NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Alienware Notebook Forums › Alienware Sentia, M11x and M14x › Alienware Sentia 1.8 vs. 1.6 benchmark battle
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Alienware Sentia 1.8 vs. 1.6 benchmark battle

post #1 of 12
Thread Starter 
I have promised a few people on this forum that I would do a little benchmark competition between my New Sentia (1.8pentium M) and my good friends Sentia (1.6 pentium M ) Both machines are the newest versions from Alienware and are both less than a four months old. For benchmarking software we both used the included Sisoftware Sandra benchmarking utilities included with our machines. Here is the specs for each mahine

Mine. 1.8ghz Pentium M, 1024 mg pc2700 ram (512x2) Hitiatchi 60gb 7200 rpm HDD. 8x DVD Burneer

Other 1.6ghz Pentium M 2m L2 Cache. 1024 mg pc2700 ram (512x2) Hitatchi 60gb 7200 rpm HDD. 6x dvd burner

Both machines were plugged into ac power and the bios was set for maximum performance. Both machines are running most current bios upgrades and both running current updated versions of XP Pro.

Heres the numbers

My machine.

CPU 1.8 Pentium M running at 1.98 ghz
Front side bus 4x110 mhz (440 data) FSB max rated 4x110 (overclocking?)
Memory Bus 2x110mhz (220) data

Dhrystone ALU 6464 mips
Whetstone FPU/iSSE2 2637/3264 FLOPS
Integer iSSE 11178 it/s Float iSSE 13065 its

Buddies Machine

CPU 1.6 Pentium M Running at 1.6ghz
FSB 4x100 (400 data) FSB max rated 4x100
Memory bus 2x110 mhz (220) data

Dhrystone 5207 mips
Whetstone FPU/iSSE2 2110/3203 flops
Integer iSSE 9078it/s Float iSSE 10540its

Also my practicle excercise of downloading an eight gb file from my cannon Digital video camera processing and then burning to DVD .
My sentia 42 minutes
Other 46 minutes

This test my not be realistic this time because the dvd burners are rated at different speeds. I threw it in just for the hell of it.

So I hope this answers some questions as to weather the extra $135.00 bucks for the 1.8 over the 1.6 cpu is worth it.
I know after reading reading the above statement it may seem like I know what I am doing. DONT LET IT FOOL YOU!!! I am by no means a know it all,Hell I dont even know what half the stuff I just read means
I just assume that higher scores are better.

Anyhow hope it helps,

Gunner
post #2 of 12
If would appear your buddies 1.6 either wasn't set to overclock or it didn't overclock for some reason. Maybe the 1.6 doesn't support it. But to compare green apples to red apples you should test the 1.8 without the overclocking.
post #3 of 12
You got me curious how the different BIOS settings would effect performance. I have a 2.0 Pentium M. I ran 3 sets of benchmarks, first run was a baseline with the CPU locked at 2.0Ghz

Dhrystone - 8,639
Whetstone - 2,737
MFLOPS - 3,566
Performance Rating - 2,400
Multi-Media Integer - 19,104
Multi-Media Float - 21,050

2nd test was under max battery settings. when I run on batteries I have the bios set to maximize battery life. Turns out what that means is my 2.0Ghz will run at 1.2Ghz max.

Dhrystone - 5,178 (60%)
Whetstone - 1,670 (61%)
MFLOPS - 2,136 (60%)
Performance Rating - 1,440 (60%)
Multi-Media Integer - 11,448 (60%)
Multi-Media Float - 12,615 (60%)

Last test was with the max performance enabled. So my 2.0Ghz cpu got overclocked to 2.2Ghz. Under those settings here are the scores and comparison to the base speed.

Dhrystone - 9,499 (110%)
Whetstone - 3,063 (112%)
MFLOPS - 3,917 (110%)
Performance Rating - 2,640 (110%)
Multi-Media Integer - 21,005 (110%)
Multi-Media Float - 23,147 (110%)
post #4 of 12
thanks!! I appreciate the work!!
post #5 of 12
Thread Starter 

1.6 overclocking

I just wanted to add that we tried every possible bios setting and performance sceme under windows power management and the 1.6 sentia would not overclock at any settings. I don't know why, Maybe the 1.6 isn't capable of overclocking?
If anyone really wants me to I can run my tests again with a different setting. Just let me know.

Gunner
post #6 of 12
Eh, I feel rather stupid, but is the current Sentia offered at the Alien Ware site a 1.8? Am I correct in assuming this?
post #7 of 12
Thread Starter 

sentia choices

The 1.6 Pentium M is the basic choice, Or should I saw the slowest of the available choices. I believe that they run from 1.6ghz to 2.1ghz. I chose the 1.8ghz version and am not dissapointed .

Gunner
post #8 of 12
Oops, I completely misread that. I know about ghz, but I was under the misconception that the 1.6 and 1.8 you were referring to was a version number on the laptop itself. My bad.
post #9 of 12
Thread Starter 

2.0 is a killer!!!

Robert,

Like I said I am by no means a computer expert, But the scores your sentia are putting out look great for a thin and light computer. They certainly look much higher than the scores my machine posted. Hell I can't imagine a machine that runs faster than my sentia does, Every application I have run from Lotus Word Pro to adobe photo shop seems to run almost instantly.
Even When running my Microtek Scanmaker i320 with the digital ice program to restore old damaged photos the process takes mere seconds instead 5+ minutes on my Desktop (AMD Athlon 2200+, Igig ddr333 ram).
I know that the 2.0 test scores are much higher than the 1.8 but I wonder if the real world performance will be dramatically higher?


Gunner
post #10 of 12
I doubt (my) real world performance is that much different. Like I mentioned when I am running on batteries mine acts like a 1.2Ghz pentium M and I don't really notice a difference.

Of course I am also not doing anything CPU intensive. I am a programmer so the vast majority of the time I have 3 background tasks (outlook, trillian, skype) and one forground task which is basically a text editor.

I bet I would notice a difference if I was using photoshop, video editing or something else that requires more thinking. But that is what I have a desktop machine for.

It would be interesting to see a 1.6 vs 1.8 battery life benchmark.
post #11 of 12
Thread Starter 

battery life benchmark

Battery life benchmark, Not a problem. Any suggestions as how to accomplish this? My partner (Not that kind of partner ) and I work together three days a week so we can find time to accomplish just about any test that anybody would want with the two sentias.



Gunner
post #12 of 12
Battery life:
I'd either a: Disable high performance/low battery life mode, and watch a vid or someting in windows. (Make sure it's the same vid and that your brightness settings are identical) or b: Disable HP/LB modes and give it a good workout. (ie, burning dvds, installing programs, processing large amounts of data, whatever it takes to keep it running at max the entire time) or c: just put it in BIOS and have it sit there, although this'd accomplish little, as the processors wouldn't be doing anything.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Alienware Sentia, M11x and M14x
NotebookForums.com › Forums › Notebook Manufacturers › Alienware Notebook Forums › Alienware Sentia, M11x and M14x › Alienware Sentia 1.8 vs. 1.6 benchmark battle