G4, and H4) to communicate to the motherboard what voltage it would like. If you look around in the Intel specsheet for the voltage table (I think its page 16), and study the voltages that the PM 1.7 shifts through (using CPU-Z for example), then you will eventually figure out that you can affect minor changes in voltage requests by changing these pins.

Now, the pin bridging I chose is not the only one that will work. When my PM1.7 is at the 6x multiplier, the voltage is 0.988, so my Vid pins are 101101 (moving from vid5 to vid0). When it is at 17x multiplier, the voltage is 1.324, which is 011000. If I permanently ground vid3, then my vids change to 100101 (which is 1.116 voltage), and 010000 (which is 1.452 voltage, a 0.128 increase).

Now, its possible to actually lock the processor down to only one voltage, but that would make it run hot all the time (like a prescott). That's why I chose vid3. It still varies the voltage when the multiplier changes, so it is still somewhat efficient.
post #143 of 754
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stomper
Yes, take a look at the pin-in and pin-out diagram from the Intel specsheet for the 533FSB Pentium-M.

ftp://download.intel.com/design/mobi...s/30526201.pdf

We already know that bridging the C15 and C16 with a fine copper wire tricks the motherboard into running the processor at 533FSB. This did increase the FSB of my pentium-M 1.7 to 533, but left it unstable at the core speed of 2.26ghz. So, I bridged G3 and H3 as well.

Now, there are reasons why I chose this particular pin. By bridging G3 and H3, you force the Vid3 pin to always report to the motherboard that it (the Vid3 pin) is low (or 0). The Pentium-M works by letting the software (Windows XP, Bios, etc) tell it when to shift states to change it's multiplier. When the pentium-M receives a request to change multipliers, it sends a request to the motherboard to increase (or decrease) the voltage based on some predetermined internal settings. It uses the 5 vid pins (F2, F3, G3, G4, and H4) to communicate to the motherboard what voltage it would like. If you look around in the Intel specsheet for the voltage table (I think its page 16), and study the voltages that the PM 1.7 shifts through (using CPU-Z for example), then you will eventually figure out that you can affect minor changes in voltage requests by changing these pins.

Now, the pin bridging I chose is not the only one that will work. When my PM1.7 is at the 6x multiplier, the voltage is 0.988, so my Vid pins are 101101 (moving from vid5 to vid0). When it is at 17x multiplier, the voltage is 1.324, which is 011000. If I permanently ground vid3, then my vids change to 100101 (which is 1.116 voltage), and 010000 (which is 1.452 voltage, a 0.128 increase).

Now, its possible to actually lock the processor down to only one voltage, but that would make it run hot all the time (like a prescott). That's why I chose vid3. It still varies the voltage when the multiplier changes, so it is still somewhat efficient.
have you tried using rmclock at this point to undervolt the cpu to only what it needs? 0.7v should be enough at 6x133=800. not sure about the high side though. would have to prime to find out
post #144 of 754
Good idea, Ziddey. Using the voltage chart, I can run the 6x multiplier at .828 (anything lower will just shift 8 spots up because vid3 is permanently grounded). The maximal voltage is more tricky because vid3 is grounded. RMclock doesn't know that vid3 is permanently grounded, so it reports the wrong voltage. However, using the chart, you can figure it out. I found that the exact voltage this CPU needs at 17x is 1.404 (in RMClock it is 1.276). At 1.388, Prime95 finds an error. So I was able to shave .048 volts off of the maximum and .16 volts off the minimum.

Thanks Ziddey!
post #145 of 754
Hey stomper congrats, now I wish I woulda sprung the extra 50 for the 1.7, it would be awesome if you could post step by step photos on how you did this, I think I have an idea but a guide would rule.
post #146 of 754
Definately gonna have to get a 1.7 400fsb P-M when I get some dough, so that I can try this. Is it still running fine for ya stomper?
post #147 of 754
i bridged G3 and H3, and its still failing prime95. Also cpuz isnt showing any change in voltage

What do you think I am doing wrong Stomper?
post #148 of 754
If buying a new notebook, consider taking a lesser P-M (often saving a few hundred) and then popping in the 2.26 when it comes in June

Ok right that wouldn't be nearly as much fun!!
post #149 of 754
Toy-yoda, CPU-Z and RMClock report the voltage based on what the CPU says it SHOULD be at. If you ground VID3, the CPU isn't aware of it, but the motherboard is.

