Originally Posted by lazybum131
You can post whatever you want, except that's not what you said. You are contradicting yourself, your posts were:
As I said in my first post, you CAN compare for specific uses. There are applications where the PM is strong and P4 is weak and vice versa, so when comparing and ranking which is better performing, it depends on what the user is going to be doing and how important is performance (or lack of) in particular uses and applications.
And it doesn't help that you come off as condescending especially since you don't seem to be very knowledgable about the subject.
Dude, lazybum knows exactly what I'm talking about, so does mimiman> I was just curious about how the Pentium M's compare to desktops in things like gaming and video encoding, etc. I'll be using my i9300 mostly for gaming and video editing/encoding. I just wanted to know how the processor stacks up against desktops for these situations.
Again, k25anova51, that's why I said clockspeed isn't such a determining factor on performance.
Having said all that...
How does the Pentium M 2.0GHz compare to an AMD 3500+ for video editing/encoding?
Same question for gaming performance?
And, how worthwhile is 2GB of RAM in both situations?