NotebookForums.com › Forums › General Notebook Discussions › Notebook Forums - General › 128 MB Nvidia 6600 vs 256 MB RADEON X700
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

128 MB Nvidia 6600 vs 256 MB RADEON X700

post #1 of 8
6/12/05 at 9:53pm
Thread Starter 
I am talking about the ones on the Asus Z71v and the Sager NP4880.



Which one is better and why? I cannot make up my mind on the two.
Reply
Reply
post #2 of 8
6/12/05 at 10:09pm
checkout the reviews and the benchmarks of the video cards
x700 is clocked higher and therefore faster
Reply
Reply
post #3 of 8
6/12/05 at 10:32pm
just caused its clocked higher doesn't mean it will be faster.

but what 1cent said, check out review.
Reply
Reply
post #4 of 8
6/12/05 at 10:46pm
it is faster stock, but has less OCing potential i think.
Reply
Reply
post #5 of 8
6/12/05 at 11:00pm
The 6600 go in the 3880 is clocked little higher than the one in the asus. But still the x700 is faster. You can see some benchmarks in Sager reviews/benchmarks, comparing 3880 to 4880.
Reply
Reply
post #6 of 8
6/13/05 at 2:30am
The X700 is faster. The additional 128MB just makes it even better.
Reply
Reply
post #7 of 8
6/13/05 at 2:38am
X700 is faster, the x700 has great OC potential. I got my Oced x700 to around 6960 (or thereabouts) while another poster broke 7000 in 3dmark03. I only have the 128mb version.
Reply
Reply
post #8 of 8
6/13/05 at 1:55pm
X700 is still faster than nVIdia 6600. I would say the nVidia 6600 is between ATI x600 and x700. There is a gap between there where nVidia 6600 could sit nicely.
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Notebook Forums - General
NotebookForums.com › Forums › General Notebook Discussions › Notebook Forums - General › 128 MB Nvidia 6600 vs 256 MB RADEON X700