After bridging the G3 and H3 pins, you are still getting errors in prime95? Did your temps rise at all? My temps jumped considerably.

If you are sure that everything worked, you could try grounding vid4. That will result in a much higher voltage, but you should be able to use RMClock to bump it down.

Grounding vid4 will result in 001000 which is 1.580 volts at 17x. At that voltage, my CPU reach 70C in about 45 seconds, so I would not recommend keeping it there. However, if you ground Vid4, and use RMClock to set it for 1.212, you will actually be at 1.468 volts. You can then increase the voltage (in RMClock) step by step until Prime95 stabilizes.
post #150 of 754
Last night, I played WOW for almost 6 hours nonstop. No problems at all. This morning, I ran Prime95 at full tilt for 4 hours without any problems. So far, so good.
post #151 of 754
Hmm, I already gave up after messing with it for a couple hours.

I tried vid3 and vid4 but each time I got the exact same error in prime95 at the same time. Either I did it wrong the five times I pinmodded it or maybe something else happened.

The memory speed doesnt increase, does it? I also took some pics, I will post them later
post #152 of 754
Here are the pics, including the error I got






post #153 of 754
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stomper
Last night, I played WOW for almost 6 hours nonstop. No problems at all. This morning, I ran Prime95 at full tilt for 4 hours without any problems. So far, so good.

Can you run a superpi benchmark so we can see how much the speed increase is?
post #154 of 754
Thread Starter 
He got a 36 Seconds for 1M.
post #155 of 754
Yah, SuperPI 1M in 36 seconds.

Toy-Yoda, sorry that yours is not working. You have the FSB wire in the right spot. The memory is not affected by either pin bridges.
post #156 of 754
Hey, Toy-Yoda and I both have the XPS2 northbridge heatsink. Which means, no heatsink mods necessary to put the 6800 Ultra in our laptops.
post #157 of 754
Thanks stomper. I hope with time I may have this solved but I wont be working on it for a few days.

Congrats on your OC though, I posted this on other forums and people are calling insane/stupid for overclocking a laptop
post #158 of 754
Congrats Stomper! I have a couple questions. Will this mod work on other brand notebooks with sonoma or just the new dells? After you have a successful physical hardware OC is there a way to turn it down to what you regularly need with software? How did your voltage increase effect your batt life? Any heat issues? I think I understand the whole proccess, but you should make a step-by-step tutorial for this mod with pics. Thanks
post #159 of 754
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedFreek
Congrats Stomper! I have a couple questions. Will this mod work on other brand notebooks with sonoma or just the new dells? After you have a successful physical hardware OC is there a way to turn it down to what you regularly need with software? How did your voltage increase effect your batt life? Any heat issues? I think I understand the whole proccess, but you should make a step-by-step tutorial for this mod with pics. Thanks
It will work with any sonoma based system.

Speedstep will still work, however the 400FSB's have a default multi that is higher than the 533FSB chips

Heat is going to be an issue at any more Vcore than 1.45 or so. Its starting to exceed the limits of the cooling capacity of the 9300/XPS2.

Step by Step is coming soon, once I get my processor after the 1st of May.
post #160 of 754

PM760 Core Voltage - 1.308V

Quote:
Originally Posted by ziddey
i think that some 855 chipsets can do 533, but they sense the bclk pins instead of the bsel i believe. i'm not sure how exactly those pins work. the tech sheets dont document those much





also, could someone with a real pm 760 (2.0) chime in with what their default vcore is? because if it's the same as that of the pm 715 (1.5), there's no reason at all why an overclocked 715 would be any different at all from a 760. and if dell uses the same heatsink, then it should function in that respect identically as well.

and if the vcore on the 760 is higher than that of the 715, then more power to you! you have a cooler running 760 and itll have longer batt life than a true 760, and it should be stable still. intel puts a lot of buffer into these.
SiSoftware Sandra says my PM760 Core Voltage is 1.308V.

Take note in the processor's name it says;
P3D (Dothan) Pentium M 90nm 900-2.2GHz 0.9-1.4V

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home